by Kieron McFaddenIn a nutshellPropaganda is neither scary nor effective as soon as you can see what is being done and the tricks that are being played by scumbags with “information”, words, meaning and so forth.
MAXIM: increased understanding is the antidote to propaganda
Many experts are now pointing out that we have achieved herd immunity (see this article by Dr Mike Williams for example).
The achievement of herd immunity, a natural occurrence when a disease with a not particularly high fatality rate runs its course, as is the case with COVID19, negates the need for mass vaccination.
This does not necessarily negate the need for a vaccine to protect the small minority of people who, by reasons of old age or pre-existing serious health issues, are vulnerable, PROVIDED the vaccine is properly researched and proven less fatal or risky than the disease being vaccinated against (which is very much in doubt concerning the COVID19 vax.)
However, in the case of the current smoke-and-mirrors pandemic, the achievement of herd immunity is one of the problems that has thrown a spanner in the works of the drive to get everybody to submit to the vaccine the government and its handlers are so spookily obsessed with injecting into people who don’t need it.
The fact that they are so obsessed with getting the populace to submit to a vaccine to “deal with” a disease that is not dangerous for the vast majority and has an average age of fatality of eighty-ruddy-two should set our alarm bells ringing.
We would be very very wise to start questioning the narrative at this point with questions such as
Why?
What’s in it that you are so desperate for us to be injected with?
Oh! They say. The pandemic! This fatal disease! etcetera
If it were a vax to fight off a naturally occurring (or lab-created) mass killer that is slaughtering the populace, one could understand this obsession with a vaccine – if one assumes that the political/corporate elite have taken time out from warmongering, GMOs, toxic chemicals, drugs, population culling, financing daft politicians and other methods of slaughtering the populace to suddenly become all concerned about the plebs, riffraff and hoipolloi being slaughtered.
But it isn’t. No amount of spin, fiddling the stats or demented prime ministerial twaddle changes the fact that it is on a par with flu.
Something else is driving this unrelenting obsession with getting the populace vaccinated and we rally need these dopes to ‘fess up and tell us what it is.
In the meantime, that obsession spurs all manner of deceit and trickery to herd us in the general direction of their vaccine trap.
That includes using the Daft Arts of propaganda in an effort to hoodwink the populace.
One of the favourite tricks of the propagandist is to slyly change the definition of words.
The definition of “herd immunity” is a contemporary example.
The actual accepted meaning and what all the experts and so forth mean when they say “we have achieved or nearly achieved her immunity” is this:
” . . . happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection. This means that even people who haven’t been infected, or in whom an infection hasn’t triggered an immune response, they are protected because people around them who are immune can act as buffers between them and an infected person. . . . is when a population becomes protected against a virus because enough people have been infected with it to create community immunity.” as originally defined on the WHO’s site.
The new, slyly altered WHO definition and the meaning they and governments and so forth are using when they say “oh no we haven’t achieved herd immunity and all those saying we have are cranks crooks and conspiracy theorists” is:
“‘Herd immunity’, also known as ‘population immunity’, is a concept used for vaccination, in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached, . . . Herd immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus, not by exposing them to it . . . Herd immunity’ exists when a high percentage of the population is vaccinated,”
Thus now states their website, completely omitting the original meaning of “herd immunity,” which is when a population becomes immune to a virus by being exposed to it.
See what they did there?
In effect they have more or less arbitrarily changed the definition of the term to portray the opposite of what it means!
They really are that slippery and there are some dark insidious intellects at work behind all this, intellects who evidently regard you and the rest of your human brothers and sisters as some sort of vermin to be put down (or am I getting a bit carried away by the evidence?)
Whatever the full truth of all this, it is not a wise idea to place people that sly and slimy in charge of your health.
There is a more in-depth article featured in The Liberty Beacon. We highly recommend you give it a read and arm yourself with knowledge.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply