POLICE ARREST PARENTS FOR COMPLAINING ABOUT A SCHOOL
PAUL SUTTON
This article makes incredible reading. Six officers sent to make the arrests, then parents held in the cells for eight hours. This in a force which cannot deal with routine shoplifting, so forget burglaries.
I don’t want to sound pessimistic but these five points have to be made:
1. The very fact this occurred shows we’ve lost free speech. As ever, there was – eventually – no charge. But that’s not the point. It happened without any great media outrage, because such harassment is normalised and not news-worthy. Yet it’s no exaggeration to say the story matters more than George Floyd, Boris Johnson eating cake, and virtually anything else that dominates the news for days. British people need to know they can be arrested for criticising those in authority who don’t like being criticised.
2. Oft-repeated: ‘the process is the punishment’. Simply going through this nightmare for those parents would have been unthinkable to – say – my parents. It shames us as a nation how this happens routinely in Britain.
3. Less oft-repeated: the fear of undergoing the process is the intention, ensuring self-censorship. How many people now feel that criticising their child’s school is dangerous? That’s called silent tyranny.
4. The Free Speech Union et al have done a good job. But the vast majority of this is ongoing, every day, in every workplace. The fact we don’t hear about it means nothing – it’s now routine.
5. Until – and unless – people get angry about this, it will get worse, much worse.
I’ve seen many asking: ‘but what did these parents say?’. I understand: people simply can’t believe the arrests were for saying something the school didn’t like. But the parents weren’t investigated for incitement or threats. So that is the case. No doubt the school and Governors at the school were upset. In no sane country does that make it a police matter.
But this isn’t a sane country. It’s no exaggeration to say that only an idiot would trust the police or our judiciary. And even an idiot wouldn’t trust our political leaders. Doubtless this stems from the ‘hate’ laws Blair introduced, criminalising speech if someone pretends to feel threatened.
Surely somewhere in the British system, someone is thinking:
Why are we arresting non-criminals for non-crimes, when the vilest and most dangerous walk free; and what effect will this have?
An early-release prisoner in September 2024 killed a man the day he was let out. Starmer made great play of his early-release policy, to attack the Tories. His policy was literally lethal.
The intention behind all this is clear: intimidation and demoralisation of the law-abiding who aren’t left-liberal. Conveniently, they’re so much easier to drag off to the nearest cells. And drug-dealing scumbags – like the early-release killer – aren’t the ones annoying school-governors. If they were, the police would doubtless steer well clear, staying in Greggs or online looking for ‘dangerous tweets’ by old ladies.
It’s often been observed that in the old Soviet Union, actual criminals were treated far more leniently than those convicted of political ‘crimes’. It was routine for the former group to be used for terrorising the latter. This was done deliberately, to show how political dissent was the greatest crime conceivable in the Soviet system.
The same thinking – and method – is policy in Starmer’s government.
This article (POLICE ARREST PARENTS FOR COMPLAINING ABOUT A SCHOOL) was created and published by Paul Sutton and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Britain is completely lost: my thoughts on the latest shocking symbol of our free speech crisis
MATT GOODWIN
There are some images that come to symbol a much wider crisis. And in the years ahead the image you can see above will become one such symbol.
What does it show?
It shows six police offices in the county of Hertfordshire, England, approaching the front door of a house to arrest two parents.
And what was their alleged crime?
Did they assault somebody? Did they steal something? Were they shoplifting? Did they ram their car into a crowded market?
No. They complained about their local school in a parents’ WhatsApp group.
I’m not joking. I’m deadly serious.
Prior to being arrested by no less than six police officers from Hertfordshire Constabulary —which, like other police authorities across England, is struggling to solve burglaries, stop shoplifting and end a surge of violent crime—the parents had dared to question the process through which their local school was recruiting a headteacher and appeared critical of school governors in a WhatsApp group.
All this, apparently, “upset” a few teachers, governors and parents —all of whom, reflecting a much broader sickness that is now afflicting Western societies, chose to prioritise their ‘emotional safety’ and a few hurty words above the free speech and free expression that are the lifeblood of our supposed liberal democracy.
In response, aside from having been excluded from school events, including being prevented from watching their own daughter perform in a school play, Allen and Rosalind Levine were then held by police officers in front of their scared and anxious young daughter before they were fingerprinted, searched and dumped in a police cell for eight hours.
They were then interrogated on suspicion of harassment, malicious communications and causing a nuisance on school property —although the police would later conclude no further action should be taken.
All of which leads me to ask a few questions that will be on the minds of millions of ordinary Brits this weekend as they open their newspapers and phones and read about this shocking case.
Are we living in Britain, once the home of individual liberty and free speech, or some kind of authoritarian regime like North Korea? Because recently it’s become hard to tell the difference between the two.
And in what kind of country, exactly, in what kind of political system, is this kind of police overreach, coercion, censorship, and attempted thought control considered acceptable? The answer is a country that is neither free nor democratic. It is a country that has completely lost its way, a country that is no longer upholding the pillars that support a genuinely free liberal democracy.
And let’s be frank. Britain, as I said on X this morning, is losing its way. We can all see it. We can all feel it. A creeping and increasingly unavoidable sense that we can simply no longer say what we want to say, we can no longer think what we want to think, and we can no longer tell others we are living in a truly free society.
They were then interrogated on suspicion of harassment, malicious communications and causing a nuisance on school property —although the police would later conclude no further action should be taken.
All of which leads me to ask a few questions that will be on the minds of millions of ordinary Brits this weekend as they open their newspapers and phones and read about this shocking case.
Are we living in Britain, once the home of individual liberty and free speech, or some kind of authoritarian regime like North Korea? Because recently it’s become hard to tell the difference between the two.
And in what kind of country, exactly, in what kind of political system, is this kind of police overreach, coercion, censorship, and attempted thought control considered acceptable? The answer is a country that is neither free nor democratic. It is a country that has completely lost its way, a country that is no longer upholding the pillars that support a genuinely free liberal democracy.
And let’s be frank. Britain, as I said on X this morning, is losing its way. We can all see it. We can all feel it. A creeping and increasingly unavoidable sense that we can simply no longer say what we want to say, we can no longer think what we want to think, and we can no longer tell others we are living in a truly free society.
Look around the world for a moment.
From America to Australia, people are either laughing at us or simply shaking their heads in disbelief while asking the same, troubling question that nobody in Westminster appears to want to ask: what the hell is happening to Great Britain?
But let’s be clear. It’s not just this latest scandal that is currently erupting across media which underlines this growing sense of concern and crisis among millions of Brits and onlookers overseas; it’s also reflected, as we have systematically documented right here on this Substack, in a long line of threats to our free speech, free expression, and very democracy.
Think for a moment about all we have seen in recent months.
There was the shocking arrest of Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson after a year-old deleted social media post.
There is the fact that more than 13,000 so-called ‘hate incidents’ have been recorded against British citizens in the last year, all of which erode free speech and stifle genuine debate in the public square.
There’s been the expansion of the deeply Orwellian ‘non-crime hate incidents’ in this country, with hundreds of thousands of these coercive measures being used to try and control the national conversation and put a black mark against people who dare to challenge the woke orthodoxy, such as by voicing unfashionable views on gender, immigration, multiculturalism, and more.
There’s been Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper casually deriding much of the country as “far right” at pretty much every available opportunity after concerned citizens merely dared to express forthright views about mass immigration, Islamism, and a glaring lack of social integration in our visibly fragmenting nation.
There was then, in my view at least, the absurd scene of watching more than a few of those citizens be thrown into jail after sharing their views on social media in the privacy of their own home while actual hardened criminals were released early.
There’s the attempt by the same Labour government to expand the definition of so-called “Islamophobia”, which will almost certainly be used to likewise shut down free speech and debate about the role of Islam in Western societies and indeed whether it is even compatible with our ways of life.
It’s worth remembering, for example, that the original definition of “Islamophobia” that the Labour Party welcomed, in 2018, specifically included the ‘grooming gangs’ (read: rape gangs), alongside discussing the demographic rise of Islam in Western societies, as examples of “Islamophobia”.
And there’s been a concerted effort by this Labour government to pause, water down, and dilute a new law, which I helped design and push through parliament, to uphold free speech on our university campuses, among our young people, which the Labour government only stopped trying to kill once it was dragged through the courts.
So, no, thar chilling image of those six police officers knocking on that front door to arrest those parents for complaining about their local school in a WhatsApp group is not an isolated or freak occurrence, as some people in the establishment would have you believe.
It is merely the latest symbol of our once great country’s free speech crisis —a crisis which, let’s not forget, has been created by both the Tories, who helped mainstream many of these threats to our free speech when they were in power, and now a deeply authoritarian Labour government which like most left-wing parties today will always rush to curb free speech and debate in the name of “social justice” and “diversity”.
What we need in this country more than ever, as again I said on X this morning, which was later shared by Elon Musk, is a genuine political revolution.
A revolution that firmly opposes and pledges to abolish all these authoritarian and deeply Orwellian measures that should have no place in the Britain and England we all know and love.
A revolution that returns us to who we were before the ascendency of the draconian New Labour laws that set the foundation for all this, the hapless Tories who enabled it, and Keir Starmer’s dogmatic Labour government which is now putting this crisis on steroids.
A revolution that returns us to a country that understands it is defined foremost by an unwavering commitment to freedom in all its forms —freedom from authoritarian censorship, freedom from extremist ideologues, freedom from totalitarian institutions, and freedom from any other threats to the one thing that has long defined these islands —individual liberty.
Because if there is one thing that defines the British and the English people more than anything then it is their unwavering willingness to defend freedom against the kind of authoritarian and dogmatic ideologies that led those six police officers to knock on that front door to begin with. What the people want is freedom —and they want it now.
This article (Britain is completely lost: my thoughts on the latest shocking symbol of our free speech crisis) was created and published by Matt Goodwin and is republished here under “Fair Use”
*****
Genuinely Shocked & Alarmed
The video discusses the arrest of parents due to comments made in a private WhatsApp group about a school, and highlights the concerning increase of police involvement over private communications and the implications of such actions on free speech.
WATCH:
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply