Epstein’s eugenics: how to get rid of poor people
NIALL MCCRAE
Some critics say that Jeffery Epstein’s proven and alleged involvement in sexual abuse of children is a distraction from his much more damaging impact on global finance. I’m no accountant or economist, but it seems likely that the corrupt financier, who represented the Rothschilds and other members of the elite, was a major contributor to the redistribution of wealth from the masses to the super-rich, a trend accelerated by the Covid-19 regime and steadily advanced by Net Zero.
The latest release of ‘Epstein files’ has caused division in independent media, some believing that the documents and images confirm rampant paedophilia on the upper rungs of power, others dismissing the whole scandal as a hoax. We cannot be sure of anything that is presented to us, as we are always being manipulated. But I believe that many of the messages released to the public are probably genuine, and there are revelations that go far beyond any depravities on Little St James and the ‘Lolita Express’.
A hundred years ago was the heyday of eugenics. The official narrative is that this pseudoscience was a fad, before it was put into practice by the Third Reich and then the civilised world said ‘never again’. That’s a distortion of the truth. As explained in my book Green in Tooth and Claw, the misanthropic agenda continued after the Second World War, when Julian Huxley, first director of UNESCO, conveyed a message that I paraphrased as ‘eugenics is dead; long live eugenics’. The rebranding was in the colour of green, rationalised by ecological doom and a contrived climate crisis.
Was Covid-19 not an exercise in eugenics? Millions died from the radical interventions taken to quell a fake virus, such as discharging older patients from hospitals, widespread use of midazolam for ‘terminal care’, and deaths caused by multiple shots of a hazardous ‘vaccine’. Well, the latest Epstein files show that the unlovable rogue was in cahoots with Bill Gates on planning the pandemic.
Epstein was released from jail in 2009 after his conviction of soliciting a child for prostitution, but that didn’t deter the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation from arranging meetings with him and leading scientists. ‘We are going to have fun’, he wrote in reply to Boris Nikolic, scientific adviser to the BMGF, who had suggested several ‘rising stars’ for Epstein to meet. Epstein may be known for his perverted interest in children, but he was also enthused by vaccines, mentioning on 24th September 2009 ‘my big idea’, which apparently relates to the potential development of a single vaccine against all viruses. In January 2010 he was discussing mRNA.
In 2013 an agreement was made between Gates, Nikoloc and Epstein on their working relationship. Sayer Ji, who has carefully scrutinised the documents, found that Epstein and Gates were working on pandemics as a business model. In the years preceding the Event 201 simulation that was immediately followed by the Covid-19 outbreak, the Epstein files show protracted discussions on pandemic preparedness, with Nikolic suggesting a ‘donor advised fund’
This is intriguing, but it gets worse. An intriguing e-mail sent to Epstein on 4th February 2011by Hollywood movie producer Barry Josephson asks:-
I’ve been thinking about that question you asked bill gates ‘how do we get rid of poor people as a whole’ and I have an answer / comment regarding that for you…when can I call you today to discuss this?
Josephson did not commit his words of wisdom to writing. The e-mail is open to interpretation, as was an assertion made by Bill Gates at a TED Talk in 2010: –
The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps ten to fifteen per-cent.
For this remark Gates was the subject of depopulation conspiracy theory, and emphatic establishment defence. Was Gates simply stating a truth that better health and contraception leading to fewer babies being born in poorer parts of the world? His detractors took his words more literally: here was Gates openly calling for a cull of hundreds of millions of people.
Perhaps Epstein, as quoted by Josephson, was meaning eradication of what makes people poor rather than the poor people themselves. But as commented on Novara Media, use of Occam’s razor would reject all but the obvious message. Epstein is no socialist or human rights advocate, after all. People, from the weak to the powerful, are pawns to him: they exist to be herded, injected, abused, encouraged to abuse, and blackmailed.
According to a New York Times article (31 July 2019), Epstein wanted to seed the human race with his superior quality of genes. Epstein hosted scientific salons at his Manhattan apartment, and neuropsychologist Steven Pinker was invited by Harvard professor of mathematics and biology Martin Nowak. Pinker described Epstein as an ‘intellectual impostor’ who repeatedly disrupted serious dialogue with an ‘adolescent wisecrack’. At one session at Harvard, Epstein criticised efforts to prevent starvation and improve healthcare to the poor, because this would increase the risk of overpopulation. Pinker told Epstein that high infant mortality causes the poorest people to have more children. He was not invited again.
In other e-mails, if we are to accept their veracity, Epstein uses the derogatory term ‘goyim’ for Gentiles. He was almost certainly running a blackmail operation for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency that had previous engaged the services of Robert Maxwell, whose daughter Ghislaine was Epstein’s partner in crime. The message about getting rid of poor people, in my view, aligns with supremacist contempt for the ordinary people, for whom the prospects are bleak due to rapidly advancing technology; their culminating status is of ‘useless eaters’ (as described by World Economic Forum scientific advisor Yuval Noah Hariri).
The purpose of the release (for there must be a motive) may be apocalyptic – literally, removing the veil. We lesser mortals are being shown that might is right, and that our existence is at the mercy of a technocratic tyranny devoid of any sentimentality or compassion. The ruling elite will impoverish us, demoralise us, enslave us and – let’s not beat about the bush – exterminate us. Whether you regard this as Satanic depends on your spiritual perspective, but clearly humanity is facing an existential crisis.
You may have faith in good triumphing over evil, but we are at the thin end of the wedge, and our lives will surely get much worse before they get better. Perhaps we should be grateful to Epstein for the heads-up.
This article (Epstein’s eugenics: how to get rid of poor people) was created and published by Niall McCrae and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Video Below
The Mandelson Epstein Scandal Just Got MUCH Worse… And Nobody’s Talking About It
The Peter Mandelson scandal just escalated — and the newly released documents linking him to Jeffrey Epstein raise serious questions about government secrecy, financial influence, and political accountability.
After reviewing millions of pages of Department of Justice records, this investigation breaks down newly uncovered evidence, documented communications, and major contradictions in Peter Mandelson’s public defence. The files suggest confidential UK government information may have been shared with Jeffrey Epstein during Mandelson’s time as Business Secretary, alongside unexplained financial transfers and a long-standing personal relationship.
This video examines the timeline of the Mandelson–Epstein connection, the political fallout in Britain, and why multiple investigations are now underway.
The story raises major questions about:
• Government transparency
• Political influence and financial networks
• National security concerns
• The wider impact of the Epstein files globally
• Accountability within British politics
This is a deep dive into one of the most controversial political scandals currently unfolding in the UK.
Sources & Documents Referenced
This investigation is based on publicly released records, reporting from multiple investigative journalists, and official document releases. You can view the source transcript and research summary here:
SOURCES & FURTHER READING:
📄 DOJ Epstein File Release (3.5 million pages): https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/depart…
📄 Tax Policy Associates — Mandelson leaked No10 documents to Epstein: https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/02/02/m…
📄 Tax Policy Associates — Mandelson told JPMorgan to “mildly threaten” Chancellor: https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/02/01/e… 📄 Tax Policy Associates — Could Mandelson be prosecuted? https://taxpolicy.org.uk/2026/02/11/m…
📄 Bureau of Investigative Journalism + BBC Verify — Villa “guests” email: https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com…
📄 Declassified UK — Mandelson asked Epstein for Israel advice: https://www.declassifieduk.org/reveal…
📄 Bloomberg — Mandelson shared UK government emails with Epstein: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl…
📄 Al Jazeera — How the Epstein-Mandelson files rocked the UK government: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2…
📄 PBS — UK fires Ambassador Mandelson over Epstein emails: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/u-…
📄 PBS — Police search Mandelson properties: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics…
📄 PBS — Prince Andrew trade documents to Epstein: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/uk…
📄 PBS — Ro Khanna: “Epstein files scrubbed to protect elite powerful men”: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/eps…
📄 Hansard — Commons debate: Lord Mandelson (4 Feb 2026): https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons…
📄 Hansard — Lords debate: US DOJ Release of Files (5 Feb 2026): https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2…
📄 Foreign Policy — Should Starmer resign? https://foreignpolicy.com/2026/02/10/…
WATCH:
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply