Thermometers in parking lots, biased adjustments, and ignored rural data—how climate agencies distorted the record.
TOM NELSON
The graph they built is a lie. The iconic ‘climate’ graph that’s undermining industrial capitalism and taking our freedom…and it’s 100 percent garbage. Watch this film, and learn the shocking truth with @tomnelson2080
Look up climate change on the internet
Or check out any mainstream media story about climate change, and you’ll see this graph. This one’s from NOAA, and there’s an almost identical one from NASA. This is the graph for climate alarmists.
We know the Earth is warming, and the Arctic is melting. Unless we make major changes to stop global warming, the consequences could be irreversible.
This is the graph on which all of those claims about record temperatures are based.
We’re starting to see our temperature on the increase—that’s well stated, well advertised. We see an acceleration of warming over the past 50 years. From 1801 till now, the numbers all say the same thing: the world is getting warmer, faster.
This is the graph that is said by the science TV presenter Brian Cox to prove that global warming is true—human action is leading to an increase in average temperatures.
You may try to argue with that, but you can’t.
“No, I brought the graph!”
But, as we will see in this film, this famous graph is a travesty—a shameful lie masquerading as science.
Read full script at Climate Realism
See Related Article Below
Antarctic and Arctic Ice Trends Defy Climate Models And Dire Predictions
PROF. FRITZ VAHRENHOLT with PIERRE GOSSELIN
The Ice of Antarctica is Increasing
Looking at the climate website of the Helmholtz Association, with the ambitious name “Climate Facts” under Antarctica, you will read the following: “The important mainland ice of Antarctica is disappearing and at an increasing rate”. [emphasis, links added]
According to the Helmholtz Association, this is important for rising sea levels. And indeed, rising sea levels from melting Antarctic ice are one of the central arguments of climate policy that has worried people.
This finding makes the results of a recently published study, which shows a shift in the Antarctic ice landscape since 2021, all the more remarkable: Antarctica’s mainland ice is increasing again.
Chinese researchers from Tongji University and led by Prof. Shen and Dr. Wang found that Antarctic ice masses have increased significantly since 2021.
The data evaluated from NASA’s GRACE satellite detected an annual loss of 74 billion tons per year from 2002 to 2010. From 2011 to 2020, the amount doubled. Now the ice has increased by around 108 billion tons year on year.
As the melting of the Antarctic glaciers contributed around 20% to sea level rise, a slowdown in the rise has been observed since 2021. Wouldn’t this good news be worth reporting on the news? Not so far.
A second piece of good news also not being reported by German Tagesschau news or political Berlin: Arctic sea ice has not decreased for over 10 years.
A recent publication by Mark England from the University of Exeter and Lorenzo Polvani from Columbia University in New York has drawn attention to Arctic sea ice.
The researchers report a decades-long break in the decline of Arctic sea ice, and they expect it to continue for at least the next 5-10 years.
As recently as 2009, John Kerry, US climate envoy, sounded the alarm that the Arctic would be ice-free in 2013. The reality turned out differently [see figure below].
The decline in Arctic sea ice up to 2012 is well documented by satellite measurements, as is the subsequent stabilization and slight recovery. The annual September minimum is used for comparison.
Following the strong warming of recent years, a renewed decline was expected. But the sea ice remains stable.
Yet, this clear measurement data did not prevent German Tagesschau news from reporting that on March 28, 2025, the decline in sea ice was continuing, with serious consequences for the climate system.
And we are still paying broadcasting fees for such false information, which only serves political purposes.
Climate science in crisis?
Climate model forecasts are increasingly deviating from reality. Axel Bojanowski spoke to two scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg.
Prof. Bjorn Stevens and Prof. Jochem Marotzke speak of a crisis in climate science. Marotzke notes:
“The current class of climate models is running into too many contradictions with reality.”
Marotzke is concerned about the great uncertainty of the models. He cites the following examples:
“In large parts of the world, the models contradict each other on the question of whether it will rain more or less in the future. The warming of the Earth’s surface between 1998 and 2012 was significantly slower than predicted by the models (“hiatus”).
“Since 1979, the tropical eastern Pacific has cooled, contrary to the expectations of all models that simulate warming there.”
Concerning climate science, Marotzke speaks of “the other climate crisis”. “This is the moment for a paradigm shift.”
My impression: some clever scientists are now realizing that by pointing to unwavering statements of climate models, they have led politicians to bring much hardship upon their peoples because they wanted to avoid the impending catastrophe too quickly with completely inappropriate measures.
The statements of the UN will be remembered: “Only renewable energies are the exit from the highway to climate hell.” —UN Secretary-General Guterres
Or: “Greenhouse gas emissions have clearly caused global warming, with the global surface temperature in 2011-2020 about 1.1°C above the 1850-1900 level.” —IPCC 2023, Synthesis report A1
Climate models “no longer reflect reality.”
These statements are based on climate models that, according to Marotzke, require a paradigm shift because they no longer reflect reality with accuracy after just a few years.
When will there be a paradigm shift in climate policy in this country?
Top photo by Robert Haverly on Unsplash
Read more at No Tricks Zone
*****
The Climate Crisis Is Not Our Temperature. It Is Institutions Corrupted by Groupthink, Rent-Seeking, and Power Lust.
VIJAY JAYARAJ
Guest Post from Vijay Jayaraj at the CO2 Coalition.
Kooky tales about Antarctica abound – including the presence of UFOs, a lost civilization and a passage to Earth’s interior. All are generally dismissed as absurd. Yet, some widely accepted claims about climate change and ice sheets at the planet’s southernmost end are equally far-fetched.
The world is told daily that rising CO2 levels are melting polar ice, shrinking crop yields, and pushing humanity toward extinction. “Institute radical decarbonization or we’re all dead!” is the cry of our enlightened overlords, as if swapping incandescent bulbs for LEDs and banning gas cars would spare us from their predicted apocalypse. They demand immediate economic hara-kiri to avoid weather predictions based on pseudoscience and outright deception.
.
Real-world data – from Brazil’s record harvests to the rebound of Antarctica’s ice – expose the climate crusade for the baseless hysteria that it is.
Brazil’s agricultural triumph
The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics projects cereals, legumes, and oilseeds to reach more than 325 million metric tons of production this year, an 11% increase over 2024.
Production of soybeans, another cornerstone crop of global food security, is expected to hit 161 million metric tons in Brazil, a 6% jump from the previous year, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Foreign Agricultural Service. Brazil’s National Supply Corporation forecasts total grain production to be more than 322 million metric tons, up over 8% from the prior harvest, as rice leads with an increase of nearly 10% in planted area.
What does this mean for you? These numbers are evidence of a thriving agricultural sector that feeds millions worldwide. Brazil’s success challenges dire warnings from the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) of rising CO2 and temperatures disrupting agriculture.
Warmer climates and higher CO2 levels are enhancing plant growth, as warmth extends growing seasons and CO2 acts as a natural fertilizer, facts that are evident across the globe.
Antarctica’s ice rebound
Far south of Brazil, in the freezing landscape of Antarctica, another climate myth is derailed. A poster child of climate disaster forecasts, Antarctica is adding to its inventory of ice for the first time in decades. Recent data reveal that Antarctica’s ice sheet is growing. Between 2021 and 2023, Antarctic ice gained mass at a rate of approximately 108 metric gigatons per year, driven by anomalous precipitation accumulation.
This marks the first sustained ice growth in decades and should be headline news. The melting of polar ice has long been used to justify urgent policy interventions – from net-zero mandates to oil and gas restrictions to agricultural taxes. We were told rising CO₂ meant inevitable ice loss and catastrophic sea-level rise. But when the ice grows instead of shrinks, the climate establishment barely flinches.
Why are the people most entrusted with global climate policy ignoring or dismissing data like this? And more importantly, why are policymakers doubling down on economically destructive climate agendas when the physical world is contradicting their models?
Some independent researchers, farmers and energy analysts have raised red flags about flawed assumptions underlying the climate narrative. But they are often silenced or labeled “deniers” – a term designed to shut down inquiry rather than invite discussion.
Record crops and growing ice sheets are empirical evidence that challenges climate orthodoxy. Ignoring this information is not only unscientific but also immoral.
The IPCC, the supposed gold standard for climate science, has built entire policy frameworks around the assumption of irreversible polar ice loss and inevitable climate collapse from the use of fossil fuels. These frameworks have been adopted wholesale by politicians like Canada’s Mark Carney, England’s Keir Starmer, Australia’s Anthony Albanese, California’s Gavin Newsom and others.
So, what happens when nature refuses to follow their political scripts? Nothing. The policy train keeps moving, fueled by inertia, institutional pride and personal hubris. The crisis is not in our atmosphere. It is in institutions corrupted by groupthink, rent-seeking and lust for power.
Until some measure of integrity is restored to scientific and political leadership, the real catastrophe is the collapse of trust in those designated to protect liberty, engender economic growth and allow for the continued advancement of human civilization.
This commentary was first published at BizPac Review on May 9, 2025.
Vijay Jayaraj is a Research Associate at the CO2 Coalition, Arlington, Virginia. He holds a master’s degree in environmental sciences from the University of East Anglia, U.K., and a postgraduate degree in energy management from Robert Gordon University, U.K.
This article (The Climate Crisis Is Not Our Temperature. It Is Institutions Corrupted by Groupthink, Rent-Seeking, and Power Lust.) was created and published by Energy Security and Freedom and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Vijay JAYARAJ
Featured image: Adobe Stock
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply