The British government has begun aggressively extending its censorship regime beyond its borders, invoking the sweeping powers granted by the Online Safety Act 2023 to demand compliance from foreign-based platforms. Pro-free speech websites like Gab and Kiwi Farms are among the first targets in this international campaign to enforce the UK’s standards of “online safety” — a term critics argue is being used as a smokescreen for state-sanctioned thought control.
Gab, a US-based platform known for its staunch defense of First Amendment protections, has refused to capitulate. The UK’s Office of Communications (Ofcom) is threatening the company with crushing penalties—up to £18M ($23.3M) or 10% of global revenue — for failing to submit to British censorship demands. Gab, in turn, is reporting the UK government to the United States Trade Representative and the Department of Justice, calling for retaliation and the imposition of trade tariffs.
Gab CEO Andrew Torba and his team did not mince words in their response. “We will not pay one cent,” their statement declared, emphasizing that Gab will not yield to what it describes as “tyrannical demands” from a foreign government.
The platform asserts that the UK’s attempt to dictate speech policies to an American company constitutes a dangerous precedent — one where governments believe they can impose their domestic laws globally, chilling free expression in the process.
The notice Gab received from Ofcom, dated March 26, 2025, demanded a response by March 16 — a nonsensical timeline and blunder that Gab used to highlight what it sees as the reckless, bureaucratic overreach driving this censorship push.
The company has called on its users to rally in defense of digital free speech and to contribute financially to ongoing legal and technical efforts to resist.
Meanwhile, Kiwi Farms — a forum often targeted by legacy media for its unfiltered content — has responded in its own way. Visitors from the UK are met with a blunt message: “You are accessing this website from the United Kingdom. This is not a good idea.” The page links directly to the Ofcom letters sent to the site, which claim jurisdiction over any platform with a “significant number” of UK users — a nebulous standard that could apply to nearly any global site.
What users in the UK see when they now visit Kiwi Farms from the UK.
Kiwi Farms warns UK users that their online activity is no longer private, noting that without Cloudflare’s IP masking (which they no longer use), British authorities can directly monitor where citizens connect. The site advises UK users to employ VPNs or Tor for protection and makes clear its refusal to subject itself to foreign censorship edicts.
Free speech supporters see the Online Safety Act as a deeply flawed regulation, part of a broader, deliberate strategy to quash dissent and sanitize online spaces. Gab explicitly warns that failure to resist this extraterritorial push could spell doom for other US tech firms, stating, “If they let the UK censor us, every other American tech company is next.”
This episode echoes earlier confrontations — Gab, for instance, was deplatformed in 2018 by hosting providers and payment processors due to its refusal to comply with subjective “hate speech” enforcement standards. Yet the platform has not wavered. Its leadership maintains that free expression must remain a non-negotiable principle, even when it means standing alone against powerful state actors.
The UK’s aggressive approach to global internet governance has now drawn the ire of platforms that were never subject to its jurisdiction. Whether this escalating standoff will trigger broader geopolitical consequences — particularly if the US government steps in — remains to be seen. But one thing is clear: the battle over who controls the flow of information online is entering a new, more dangerous phase. And for platforms like Gab and Kiwi Farms, surrender is not an option.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply