Corporations Setting Up in the UK’s Deregulated SEZs Are Known for Chasing 10-Year ‘Tax Holidays’

Corporations setting up in the UK’s deregulated SEZs are known for chasing 10-year ‘tax holidays’

What’s good for companies in SEZs becomes a living hell for workers and residents entrapped in these free zones.

EUROPEANPOWELL

Corporations setting up in deregulated SEZs are known for chasing 10-year ‘tax holidays’, reduced business rates, land grabbing via Compulsory Purchase Orders, banning Trade Unions, lowering of minimum wage, longer work hours, limited toilet breaks, excessive surveillance of workers, tiny state pensions due to companies not paying social security contributions to the state, and permanent sweatshop phases.

From the UK Govt’s website

https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/122185/pdf

Stamp duty – 100% relief for land and buildings bought for commercial use or development. Business rates – 100% relief on newly occupied or expanded premises. Investment in plant and machinery – 100% first-year capital allowance for qualifying expenditure. Investment in buildings – taxable profits reduced by 10% a year of the value of qualifying non-residential investment, rising to 100% over ten years. Employer’s NI contributions – zero rate on new employees working on the site for at least 60% of their time, up to an earnings threshold of £25,000 p.a., for three years per employee.

Each Investment Zone in England is to be led by the Mayoral Combined Authority with the involvement of a wide range of local players. Local universities are expected to play a prominent role and local MPs are to be engaged in developing the plans. Central government’s approval will be required. The lead authority will be allowed to keep 100% of the increase in Business Rates on the Investment Zone sites for 25 years.

The glossy brochure version of free zones masks one key fact that Starmer announced a short while ago to 700 lobbyists during a webinar, that governance powers are to be handed over to corporations with the UK Govt taking a ‘secondary position’.

This means companies signed up to SEZs can self-regulate under what is known in libertarian parlance as ‘Adam Smith’s Invisible Hand’ Lastly, the State aid companies signed up for in the UK’s 86 free zones is public money, ordinary people are paying to allow companies numerous corporate tax breaks, (see above) along with a deregulatory framework separate from the host country, companies now have the ability to make serious incursions into the public infrastructure without having to worry about public or parliamentary scrutiny, because secondary legislation was written into the 25-year licenses.

The UK’s 86 free zones also have a secret corporate justice court that can bypass domestic courts during arbitration disputes where outcomes for corporations allow them to sue the govt for billions in damages, do you know what those damages are? They are when a company believes its rights to pollute the environment, create modern-day slavery, make faulty products have been infringed upon by the Govt.

The corporate justice court is called the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), there is also an equivalent mechanism known as Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) which was set up by The World Bank in 1966, ISDS was written into all post Brexit free trade deals known as CPTPP.


This article (Corporations setting up in the UK’s deregulated SEZs are known for chasing 10-year ‘tax holidays’) was created and published by EuropeanPowell and is republished here under “Fair Use”

See Related Article Below

Liverpool SEZ/Freeport signed off by Labour’s Mayor Steve Rotheram is a mess of private equity buyouts and glossy brochure failures.

‘Let Us Growth’


EUROPEANPOWELL

The Liverpool SEZ/Freeport that was signed off by Labour Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram is a mess of private equity buyouts and glossy brochure failures. A £20m buyout deal from US-based Elanco Animal Health has swooped in to buy US Pharmaceutical TriRx Speke manufacturing plant south Liverpool, which collapsed into administration in September 2024 TriRx was heralded as an auspicious boon to the Liverpool SEZ with promises of 4000 jobs, Elanco’s buyout reduces that figure to 300 jobs.

TriRx is a crucial part of Elanco’s supply chain, supplying a number of farm animal product lines that generates more than £100m in revenues a year. TriRx was a key element of a plan to create a £320m life sciences Investment Zone. TriRx announced a £10m investment into the facility. Labour Metro Mayor Steve Rotheram was a board member of Rishi Sunak’s deregulated SEZs and Freeports consortia, he said: “I strongly welcome Elanco’s decision to ensure the TriRx site remains open and that jobs are secured. See the problem there

?

https://bionow.co.uk/news/b673dd53b06e6a/hundreds-of-jobs-saved-as-trirx-speke-bought-by-elanco-animal-health#:~:text=A%20%C2%A320m%25https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/122185/

These neoliberal free zones must be dismantled as they contravene EU laws and regulations on giving State Aid (public money) to companies of the previous Govt’s choosing, as I said earlier Rotheram and Burnham were board members of Sunak’s SEZs consortia.

.We have to consider who is set to most gain from the Liverpool SEZ and Freeport, namely PEEL Group Ltd who are a notoriously monopolistic company with a controversial history.

John Whittaker (born 14 March 1942) is a British billionaire. He is chairman of the Peel Group, a property business that mainly invests in North West England. Although publicity-shy, he is one of the most influential business leaders for Greater Manchester and the North West and was named the most influential northerner by The Big Issue magazine in 2010.

Whittaker convinced the BBC to reject three sites across Manchester to move to MediaCityUK in Salford Quays. The presence of the BBC would then act as a magnet to attract indie production companies to Salford and the Peel Group would make money from the rent and lease agreements on the development.

In 2012 The World Heritage Committee decided to delete the property “Liverpool – Maritime Mercantile City” from the World Heritage List, due to the irreversible loss of attributes conveying the outstanding universal value of the property

 

 

The World Heritage Centre and the Advisory Bodies had previously recommended to the World Heritage Committee to express serious concerns about the proposed development of Liverpool Waters and the fact that Liverpool City Council is inclined to grant consent to the proposals submitted by Peel Holdings, in spite of the objections that have been expressed by English Heritage.

There is a great danger that PEEL Group Ltd will enjoy further excessive corporate influence over councils and public services boosted by SEZ status. This on top of having a track record of controversial issues, including environmental pollution, fracking collusions with the council, and the police to gather intelligence on anti-fracking protests, excessive influence on affairs and development in the Liverpool region, claiming Peel “blurred the boundaries between public and private interests”, tax evasion, illegally extracting peat from its land near Salford, greenhouse gas emissions, lack of environmental assessments. In 2014, Peel’s Clydeport business pleaded guilty to health and safety breaches and was fined £650,000 following a triple fatality.

Peel have been described as one of the ‘secretive’ companies that “hoards England’s land” and has made significant impacts, good and bad, on the environment and people’s lives:

Peel Holdings operates behind the scenes, quietly acquiring land and real estate, cutting billion-pound deals and influencing numerous planning decisions. Its investment decisions have had an enormous impact, whether for good or ill, on the places where millions of people live and work.

So if PEEL Group’s atrocious track record of corporate crimes is anything to go by, imagine how much worse they will become inside a deregulated free zone.


This article (Liverpool SEZ/Freeport signed off by Labour’s Mayor Steve Rotheram is a mess of private equity buyouts and glossy brochure failures.) was created and published by EuropeanPowell and is republished here under “Fair Use”

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*