As if all the other damage done by the Covid shots were not bad enough, now add the 30,000+ women in the UK alone who report menstrual problems after COVID jabs.
“If we were to follow the scientific method, as it was taught in textbooks . . . we would immediately see this observation of menstrual cycle changes in tens of thousands of women as a signal, for which necessary questions would need to be asked,” Dr. Lawrence Palevsky.
An editorial published on Sept. 16th in The BMJ, tells us that as of 2nd September more than 30,000 reports of menstrual irregularities and vaginal bleeding had been made to the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency’s (MHRA) Yellow Card Scheme.
Such reports include heavier-than-usual periods, delayed periods and unexpected vaginal bleeding, yet despite these alarming numbers, none of the COVID vaccine manufacturers list any issues pertinent to menstrual health as a side effect.
We should also bear in mind that whilst this 30 000 may be disingenuously dismissed by the vaccine cult advocates as a “small percentage” of the overall number of vaccines administered, when we factor out those who do not menstruate in any case (men, post menopausal women etc) it is a much higher percentage than at first appears.
To illustrate the point with crude made-up figures, if, say, 20 million people have been vaxed, the 30,000 does indeed make up a small percentage, yet small percentage or not it is still a large number of women who are reporting problems, far far higher than with any other vaccine or medication that this writer knows of. And it is certainly a high enough number to prompt an investigation on the part of any public body that gives a damn.
But of that 20 million roughly half are men who are never going to menstruate so in truth it is 30,000 out of 10 million women. Of that 10 million women a very high percentage of those vaccinated are old and post-menopausal, so again there’s no menstrual cycle to disrupt. A big guess on my part but if we assume at least half the women vaxed are in that older group, we now have 30,000 out of 5 million, roughly four time the percentage the raw figures suggest.
But we must consider this too in the context of the flawed reporting system itself (see below) and that menstrual anomalies comprise is just one of a considerable range and number of adverse reactions.
The Covid vaccines have prompted more dissent, organised opposition and warnings of disaster from more people with relevant expertise such as researchers, doctors, nurses, immunologists, virologists than any other medication in history.
This is in the context of extraordinarily high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths that would normally see a medication pulled long before the numbers got anywhere near this bad.
Many see this lack of due diligence by the government and its health agencies as having already cost thousands of lives and being set to cost thousands more if it does not adopt a more responsible attitude very quickly.
Various experts, professional groups, legal groups and concerned citizens are calling for the obvious to be done in the face of such clear warning signs that all is not well with the experimental pseudo vaccines, namely an urgent investigation into potential effects of COVID vaccines on menstrual health.
Dr Victoria Male, a reproductive specialist at Imperial College in London has revealed that:
“Menstrual changes have been reported after both mRNA and adenovirus vectored COVID-19 vaccines, suggesting that if there is a connection, it is likely to be a result of the immune response to vaccination rather than a specific vaccine component.”
She also revealed that the way in which Yellow Card data are collected makes firm conclusions difficult.
Meanwhile further alarm has been raised by the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which tells us that between Dec. 14, 2020 and Sept. 10, 2021, there have been 8,793 total reports of menstrual disorders after vaccination with a COVID vaccine.
But the situation may be far worse than it at first appears because historically, VAERS has been shown to report only 1% of actual vaccine adverse events, which means the number of actual adverse events involving menstrual disorders could be much higher.
To further fuel concerns, a recent whistleblower report has revealed that with the current vaccines, reporting adverse reactions to VAERS may be being actively discouraged by the medical establishment so it appears the current percentage maybe even lower than the historically low 1%.
In Medical News Today, Dr. Sarah Gray (a GP who for 15 years ran a specialist women’s health clinic for the UK’s National Health Service) said:
“The control of menstrual bleeding is complex with potential effects from the brain, ovaries and uterus itself. It is plausible that the effects of [SARS-CoV-2] infection or vaccination on the immune system could affect this control pathway, and any research would be greatly valued.”
She also noted, “women’s health has not been a research priority for 20 years and there is much we do not know.”
In the US, Dr. Kathryn Clancy, assistant professor at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, involved in similar research into acute immune activation and menstrual repair mechanisms said that.
Palevsky said and further explained that.
“There is a long list of side effects that the manufacturers of the injection sent to the FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] in the fall of 2020. Many of the injuries people are reporting after receiving these injections, including bleeding, blood clots, autoimmunity, Guillain-Barré syndrome and many others, are well known to the manufacturers and the FDA but, the powers that be continue to ignore the reports of people presenting with these real-time adverse events, as if they have nothing to do with the injections, at all.
“Essentially, they gathered the data in clinical trials but have kept them completely under wraps.”
He, among others, believes the spike protein could play a role in the menstrual irregularities women are reporting, along with, “other factors we may not know because no one is doing the appropriate research.”
Meanwhile, concerns have become widespread over the steadfast refusal by government to exercise due diligence and investigate or even acknowledge the soaring numbers of deaths and adverse reactions occurring in the short term immediately after vaccination, with the medium and long term numbers yet to be seen.
With the experimental vaccines accruing in a few months many many times the deaths and adverse reactions of all other vaccines combined in history, the clamour of alarm bells has become too loud and too insistent for a sane and diligent government to ignore.
Many see the current government’s contrived deafness as a clear sign that behind the ruthless and relentless vaccine push there lies a more sinister agenda.
If this were not so, the following common sense measures would long since have been done: a suspension of the vaccine roll out whilst a full, impartial, thorough and unbiased investigation is carried out.
The argument that the recklessness of the rollout is a “necessary risk” in order to “save lives” no longer holds water as it has emerged that:
* The vaccines are taking twice as many lives as they are allegedly saving.
* Much safer and far more highly workable remedies for Covid 19 have existed from the outset that render even less fatal an alleged bug that even when untreated has a fatality rate on a par with flu.
* The groups being targeted for the jabs are not at risk
* The variants are becoming progressively milder, and in such follow the normal pattern of epidemics, with the Delta the mildest yet.
Leave a Reply