by Kieron McFadden
The BBC just did a hatchet job on The Light newspaper that is one of the most vicious and downright mendacious pieces of “journalism” I’ve ever seen.
Why the BBC thinks it is perfectly okay to disinform its audience in this way is something of a mystery. For sure though it is symptomatic of the BBC’s low opinion of its audience: it thinks so little of them it conceives dis-serving them lie after lie after lie to be perfectly acceptable.
And it demonstrates, too, a low opinion of its audience’s gullibility in that it never occurred to the authors of the hatchet job that those lied to might have the sense to take a look at The Light to see if what it is being accused of is true. Does it, for instance “share violence and hate” as the BBC accuses?
Well that’s very easy to verify simply by reading an issue of The Light to see what the newspaper ACTUALLY SAYS – and you don’t even have to buy a copy: you can read it for free on line.
Here the BBC has shot itself in the foot. Simply reading The Light shows immediately that it is not doing what the BBC is accusing it of. For instance, is there any sharing of “violence and hate” in it? Having a read of The Light, I sure as hell couldn’t find any. And the BBC accusing others of “sharing violence and hate” seems to me to be a severe case of the pot calling the kettle black.
If you are going to lie, choose lies that cannot be easily disproven in about thirty seconds because if you don’t you are going to obliterate your own credibility and trustworthiness in the eyes of your audience – and floodlight the fact that you are making things up and not doing a shred of honest research.
Well, check out The Light and decide for yourself. Is the BBC lying or isn’t it? And if it is, is there any way it could be doing so “by accident?” You decide.
Of course, millions who are already familiar with The Light were able to spot the litany of fabrications from the outset and be justifiably outraged at the cynicism and viciousness of the BBC’s behaviour.
This all makes defending The Light easy: you don’t even have to argue, just chuckle, calmly tell people to read the light and draw their own conclusions and let nature take its course.
And herein lies another aspect of this sorry spectacle: how desperate do you have to be to crush a perceived enemy that you have to place your own credibility and reputation in danger by resorting to such rash shenanigans?
Well, very desperate by the looks of it. The only reason The Light attracted an attack of this nature is that it has been doing too well. If it were failing, nobody would bother to attack it.
The Light has grown at a phenomenal pace, in the short while since its launch attracting an audience faster than the subverted MSM is losing theirs and the powers that pull the BBC’s puppet strings don’t like the way things are going.
An effort, however, to turn round one’s declining fortunes by lying one’s way out of trouble carries with it the seeds of terminal demise.
But form your own conclusions.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.