Care home staff refusing to submit to experimental vaccine

Unpredictable nature of effects causing many to refuse vax until its safety is certain

by Anthony Taft

The authorities seeking to force the new improperly trialed and tested vaccines on to care home staff fear a virtual revolt. This comes as fears grow that half of their care home staff could refuse to take the vaccine despite  the considerable pressure staff are under to submit to it.

The reluctance of people to allow themselves to be injected with the new experimental vaccine is understandable as in the rush to push through a vaccine for a flu-like illness when trials and tests have been skimped so that no-one knows what the short, medium or long terms effects on health may be.

Healthcare bosses, evidently deaf to these understandable concerns are calling on ministers to make the jabs compulsory.

The irresponsibility of injecting large numbers of people with an experimental substance whose effects are as yet not fully known is obvious. The double irresponsibility of bosses seeking to force their workers to submit to them and in effect become unpaid guinea pigs is  even more so.

Bosses are of course in a vulnerable position because if the untested vax turns out to cause long term health problems or even death, they are open to being sued by their employees or the surviving relatives thereof for forcing them to take a vaccine that was not proven safe.

The pressure to take the vaccine makes even less sense in light of recent revelations that the vaccines do not proof one against contracting the virus OR spreading it but merely suppress symptoms to some degree.

One source who wished to remain anonymous said,”There hardly seems much point in forcing staff to take an experimental vaccine with unknown risks when it does not even protect them from the virus or prevent them spreading it if they catch  it. None of this makes any sense and it is starting to look as if the vaccine may be more of a threat than the virus.”

There therefore appears to be a great deal of confusion and outright fear over this vaccine due to the dishonest misrepresentation by the government of what it can and can’t do.

For instance, its much-touted  “high success rate” refers to its ability to suppress some of the COVID19 symptoms a bit rather than actually do what the majority assume a vaccine will do: render one immune.

Meanwhile the government continues to produce misleading stats for the numbers of “infections” based on the discredited PCR test, which it admits on one of its websites cannot detect the presence of an infectious virus and is prone to produce thousands of false positives.

Why the government continues to publish false stats derived from a test shown to be utterly unsuited to the task given it and then base lockdowns and the push to inject people with a rushed vaccine that does not grant immunity in any case remains unclear at this time.

No satisfactory explanation from the government has been forthcoming and this has prompted a growing number of people to question both its honesty and its sanity.

All this comes amid reports that many GP surgeries have decided against taking part in the roll-out , citing  “concerns their workloads are already too heavy.”

It is known, however, that very many people in the medical profession have grave concerns over the vaccine and its safety and effectiveness, with some doctors bluntly advising people not to take it.As one observer said,”The fact of the matter is that we do not know what this vaccine will do so we are in a position of taking a gamble every time we vaccinate someone. It might do nothing, it might kill. Certainly the manufacturers have concerns because they have gotten their friends in government to indemnify them against prosecution should their vaccines harm anyone. Quite frankly the risks are not worth taking considering the vaccine can’t even stop you getting or spreading the virus!”

The above article is from the People’s Media website WWN

Visit WWN for more great articles


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 2280 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.