‘Clean energy’ kills wildlife, scars landscapes, and fails when it’s needed most.
PAUL DRIESSEN
“Poor Jud is dead. A candle lights his head! He’s looking oh so pretty and so nice. He looks like he’s asleep. It’s a shame that he won’t keep. But it’s summer and we’re running out of ice.” [emphasis, links added]
In Oklahoma! Curly McClain almost succeeds in convincing Jud Fry to take himself (permanently) out of the competition for Laurey Williams’ hand. But Jud finally catches on to Curly’s clever scheme and angrily confronts the musical’s leading man.
Offstage, in the real world, historian Arnold Toynbee cautioned, “Civilizations die from suicide, not by murder.”
Their citizens forget, or reject, the reasons for their accomplishments, health, and living standards; replace hard work with self-absorption and a sense of entitlement, and succumb to the belief that the world would be better if they eliminated evils like borders, citizenship, religion, and fossil fuels.
“Imagine there’s no countries … Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion, too.”
Indeed, the Left has been devilishly ingenious in its efforts to lure the United States, Europe, and the West into committing civilizational suicide by fearmongering that the planet’s very existence is at stake, and promising that future generations will praise us if we follow “progressive” demands.
Above all, the Left assures us, replacing oil, coal, natural gas, and nuclear power with “clean, renewable, sustainable” wind and solar energy will ensure idyllic temperatures, a perfect climate all year, planetary salvation, and everlasting hosannahs.
Those tempted by these sirens’ calls should ponder my grandmother’s sage adage: “The only good thing about the ‘good old days’ is that they’re gone.”
Having grown up on a nineteenth-century farm, Grandma Anna never wanted to live again without indoor plumbing, electricity, or refrigerators that replaced ice boxes, ice houses, and the risk of “running out of ice” before the next Wisconsin winter set in.
Terror attacks, judicial interference, and Blue State resistance notwithstanding, Trump Administration and congressional actions on these fronts suggest that the United States will at least forestall, if not reject, national suicide.
Much of Europe, however, seems headed for energy and civilizational collapse.
“Grooming gangs” sexually exploiting young girls, vehicular rampages and knife attacks, frequent gang rapes, enclaves of assimilation-rejecting migrants, and native populations whose lower birthrates make it likely that legal and illegal immigrants will soon dominate demographics, cultures and elections – all are harbingers of slow but steady civilizational decline across much of Europe.
Prolonging these problems, from Britain to France to Germany, ruling liberal/socialist elites are shutting down conservative voices and even entire parties that question or challenge government ideologies on climate change, the energy “transition” to wind and solar, open borders, and free speech.
Germany’s domestic intelligence service officially classified the popular, populist, anti-green-energy Alternative fűr Deutschland as a “proven far-right extremist” organization; AfD could now be subjected to informants and secret recordings and even banned from future elections.
Perhaps worst of all, Europe may be entering not just a new intellectual Dark Age, but a North Korea-style darkness age – where energy is scarce and costly, factories close, jobs disappear, lighting and heating become luxuries, and governments increasingly control lives, livelihoods, and living standards.
Germany and Britain already have among the highest household, business, and industrial electricity prices on Earth (nearly 3x higher than average US prices; 3-4x higher than in 30 states).
Yet they refuse to frack for natural gas to power generators or build nuclear plants for reliable, affordable electricity … while demanding electric vehicles and heating, and importing more Russian gas to finance Putin’s war machine.
(US states focused on climate and “green” energy also have outrageously high electricity prices.)
Reliability is equally problematic.
On April 16, Spain was euphoric: wind, solar, and hydropower provided 100% of its electricity. Twelve days later, a long blackout plunged the country into chaos.
No lights, refrigerators, TVs, or cell phones; no trains, subways, traffic lights, or flights; cash only because credit cards didn’t work; hospitals had only limited backup power; people died.
Sunny net-zero Spain has 32 gigawatts of installed solar photovoltaic capacity, blanketing over 315 square miles (5x Washington, DC) with solar panels.
But the panels generate power intermittently, unreliably, at only 17% of their rated capacity overall. When solar generation surges (or plummets), its aging grid cannot handle the strain or meet power demands.
The heavily wind-solar Spanish electrical system lacks the “inertia” or “spinning mass” that gas and nuclear power plants provide: the innate ability to respond quickly to changes in demand, prevent fluctuations in voltage and available power, maintain grid stability, and prevent blackouts.
And Spain’s few remaining gas and nuclear plants were mostly offline when needed on April 28.
Experts estimate that the EU power grid requires at least a $1-trillion upgrade to avoid similar blackouts. The International Energy Agency says Europe must spend $600 billion a year to cover the necessary overhauls; the European Commission puts the grid-upgrade tab at over $2 trillion by 2050.
Net-zero US states risk similar electricity chaos, financial catastrophes, and economic decline.
The obvious best example is California, which already imports 20-30 percent of its electricity, depending on wind and sunshine, and increasing amounts of gasoline, as regulations, fines, and costs force more refineries to close. The state is also plagued by recurring power outages.
The looming closure of Valero’s Benicia refinery will not only eliminate local jobs and revenues.
It will leave California drivers with less fuel (just as EV drivers have to cope with reduced electricity generation), compel the oil-rich former Golden State to import even more fuel from Asia (adding tanker costs and emissions to the equation), deprive Nevada and Arizona of fuels its residents need – and leave Travis Air Force Base largely bereft of fuels for its cargo, refueling and other aircraft.
Here’s the inescapable reality: Wind, solar, and grid-scale battery power are not clean, green, renewable, or sustainable.
These installations and transmission lines blanket scenic, cropland, and habitats. They slaughter raptors and kill off other wildlife. The batteries catch fire with dangerous regularity.
Their massive raw material requirements mean mining, processing, manufacturing, pollution, and further ecosystem impacts at historically unprecedented scales to build inefficient, insufficient, but hugely expensive energy systems.
Then those systems must be backed up with additional, duplicative, reliable power generation for the hours, days, and weeks when wind and sunshine fail to do their job, adding more charges to electricity bills.
And wind and solar do nothing to replace the oil and gas feedstocks needed to manufacture over 6,000 vital everyday products.
Here’s a better idea: Keep producing coal, oil, and gas—and relying on coal, gas, and nuclear power plants.
Scrap plans for new wind, solar, and battery systems … and junk the ones we have. And stop basing energy policy on GIGO climate models that conjure up absurd temperature, weather, and other cataclysms.
That’s simple energy, economic, and scientific common sense, and that means America doesn’t have to commit economic and cultural suicide.
Paul Driessen is a senior policy analyst for the Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (www.CFACT.org) and the author of books and articles on energy, environment, climate change, and human rights issues.
This article (https://climatechangedispatch.com/green-energy-suicide-the-west-pays-the-price-for-its-net-zero-delusions/) was created and published by Climate Change Dispatch and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Paul Driessen
See Related Article Below
How Wind And Solar Sent Energy Prices Sky-High in ‘Green’ Countries
People in renewable-heavy countries pay more for power that still relies on fossil fuel backup.
BJORN LOMBORG
Ask families in Germany and the UK what happens when more and more supposedly “cheap” solar and wind power is added to the national power mix, and they can tell you by looking at their utility bills: It gets far more expensive. [emphasis, links added]
The idea that power should get cheaper as we get more green energy is only true if we exclusively use electricity when the sun is shining and the wind is blowing.
But modern societies need power around the clock. When there is no sun and wind, green energy needs plenty of backup, often powered by fossil fuels. What this means is that we pay for not one but two power systems.
And as the backup fossil fuel power sources are used less, they need to earn their capital costs back in fewer hours, leading to even more expensive power.
This means the real energy costs of solar and wind are far higher.
One study looking at China showed that the real cost of solar power on average turns out to be twice as high as coal, while a peer-reviewed study of Germany and Texas shows solar and wind are many times more expensive than fossil fuels.
Germany and the UK now have so much “low-cost” solar and wind that their electricity costs have become among the world’s most expensive.
The latest data from the International Energy Agency make it clear that there is a strong and clear correlation between more solar and wind and much higher average energy prices for households and industries.
In a country with little or no solar and wind, the average electricity cost is a bit over 11¢ per kilowatt-hour.
For every 10 percentage points of solar and wind, the cost increases by more than 4¢. The results are nearly similar for 2019, before any impacts of COVID and the Ukraine war.
Look at Germany, where 34¢ per kWh is more than twice the US cost and nearly four times the Chinese price.
Countries that use a higher percentage of solar and wind power tend to have higher energy prices per household. Mike Guillen/NY Post Design
Germany has installed so much solar and wind that, at full capacity, it could produce two times Germany’s electricity demand.
In reality, on days with plenty of wind and sun, renewable energy produces close to 70% of Germany’s needs. Such days get excited press attention.
The press hardly mentions the days that are dark and still. Twice this winter, when all of Europe was cloudy and nearly windless, solar and wind delivered less than 4% of the daily power Germany needed.
Battery technology can’t cope: Germany’s entire battery storage runs out in about 20 minutes.
That leaves more than 23 hours of energy that needs to be powered mostly by fossil fuels. The result: During these lulls, Germany saw some of the costliest power prices, with wholesale prices reaching a phenomenal $1 per kWh.
At least climate-enthused governments in Europe are generally honest about these costs because electricity prices include most of the solar and wind costs, so consumers see the impact of green energy policies.
In the US, however, solar and wind costs are paid indirectly through tax deductions, implying that the actual cost of electricity with solar and wind is perhaps 25% higher than stated prices.
Poor countries are especially hurt by the lie of cheap green energy. Rich countries now refuse to help poor countries with fossil-fuel projects.
If solar and wind really were cheaper, the world’s poorer countries would have an inexpensive way to leapfrog from today’s energy poverty to energy abundance.
New energy infrastructure would all be solar and wind. Yet this only happens in rich countries, where electricity consumption is declining, while generous subsidies and a large, existing fossil fuel backup infrastructure make our solar and wind deception possible.
Read rest at NY Post
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply