BREXIT: TEN YEARS OF TREASON
Ten years after we voted to leave the EU our political traitors have still not delivered what Britain asked for and what the country needed. How can we fix this?
BRITISH PATRIOT’S SUBSTACK
On the 23rd June 2016, in the biggest ever democratic expression of the wishes of the British people, we voted to leave the EU. And ever since our political traitors have sought to block and sabotage this at every turn. Yes, we are ruled by Britain-hating scum, and you just don’t hate them enough.
I am not going to waste your time with a detailed history of the last ten years – you all remember what happened perfectly well. How governments, MPs, the Speaker and the judges all conspired to undermine any attempt to allow Britain to break free form the EU shackles that held us prisoners. From the Benn ‘Treason’ Act, to the cowardice and surrender of Tory prime ministers Theresa ‘the Traitor’ May, Boris ‘the Buffoon’ Johnson and Rishi ‘the Retard’ Sunak. We have been stabbed in the back again and again. Brexit and Britain have been betrayed every step of the way.
Britain never really left the EU. Yes, technically we are no longer members, but just look at the reality. Northern Ireland is still ruled by the EU, which means that our country has been divided in two, and we now have to pass through a foreign-controlled border in order to travel in our own country and trade with our fellow countrymen. No other country on earth has suffered this sort of disaster or indignity outside of a wartime defeat. But May, Johnson and Sunak surrendered without any resistance whatsoever. We are told that this was necessary because of the Belfast Agreement (known by the IRA and its supporters as the ‘Good Friday Agreement’), but this is a complete lie, as I explained at the time and in great detail in this brilliant analysis here: https://britishpatriot.substack.com/p/the-great-northern-ireland-protocol
May, Johnson and Sunak betrayed Britain at every turn, from the surrender of our fishing waters to the Boriswave of third-world invaders. And while we’re on the subject of Tory Traitors, I am really sick and tired of the easy ride that the media are giving to Kemi Badenoch. We are constantly being told how ‘right wing’ she is, how she is pro-Brexit and anti-mass immigration. This continual campaign to boost ‘brand Badenoch’ (in the hope that it will eventually rub off on the Conservative Party itself and raise their poll rating) has been allowed to go unopposed by Reform and Nigel Farage, who seem to be too stupid to understand the importance of exposing the dark truth.
In reality Badenoch is pro-mass immigration and anti-Brexit. And this can easily be proved by just looking at the facts. On 19th December 2018, for instance, in response to moves by Sajid Javid (then the Home Secretary) which included allowing in more supposedly ‘skilled’ migrants, Badenoch, then a backbencher, stood up in the House of Commons and said: “As a first-generation immigrant, can I welcome the home secretary’s statement? I feel this immigration white paper is a move from the 20th century to a much better future immigration system. In particular I’d like to thank the home secretary for removing annual limits on work visas and also on international students, both of which I lobbied for”. So there you have it. In her own words, and on the record, she considers herself an immigrant and “lobbied for” fewer restrictions and controls on mass immigration.
And on the subject of the EU, her treason is even greater. One of the prime justifications for Brexit was to free ourselves from EU rules and regulations. To ‘Take Back Control’. It was widely recognised that EU rules were too restrictive and were holding our businesses back and not allowing us to compete with the booming economies of less constrained countries ranging from the US to Singapore. So in September 2022 Jacob Rees-Mogg, a genuine Brexiteer and the then Business Secretary, introduced The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill, which included a ‘Sunset Clause’ which meant that all EU regulations would automatically expire on 31st December 2023 (unless ministers specifically chose to keep them). To give you an idea of the scale of the burden of EU regulations it was calculated that there were over 5,000 such rules controlling every aspect of our economy.
But when Kemi Badenoch took over as Business Secretary in February 2023 one of the first things she did was perform a complete U-turn, gutting the Bill and scrapping the Sunset Clause. While she maintains that she did remove hundreds of EU regulations, this was in reality just a tidying-up exercise, with most of these either trivial or already obsolete. The reality is that she allowed more than 4,000 EU laws, rules and regulations to remain on the books, keeping us handcuffed and trapped by the EU. And it is precisely because we remain so closely aligned to the EU’s rules that it is so easy for Keir Starmer to now slowly drag us back into the EU’s control.
This is why we must not allow Kemi Badenoch to portray herself as some kind of right-wing warrior, a patriot who can be relied upon to stand up for Britain. Her words are cheap lies: the facts prove that the opposite is true. And as for the pretence that she is opposed to the anti-white racism that is now so dominant, that is a sick joke. She was the Equalities Minister for four years and what did she do to help whites, or men, or the native British people? Nothing. We need to get the message out there: she is KEMI THE FRAUD. She is the enemy of Britain and of the British people. And if Reform and Farage are too stupid to do so then we must do this ourselves at every opportunity.
But back on topic. Brexit. Almost daily the media bombards us with absurd anti-Brexit stories, telling us that this has been responsible for cataclysmic economic decline and that it is inevitable that we will eventually have to return, like pitiful lost sheep, back into the EU fold. This is, of course, nonsense, but the left-wing media is relentless in trying to brainwash us into accepting this narrative. And no newspaper is more guilty in this respect than the Financial Times. Yes, you may be surprised by this, but the FT is even worse than the Guardian (which comes in a close second, mind you). And if you want a good laugh, just look at the online FT and the below-the-line comments of their subscribers, who are obsessed by Brexit and mention its supposed horrors every single day, under every single article, even if the story has nothing to do with Brexit at all! They are clinically insane and are suffering from obsessional derangement. Yes, Brexit has quite literally driven them mad. Frankie Howerd used to say “Ooh no, don’t mock the afflicted”, but you cannot help but titter at these FT retards.
We are told by various organisations that, because of Brexit, Britain’s GDP has fallen by 2%, or 4%, or 6%, or 8%, or any other number plucked out of the air at random and then doubled. There is, of course, absolutely no proof of this. No proof at all. How could there be? It is literally impossible to prove what would have occurred in some imaginary alternative universe. But this doesn’t stop the EU-worshipping fanatics from devising ever more fanciful and convoluted economic models to try and come up with the negative numbers they have decided they must obtain. And anything that points the other way is simply ignored. So when a manufacturer tells the FT that while, yes, he regrets the extra bureaucracy involved in exporting to the EU “the biggest immediate burden is not cross-border red tape but the UK’s prodigious energy costs”, this is ignored.
But maybe the FT will listen to the professional economist who tells them: “The UK’s strategy now should be to get energy costs down, to accelerate planning decisions, and to get more capital flowing. That’s how to create a UK services superpower as well as helping other sectors like manufacturing. The agenda must go well beyond rethinking relations with the EU.” Err, no, he is ignored too. For the FT (and the rest of the liberal media and establishment) is just as wedded to the mentally retarded Net Zero agenda as they are to the EU. The fact that there is no proof that man is affecting the climate, or that the UK could do anything that would make a material difference to world temperatures, does not in any way diminish their quasi-religious fanatical belief that we must immolate our economy and our lifestyles on the altar of their Net Zero God.
So, am I saying that Brexit was a success? No, but neither was it a failure. The problem is our stupid media and our stupid politicians, who don’t understand that this question – ‘was Brexit a success?’ – is itself very, very stupid. It’s a question that only a childish cretin would ask. Brexit was a tool. Like a hammer is a tool. If you hit your thumb with a hammer when you are trying to put a nail in the wall, was the hammer a failure? No, of course not. You were the failure because you failed to use the hammer properly. Brexit was a tool. It gave us freedom and independence. How we use that freedom and independence is up to us. Or rather, up to our politicians. So the proper question is: “Did our politicians make a success of Brexit?”. And the answer is NO. Because the fact is that, so far, they have used Brexit very badly indeed.
Why is this?
Well, let’s go back to that arch-enemy of Brexit, the FT. In a recent article bemoaning that fatal decision, in between the wailing, the gnashing of teeth and the rending of cloth, we read this very revealing quote: “It is very difficult to find anyone, however they voted, who says they are delighted with how Brexit turned out,” said Lord George Bridges, who served as a Brexit minister under Conservative premier Theresa May after the 2016 referendum. “But no one in a position of power in government since Brexit has answered the basic question of what kind of country do we want to be – flowing from that, what economy do we want to build?”
This is really the key problem, and considering that this man was a minister at the Department for Exiting the European Union, responsible for our Brexit policy, this is the ultimate confession of guilt. If we still had the death penalty for treason (as we should have!) even the famous gallows at Tyburn – with its ‘Triple Tree’ capable of hanging 24 people at a time – would be insufficient to execute all our guilty politicians.
In July 2017, Philip Hammond, the Remain-voting chancellor appointed by the Remain-voting Prime Minister Theresa May to oversee Brexit, said explicitly: “I often hear it said that the UK is considering participating in unfair competition [with the EU] in regulation and tax. That is neither our plan nor our vision for the future. I would expect us to remain a country with a social, economic and cultural model that is recognisably European.” So it was the intention all along to make no significant changes to our economy. So how was this meant to improve? How was this meant to take into account our new circumstances? It wasn’t. All the treasonous Tories wanted to do was continue as before. And therefore continue to fail, as before.
And more than that: in what world is changing our tax structure or our regulations in order to compete with the EU “unfair”??? This quote proves that the UK government never had the UK’s best interests at heart, only the interests of the EU. May and Hammond did not want to do anything that might harm the EU. This was also, by the way, the reason for the Northern Ireland Protocol, because May made it clear that Brexit should not cause any problems for Ireland. May and Hammond are TRAITORS to Britain who deserve the death penalty.
Not that Boris Johnson or Lord Frost are any better: the December 2020 Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) which they signed up to committed the UK to remain aligned with the EU on regulations relating to state aid, competition, the environment and employment. In what world is this ‘Brexit’, or Taking Back Control, or independence, or freedom??? It isn’t. It’s just capitulation and subservience to the EU. This is why Farage MUST repudiate the TCA. Will he do so? Maybe I missed it, but I’ve never heard him explicitly say so. This worries me a great deal.
We never had a government that saw Brexit as a chance to build a New Britain. All our governments ever sought to do was to minimise what they saw as the ‘problems’ and ‘harms’ of Brexit. May, Johnson, Sunak, and now Starmer: all their Brexit policies were, and are, ‘damage-limitation’ exercises, rather than opportunities to create a completely DIFFERENT – and better – country.
So instead of developing a completely new economic model, with completely new economic policies, rules and procedures, we mainly just carried on as before – even retaining most of the old, failed, EU regulations (thanks Badenoch, you useless traitor!). But the old economic model had been devised for our membership of the EU (indeed, much of it had been imposed on us by the EU itself), and makes no sense when we are an independent country. So of course it is easy for the media to highlight all the failings that being outside the EU have led to, when our economy is tailored for membership of the bloc.
Opponents of Brexit will whine that it is impossible for Britain to be economically successful outside the EU, but this is idiotic and defeatist nonsense. These people are the real ‘little Englanders’: they believe our country is too little and too weak to succeed on its own. These people despise Britain so much they refuse to accept the true potential of this great country, that gave the world the industrial revolution, more scientific and technological innovation than any other nation on earth and the greatest Empire the world has ever known!
Of course we could thrive, and rise to new heights, outside the EU – with the right policies.
So, what would those be? The thing you need to understand is that while our financial and services sector is thriving, our industrial sector is in grave decline, and our whole economy is suffering as a result. Britain was at its most successful back in the 19th century when we were known as ‘the workshop of the world‘. When you make things you make money. If you have a trade deficit you have an economic deficit.
And that was one of the main economic problems we faced in the EU. Far from benefitting our economy it actually was destroying it. Because we were actually prohibited from boosting our manufacturing industry, while other countries were allowed to steal investment from us. Shocking, but true. And to prove my case let me give you a perfect example of the problem, and the incident that crystallised for me the economic need to vote Leave. In 2015 Jaguar Land Rover decided they needed to build a huge new mega-factory. It would cost over a billion pounds and employ almost 3,000 people directly, and many more indirectly. It would lead to huge export revenues and was exactly what Britain needed to boost not just our car manufacturing industry but our whole economy.
But other countries also saw the potential benefits and tried to lure JLR to build its factory in their country. In the end, Slovakia offered JLR around £110 million in state aid to encourage them to build the factory there. And what did the EU do? They said that was fine – but the UK was banned from matching this funding! So of course JLR went where the aid was and built their factory there. And Britain lost out. And all because of the EU’s anti-British discrimination.
This story not only illustrates the reason why we had to leave the EU, but also tells us what we needed to do once we were free. Because outside the EU we could start to offer companies those state aids that we were banned from offering them as EU members, thus enticing them to build their factories in Britain. And outside the EU we had plenty of money with which to do so: well over a billion pounds every month – because this was what we were previously forced to hand over to our EU overlords: approximately £13-16 billion a year (it varied according to annual GDP rates). What beautiful poetic justice: the money the EU previously stole from us could now be used to revive the economy the EU previously sought to destroy!
Now remember that JLR invested over a billion pounds in Slovakia after receiving around 10% of this in state aid. So imagine how much investment we could attract if we invested a billion pounds every month in luring new manufacturing, from motorcars to microchips, from steel to satellites, from batteries to battle ships, from aviation and robotics to pharmaceuticals and chemicals and nuclear power stations and everything in between. By offering massive state aids, combined with a bonfire of regulations, and a cheap energy policy (which means scrapping the net zero madness!), we would have created the most dynamic and fastest growing economy in the world.
That is the policy we could, and should, have adopted.
Of course this would have been incompatible with a free trade agreement with the EU, but who cares? Most Brexit supporters wanted a ‘No-deal Brexit’, meaning we would have had no obligation to follow any EU rules or offer them anything. This would have meant no EU fishing boats in UK waters, and no border between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Trade would have taken place under World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules, and while this would have meant some tariffs these would have benefitted the UK.
The point is that given that we import so much more than we export to the EU, free trade in goods benefits them, not us. We would be much better off going for an import substitution economic model, where we make things here, in Britain, rather than importing them and giving our money and jobs to foreign countries. And with a booming economy we would be able to significantly cut corporation tax, which would more than make up for the tariffs that our exporters would have faced. The point is that our whole mindset is completely wrong as far as the EU is concerned. Our cowardly and treacherous politicians are still obsessed with the idea that we must cooperate with the EU, but the only way you can ever win – be it in sport or business or even in war – is to compete. Instead of wanting to work with the EU we should be trying to beat them.
And the other thing we should have done since Brexit was to combine this economic model I am proposing with a low immigration policy, where we only allow in people from first-world countries with genuinely important and valuable skills, such as scientists, surgeons, engineers and entrepreneurs – people who will benefit our economy and society not be parasites draining us for all they can get. Of course this would mean leaving the ECHR, and scrapping all asylum and all benefits to foreigners. And this would have led to even more financial savings. Foreign parasites currently cost this country approximately a billion pounds every month in benefit payments alone! Imagine how much better off we would all be if we could spend that money on British citizens rather than filthy foreign invaders.
Britain-hating traitors will reject these policies out of hand, without trying to actually analyse them scientifically, but the fact is that the performance of our financial services sector proves that my economic prescription is accurate. You see, while we have a trade agreement (the TCA) with the EU, that forces us to submit to many of their rules for our goods manufacturing sector, we have no similar agreement covering services. And guess what – while our manufacturing sector is in decline our financial sector is absolutely booming!
Before the referendum, the anti-Brexit scaremongering whores told us that leaving the EU would destroy the City of London, but the reality is that the opposite has happened. Since Brexit took effect in 2020 our export of financial and insurance services has increased by over 26%. Both the FT and the Guardian reluctantly accept that, as the latter admits, “the City has continued to boom” and “about 1.1 million people are still employed across the City today, where bosses have toasted regulators for tearing up the EU rulebook, scrapping banker bonus caps and loosening listing rules that could help revive the UK stock market”.
And in those new technology areas such as AI and fintech where the UK is ploughing an independent path to the EU, unrestrained by any agreement, we are smashing them by any metric you choose.
For instance, the latest 2025 figures show that total UK fintech investment was £8 billion, more than France, Germany, Belgium, all the Nordics and Ireland combined. Remain cretins mocked Leavers by saying we were proposing fictional unicorns, but in financial terms unicorns do really exist: they are defined as privately-owned start-ups worth over $1 billion. And someone needs to point out to those EU-worshipping cretins that the UK has produced nearly 50 real-life fintech unicorns since Brexit (no EU country has more than 15), with a combined value of over £185 billion, and with four out of Europe’s five largest fintech unicorns based in the UK.
As for Artificial Intelligence, the UK captured 41% of all European venture capital, raising £7.2 billion in Q1 2026 alone, and AI startups accounted for a staggering £5.2 billion (over 70%) of that total. The UK boasts over 1,800 active AI startups, which is more than France and Germany combined. London concentrates more AI talent, compute access, and tech investment than any EU city.
So as you can see, when it comes to our services sector, which is outside the UK-EU TCA, as Frank Sinatra would say, ‘the record shows, we took the blows, and did it our way‘ – and won. This is exactly what we should have done in the goods and manufacturing sector too.
So while it is obvious and beyond dispute that Britain has been betrayed by both the Tory and Labour scum, the question that needs answering is what is Reform’s vision of Brexit Britain? I haven’t heard any clear exposition of what policies they will adopt to use Brexit in a way that will make Britain rich and successful once again.
Will Reform completely tear up the Northern Ireland Protocol and the Windsor Framework?
Will Reform reverse the restrictions on state aids to industry imposed by the TCA?
Will Reform abolish all EU rules and regulations still in force?
Will Reform adopt a policy of import substitution?
Will Reform only award government contracts to UK manufacturers and suppliers?
Will Reform match any and all tariffs and restrictions imposed by the EU on UK exports?
Will Reform kick out all EU fishing boats from UK waters?
We need to know.
Does Reform itself know what it intends to do? As Labour (whether under Starmer or Burnham) moves Britain closer to the EU, accepts more EU rules, and agrees to more EU payments, Reform will need to have a clear long-term policy in order to respond intelligently and consistently. Ideally Reform would appoint a Shadow EU Minister who would be the go-to spokesman who would brief the media on Reform’s agenda. But as Nigel still hasn’t appointed a Defence Spokesman (despite how important this is currently), I suspect there is little hope that he will appoint an EU Spokesman.
Reform needs to up its game. It needs to promote a policy designed boost British manufacturing. The country desperately needs a government that will finally take advantage of the freedom and independence which Brexit has given us to pursue a Britain-first agenda. We’ve only been waiting ten years …
———–
If you liked this article then please share it on Facebook, Twitter/X, and by email to all your friends.
Spread the word!!
And SUBSCRIBE (it’s completely free!)!
Thank you 🙂
This article (BREXIT: TEN YEARS OF TREASON) was created and published by British Patriots Substack and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply