
The climate scaremongers: The £100billion renewables scam (and counting)
Renewable Subsidies Set To Top £100 Billion This Year

PAUL HOMEWOOD
If you asked the public how much subsidies for renewable energy have cost over the years, they might guess a few billion, maybe even ten billion or so. But I very much doubt anybody would say £100 billion. Yet that is exactly what the cumulative cost of these subsidies will have amounted to by the end of this year.
Since 2010, when costs began to mount up, the bill has already risen to over £90 billion for the three major schemes, Renewable Obligation (RO), Contracts for Difference (CfD) and Feed in Tariffs (FIT). And that figure does not even include indirect subsidies, such as providing standby capacity, grid balancing and constraint payments.
Last year CfD subsidies were at a record high of £2732 million, and RO costs also set a record of £6883 million. Both are projected to go even higher this year. Add in another couple of billion for FIT, and the bill stands at close to £12 billion for the year, all of which gets added onto our electricity bills.

https://dp.lowcarboncontracts.uk/dataset/actual-cfd-generation-and-avoided-ghg-emissions

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/energy-trends-section-6-renewables

It is little wonder that we have the highest electricity prices in the developed world.
But where was the Parliamentary authority for these subsidies, which have all been imposed by government diktat? On what legal basis have successive governments imposed what is in effect a tax on its citizens?
Take Renewable Obligations, for example, which have already cost bill payers over £70 billion. These were originally introduced by the DTI in 2002 via a Statutory Instrument, about which the Parliament website says:
“Statutory instruments are the most common form of secondary (or delegated) legislation.
The power to make a statutory instrument is set out in an Act of Parliament and nearly always conferred on a Minister of the Crown. The Minister is then able to make law on the matters identified in the Act, and using the parliamentary procedure set out in the Act.”
In other words, a Minister can use an SI to make law, without the need for an Act of Parliament. The original legal authority was embedded in the innocuous sounding Utilities Act 2000, a wide ranging bill designed to regulate the gas and electricity industries. It was never the intention of that Act to empower Ministers to levy tens of billions from bill payers in order to pursue their perverted political agenda.
And in 2010 the scheme was extended from 2027 to 2037, by which time the bill will probably have doubled, again using an SI.
There was certainly never a democratic mandate for any of this. At no stage were the public consulted, never mind given the opportunity to vote on renewable energy policy, Ed Miliband’s 2008 Climate Change Act or Theresa May’s suicidal Net Zero law.
But we are all paying the bill.
More Bad News For UK Motor Industry
Stellantis have confirmed that their Vauxhall van plant in Luton will close in April, despite pleas from Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds’ pleas for a rethink.
Stellantis, which also owns Citroen, Peugeot and Fiat, previously said rules imposed to speed up the transition to electric vehicles (EVs) in the UK were the main reason for their decision. Under the government’s Zero Emission Vehicle mandate, 16% of the vans Vauxhall sell this year must be electric. If they sell less, they face a fine of £18000 for every non-compliant diesel/petrol van.
Because buyers show little interest in electric vans, Vauxhall are being forced to cut back production of non-electric ones in order to avoid the fines.
But now even worse news has hit the UK motor industry, with BMW announcing that they are pulling the plug on a £600 million investment upgrade of its plant in Cowley.
The upgrade was to enable production of a new generation of electric Minis there. BMW say that the investment has been “paused”, but it looks unlikely that it will ever go ahead. Demand for electric cars in general, and Minis in particular, remains weak, and clearly does not justify BMW’s grandiose investment plans.
It was a different matter entirely two years ago, when they announced their investment, with the BBC reporting:
“German car giant BMW has announced plans to invest hundreds of millions of pounds to prepare its Mini factory near Oxford to build a new generation of electric cars.
Production of two new electric Mini models is due to begin at the plant in Cowley in 2026.
The move is expected to safeguard the future of the facility, as well as that of another factory in Swindon.
More than 4,000 people currently work across the two sites.
BMW already make electric Minis in China, mostly aimed at the Asian market, and have plans to make the electric Countryman in Germany. It is therefore highly likely that the Chinese factory will end up supplying most of the electric Minis bought in the UK.
This, of course, puts the long term future of the iconic Cowley plant is doubt. Although many Minis are exported, particularly to the US, it is hard to see how Cowley can be viable without a UK market for its petrol and diesel models, which will of course disappear in five years time, thanks to Ed Miliband’s 2030 ban on new sales of them.
The Government is currently consulting with the industry about how the ZEV mandate is implemented, but it is absolutely clear any changes made will be purely window dressing. Meanwhile the Unite union is warning about thousands of job losses if the Government continues down its path. And a new study says vehicle manufacturers are predicted to miss ZEV new car sales targets by over 345,000 units by 2028, which would equate to fines totalling £5.1 billion.
With China already exporting cheap Evs to Europe, the UK motor industry sits between a rock and a hard place, thanks to the suicidal Net Zero agenda.
This article (The climate scaremongers: The £100billion renewables scam (and counting)) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Paul Homewood
See Related Articles Below
Net Zero is Dying Around the World But the Diehards Live on Helped by Vast Amounts of Chinese Coal

CHRIS MORRISON
In 2021, President Xi Jinping promised that China would “strictly limit the increase in coal consumption over the 14th five-year plan period (2021-2025) and phase down in the 15th five-year plan period (2026-2030)”. Perhaps something got lost in the translation of “strictly limit” or should we just limit ourselves to the appropriate response – hahahahaha. Net Zero is dying around the world, no more so than in China where the appropriate lip service goes hand in hand with the full service manufacturing and sale of dud windmills and solar panels to subsidy-seekers reliant on dwindling bands of deluded politicians.

The graphs above from a recent report by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air and the Global Energy Monitor shows clearly the sterling attempts China has made to strictly limit coal production. Excellent progress has been achieved in retiring old capacity and replacing it 10-fold with new plant. As this new plant comes on stream, further mirth might arise as China enters its “phase down” period of coal consumption. It need hardly be added that all this coal production introduces a particularly dirty hydrocarbon into the manufacturing process, while cleaner natural gas with, incidentally, half the carbon dioxide emissions remains unfracked across large areas of Europe.
All this hypocrisy is necessary of course as deindustrialising Greens indulge their luxury beliefs and pretend to save the planet by outsourcing to China all the goods that they have lost the will to make for themselves. Neo-Marxism takes over in declining countries as insulated elites are happy to live off the revenues of a bloated state. If the trend continues, increasingly, as in the old Soviet Union, ‘ordinary’ citizens will pretend to work and the state will pretend to pay them. Already in the UK public sector, large numbers of people are ‘working from home’ despite Covid restrictions being lifted years ago. An even more dystopian future might be envisaged as the lessons of history teach that strong tribes invariably take over weak, decadent groupings.
But not every country is indulging its juvenile Greens. In the United States, Net Zero is stone dead. The election of Donald Trump is sweeping away any official concern about the invented climate crisis – the majority is swiftly coming around to the view that the science backing up the scare is mostly produced by garbage in, garbage out computer models, the ‘tipping points’ never tip, the temperature data are often a creative invention of state-employed meteorologists and the claim of ‘settled’ science is a political reaction to the scientific process that would have drawn admiration from a medieval Pope. Trust in mainstream media is falling off a cliff – people are genuinely pissed when they discover that there have been three years of record growth on the Great Barrier Reef at a time when mainstream media kept telling them that if they continued eating meat the coral will all be gone within a decade. When folk want to worry about the Gulf Stream (solid as a rock, unpublicised scientists say) they can watch the science fiction film The Day After Tomorrow rather than read the ubiquitous model predictions of imminent collapse. Recent fires in Los Angeles might be less scary to a general audience if mainstream media didn’t omit the fact that wildfires in North America are running at less than a quarter of the recent historical rate.
In the US, NASA has been told to butt out of climate speculation and go back to launching rockets – a nice change since it has been unable to send astronauts to the Space Station for over a decade. All departments such as defence must concentrate on the tasks specified in their title. The Federal Reserve will have to go back to banking and stop wasting everyone’s time by enforcing climate change regulations on the productive service economy. Days before Trump took over, the Fed withdrew from a busy-body global cartel of central banks and regulators that it is reported were exploring ways to “police climate risk in the financial system”.
Most climate funding appears to have been cut. Distributions of foreign aid are out and it is estimated that at least 10% of funding for all the UN promises has been lost. It is reported that the contribution of US federal scientists to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has been halted. NASA’s Chief Scientist Kate Calvin was due to co-chair an upcoming IPCC meeting in China designed to set in motion another climate ‘assessment’ round. Her absence bodes ill for both the meeting and the ability of the IPCC to continues with its ‘Code Red’ doomsday claptrap. Perhaps most significant of all is the recent news that the head of the Environmental Protection Agency has asked the administration to rescind a 2009 ‘endangerment finding’ on the so-called greenhouse gases. “This is the holy grail of the climate agenda,” observes Marc Morano of Climate Depot. “If you want to permanently cripple the United States climate agenda you have to go at the heart of it. This is the heart of it,” he added. He is correct. Terming carbon dioxide as a harmful pollutant opened a pandora’s box that has enabled Government activists to ban and regulate consumer goods to their own heart’s content. Already paper straws, wholly unsuitable for tackling the testing demands of a McDonald’s milkshake, have gone.
No such luck in the UK where the activists on the Climate Change Committee have informed the citizenry that within 15 years they will need to eat less meat and dairy, install noisy, expensive and inefficient heat pumps, pay much higher air fares and remove 80% of their popular internal combustion cars from the road. The Guardian is the mouthpiece for these lunatics and Fiona Harvey spins it as giving up two doner kababs a week. How convenient for Fiona and her comfortable chums in the North London wing of the governing elite. The Labour party gave up on the appalling working class years ago. Saving Planet Earth means clearing the roads of their frightful old bangers, removing most of them from sunny beaches in the Med and getting rid of all that ghastly food that the Holy Who Walk Amongst Us have to smell late at night on their way back from an uplifting play at the National Theatre.
Up the Miners – as the old working class Labour party used to say. Still going strong in China, needless to say.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
This article (Net Zero is Dying Around the World But the Diehards Live on Helped by Vast Amounts of Chinese Coal) was created and published by Daily Sceptic and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Chris Morrison
*****
Robert Bryce Exposes the Roots of Britain’s Self-Imposed Energy Crisis As Green Religionists Run Wild
This relatively short (less than 27 minutes long) interview of Robert Bryce is just excellent. I highly recommend it.
He details exactly why the “energy transition” is failing and why Britain is “facing oblivion.”
Enjoy the interview!
WATCH:
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply