PAUL HOMEWOOD
h/t idau
Miliband spaffs yet more taxpayer money down the drain:
From MSN:
Ed Miliband has been forced to set aside £8 billion to cover the risk of a carbon capture disaster as the costs of net zero stack up.
The Energy Secretary’s department has taken the charge to compensate companies in case the technology fails. It will in effect act as an insurance policy for risks ranging from CO2 leaks to simply not making enough money.
The £8 billion is thought to be in addition to the £22 billion of funding and subsidies already pledged by the Government to support the nascent industry.
Details were buried in Rachel Reeves’s Spring Statement, which listed the colossal sums simply as “contingent liabilities” without giving any explanation.
Contingent liabilities is the term for money set aside to cover unpredictable future events with potentially disastrous costs.
The Treasury has since confirmed that the money is specifically to support companies involved in building the carbon capture and storage industry.
Executives have told ministers that although the technology could open the way to a net zero future, it is also fraught with potentially expensive risks.
Carbon capture involves stripping CO2 from the emissions produced by industries like power stations, cement factories and refineries. The CO2 would then be compressed into a liquid and transported via a network of pipelines, eventually being buried deep in the rocks beneath the seabed.
However, the industry fears CO2 could leak from the pipelines or from underground storage sites. Such an escape on land could be not only disastrously expensive but also dangerous. Plugging a leak in a repository deep under the sea would meanwhile be both difficult and expensive.
Sarah Jones, a junior energy minister, previously announced plans to indemnify the industry in the Commons but without giving costs.
She said: “Carbon capture usage and storage is the only feasible method for decarbonising many hard-to-abate sectors such as cement production, and is currently the most cost-effective method of decarbonising others, such as dispatchable power.
“While there is growing interest worldwide, a programme of this nature is first of a kind and consequently there are multiple market barriers which inhibit the development of a carbon capture usage and storage market in the UK.
“Government support is necessary to address these challenges and enable carbon capture usage and storage deployment at scale.
“The Government is reducing investor risk in these technologies by bearing some of the initial risk inherent in developing a carbon capture usage and storage market, as well as the cross-chain risk existing across the participants in the network.”
Mr Miliband launched the UK’s first so-called carbon capture clusters last autumn with funding for two initial sites in Teesside and Merseyside and more to follow. The Energy Secretary predicted then that the industry would eventually generate 50,000 jobs by the 2030s.
In simple terms, DESNZ is not only paying subsidies to cover the cost of carbon capture to companies like BP, they are also providing insurance to pick up the bill if things go wrong.
For BP, it is a win-win. For taxpayers, it is a lose-lose.
Am I the only one to think that Ed Miliband believes he has a God given right to spend our money however he sees fit?
FOOTNOTE
I don’t know whether DESNZ are naive or utterly mendacious:
“A spokesperson for the Department of Energy Security and Net Zero said it was “misleading” to argue that household bills would increase by £255 a year because the costs were also borne by businesses.”
What do they think businesses will do when hit with these extra costs? They will either put up prices, cut wages or slash jobs. Whichever, it is the public who will end up paying one way or another, just as we will be with Rachel from Accounts’ jobs tax.
SOURCE: Not a Lot of People Know That
Featured image: x.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply