COP29 Extravaganza seems to be ending on sour note: the expected promise of $1 trillion plus/year to poor countries evaporated
UN’s Climate Conference did come up with $30 billion promised for climate agriculture, but are bug factories really the answer?
MERYL NASS
The COP29 meeting was to have ended at 6 pm in Baku, Azerbaijan today, but the nations could not come to an agreement on how much money would be promised to the low and middle income countries (LMIC), so the meeting is continuing into the night. It is already after 1 am on the 23d in Baku.
LMIC demands seem to have ranged from 1 to 5 Trillion dollars per year, with many settling on $1.3 Trillion per year as the “right” number. Today the richer nations proposed giving $250 billion (in some combo of loans and grants) by 2035. Who knows what $250 billion will be worth then, at the rate inflation has been going? So far, no deal.
The thing is, no one knows how much it would cost to prepare for and mitigate climate-associated damage. Nor do they know what the money would be spent on. That makes it difficult to come up with an amount. Though that does not seem to have stopped the negotiators.
According to Aljazeera,
There was also no guarantee that the money, which is expected to be raised by both governments and the private sector, would flow through grants. That could mean more loans that accrue debt for developing countries.
Here is an interesting take from the Guardian:
The $100 billion figure was “plucked out of the air,” said Rachel Kyte, the UK’s new climate envoy, speaking before her appointment to the role. The offer was made – largely at the instigation of the then US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton – based on political calculations of what developed country governments thought their electorates would stand for.
A little money was promised for the effects of climate change on agriculture, amounting to about $10 billion dollars per year.
Even though the international “experts” claim that agriculture contributes to 33% of global warming emissions, with livestock alone contributing nearly half of that, agriculture only got a pittance. But if agriculture causes a third of global warming, shouldn’t it receive a third of the promised climate funding? $10 Billion/yr is less than 1% of $1.3 trillion, and is 4% of $250 billion/yr.
Where do you think that $30 billion is going? Some of it is going to a massive expansion of insect farms, mostly growing mealworms and crickets.
Yes, every yellow or green circle in the 2023 article above represents an edible insect producer. But because the powers that be have not yet convinced us to eat ze bugs, most of their production today goes into food for animals. But there is still plenty for humans. Here are some of the products:
Our generous governments have been throwing money at these companies over the past several years. But maybe the bug food producers and their investors are starting to see the light, realizing that the world is taking a new tack. (H/T to Dr. William Makis for this article:)
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/trudeau-9-million-bet-on-edible-crickets-runs-into-trouble
Just two years after the Trudeau government put up nearly $9 million to help build the world’s largest edible cricket factory, the facility is dramatically cutting staff and production in what they say is an extended retooling.
Aspire Food Group, which cut the ribbon last year on a 150,000-square-foot edible cricket factory in London, Ont., has just laid off two thirds of its workforce and significantly cut back shifts, saying they need to make “some improvements to its manufacturing system.”
Speaking to the trade publication AgFunderNews, Aspire CEO David Rosenberg said the company “will be running the production line four times a week instead of two shifts a day every day. We’re 150 people down to 50 and we plan on hiring back up in July.”
This is despite very generous grants from the Trudeau government. In June 2022, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada announced a grant of “up to $8.5 million” to build a “commercial facility to produce cricket protein.”
What resulted was a factory billed by Aspire as the “world’s largest cricket production facility.” As per a CBC profile published at its grand opening, the factory was to house four billion crickets at any one time, and churn out 13 million kilograms of edible crickets each year.
Aspire’s signature pitch – and one of the main reasons they attracted federal government attention – is that crickets have a lower environmental footprint than meat or dairy.
The 2022 Government of Canada statement announcing the $8.5 million grant mentioned this several times. The subsidy would help Aspire produce “high volumes of nutritious food with a low environmental footprint” and “meet global demand for food by using less water, energy and space and emitting significantly less greenhouse gas emissions.”
“Aspire will be at home here as the company re-defines what is possible in the insect protein sector, creating new solutions for sustainable food production,” Liberal MP Arielle Kayabaga said in the statement.
In September 2022, Aspire announced an agreement with the Korean food distributor Lotte Confectionary Co. Ltd. – pitching it as their first deal to sell cricket powder for human consumption. However, the deal was only a memorandum of understanding to “formalize their cooperation in the distribution and promotion of crickets as food.”
According to the AgFunderNews story announcing mass layoffs and production slowdowns, the facility was still mainly selling its crickets to pet food manufacturers as of March 2023.
AgFunderNews also noted that – just a year prior – Aspire had been saying that they would be at 100 per cent capacity by early 2024, and likely had enough orders to handle all the production. “We have significant contractual commitments for the majority of our production and expect 100% will be sold within the year,” then-CEO Mohammed Ashour had told AgFunderNews in March 2023.
Founded by five McGill University students, Aspire grew out of a proposal that in 2013 won the $1 million Hult Prize, an award for student entrepreneurship run by the Clinton Global Initiative.
The team, led by Ontario man Ashour, had pitched Hult on a plan to solve world hunger through factories producing cheap protein made from insects. The initial idea was to have miniature cricket farms contained within shipping containers that could be moved into developing countries to produce protein-rich flour.
Trump’s election may be saving us from eating ze bugs, as well as nuclear war. (It is said the chief of NATO, the Netherland’s (and Globalists’) Mark Rutte, is meeting with Trump at Mar a Lago right now). This is when we need someone who knows how to make a deal.
This article (COP29 Extravaganza seems to be ending on sour note: the expected promise of $1 trillion plus/year to poor countries evaporated) was created and published by Meryl’s CHAOS Newsletter and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply