As the UK COVID19 alleged death toll reaches 42 times that of Japan, the UK government has some explaining to do

Is the government listening to the wrong scientists? If so, why?

Is the government listening to the wrong scientists? If so, why?
by Jon Davy
Perhaps the government could explain something:
Japan with no lockdown has 869 COVID19 deaths, while the UK has, allegedly, about 38,000!!!
In other words, the UK has FORTY TWO times the number of deaths that Japan has.
But it only has HALF Japan’s population so if you factor that in, the UK’s stats are about 84 times worse than Japan’s.
Factor in also that Japan has an older population than the UK – in fact it has the oldest population on the planet.
The PM is fond of telling us that the UK’s response to COVID19 is driven by “science”.  Well WHAT freakin’ science is that exactly? And which scientists? Dr Strangelove?
Clearly the UK government is listening to the wrong scientists and the fact that it persists in so doing despite the glaring evidence that it shouldn’t tells us that it is listening to the “experts” it WANTS to listen to because their advice suits and justifies some agenda other than “saving lives”.
Alternatively, the UK government has been grossly falsifying the death stars to justify the catastrophic lockdown and this has now smacked it in its lying teeth as the comparison between its stats and Japan’s suggests an utterly risible level of incompetence that is off the charts.
These last points are conjecture of course because we do not know who exactly is saying what to our government. Secrecy excludes us from these communications so that we cannot see them, understand them or evaluate them, whilst based upon then are government edicts that ruin the economy and disrupt countless lives as well as, arguably, killing more people than than those allegedly killed by the virus.
And based upon that “scientific” input is a handling of the so-called epidemic that is so inferior to that of Japan it beggars belief.
So the next time BJ gives us the vague generality that the government is being guided by science, our response should be:
“Well, WHAT science. specifically?  Give us the full details. We want to SEE it.”


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 2254 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.