Arla’s Project Adding Anti-Methane Compound to Cows’ Feed Is Another Limb of the Fake Food Agenda

Arla’s project adding anti-methane compound to cows’ feed is another limb of the fake food agenda

RHODA WILSON

Arla has enlisted 30 farms to participate in trials of an additive to cattle feed that they claim will reduce methane gas emissions.  As the safety of the product is as questionable as the dubious reasons for introducing it and the risk to humans is unknown there has quite rightly been a public backlash.

Aside from the health and environmental risks, as Dr. Lawrie highlights, this is just another instance of billionaires meddling with our food supplies. This should raise red flags for anyone who understands what, for example, Bill Gates’ aims are.

As part of its FarmAhead Customer Partnership initiative, Arla has joined forces with Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi to trial the use of Bovaer, a feed additive that reduces enteric methane emissions from cows on average by 27%.  The project will also involve around 30 of Arla’s farmer owners.

As reported by The Grocer, the retailers made a joint statement on the trial and said it gave “the ability to address some of the climate challenges facing our food system.”  However, Arla’s announcement has sparked a backlash from the public with some saying they will no longer shop at Morrisons, Tesco and Aldi.

Bill Gates has an unhealthy obsession with cows producing methane gas.  His obsession is, of course, driven by how much money he can make out of his pandemic and climate scams.  However, Newsweek reported that Bill Gates has not invested in Bovaer, he has invested in a similar bovine animal feed additive through Rumin8. Bovaer is a product developed by the Dutch company DSM-Firmenich.

Whether it is Gates, another oligarch or a large corporation attempting to corner the market and control the food supply through vaccines or feeds, the facts remain the same.  There is nothing wrong with cows producing methane.  On the contrary, as we noted in an article last year, methane from cattle is part of nature’s biogenic carbon cycle.  Plants capture carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere, absorbing the carbon and releasing the oxygen, the carbon is converted into carbohydrates and consumed by the cow where it is digested and some of the carbon is belched from the cow as methane. After an average of 10 years, the methane is converted into CO2 and so the cycle continues.

In the video below, the lie that cows are killing the climate is debunked in 3 minutes.

Bovaer contains silicon dioxide, propylene glycol and 3-nitrooxypropanol (“3-NOP”). A report from the Food Standards Agency last year highlighted concerns about 3-NOP, stating that it “should be considered corrosive to the eyes, a skin irritant, and potentially harmful by inhalation” for humans handling the substance.

3-NOP may have adverse effects on the reproductive system, including decreased sperm counts and changes in testicular and epididymal weights. It may also alter rumen microbial communities as it changes the abundance of certain archaeal and bacterial genera.

We have previously published an article on how altering the rumen microbiome has serious implications for the cow’s health and well-being.  Please read our article HERE.

In addition to health problems from poor digestion, in a carcinogenicity study in rats, benign mesenchymal tumours were observed in the duodenum and jejunum.  In a subacute toxicity study, a decrease in sperm counts and a decrease in the motor activity of sperm was observed in males as well as a decrease in the absolute and relative weights of male testis and epididymis.

Read more: Outcome of assessment of 3-Nitrooxypropanol “3-NOP” – Assessment, Food Standard Agency, Gov.uk

Even though marketers may claim it is “safe and effective,” the risks to humans who ingest Bovaer-fed livestock products are unknown.  If you want to avoid drinking milk or eating meat from Bovaer-fed cattle, a website called ‘Bovaer Free Farms’ has been started where farms are self-declaring themselves to be Bovaer-free. You can access the list of farms HERE

*****

Fake Food, Bill Gates’ Involvement in Animal-Free Milk and the Bigger Agenda

By Dr. Tess Lawrie

The food industry is undergoing major meddling by billionaires and multi-national corporations and our food is changing. World Council for Health (“WCH”) recently wrote about Bovaer additives in animal feed. Well, there are also companies like Remilk leading the charge towards “animal-free” alternatives to traditional dairy. While these innovations are framed as breakthroughs in ethical consumption, this growing “fake food” trend has dangerous implications for both health and sovereignty.

With Bovaer designed to reduce cow farts by messing with their digestive system, Remilk, an Israeli startup, boasts that it can create dairy proteins without cows through a process that uses fermentation to produce proteins identical to those found in milk. Worryingly, this fake milk company has recently appointed executives from corporate monsters like Danone, PepsiCo, and Nestlé, to its board of directors.

This year, Canadian regulators gave Remilk the green light to market and sell their lab-grown, artificial “milk” product in Canada. There are troubling long-term implications of this “fake food” trend – especially considering the involvement of Bill Gates with his views on depopulation. Gates is a key investor in Remilk through his Breakthrough Energy Ventures fund. Thus, the deeper question remains: What is the true agenda behind this rapidly growing sector?

Gates’ investment in Remilk is not just a passive financial stake; it is part of a broader ideological commitment to using technology to reshape the world, including food systems. Through Breakthrough Energy Ventures, Gates has backed several companies focused on food tech, many of which advocate for lab-grown, synthetic foods. While proponents use “greenhouse gas” reduction as their argument in favour of these unnatural technologies, they may well serve a more insidious purpose – undermining traditional agriculture and facilitating the centralisation of food production under corporate control.

The involvement of Gates, whose “philanthropic” ventures serve his population control agenda as well as his bank balance, raises serious red flags. Gates openly advocates for the use of “innovative” technologies to manage global population growth. The push for synthetic, lab-grown food serves to further his ideological objectives – by consolidating power in the hands of a few, controlling what people eat, and pushing us toward a future dominated by genetically engineered foods and alternative proteins.

Moreover, Gates’ backing of the fake food industry ties into broader concerns about transhumanism, the belief in using advanced technology to change human beings to “transcend” natural characteristics. Through genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”) and bioengineering, the push to alter human genetics is being orchestrated not only through food but in the guise of “vaccines” and other drugs.

The long-term effects of consuming synthetic proteins are largely unknown.

Marketed as environmentally friendly and animal cruelty-free, the health risks associated with eating these lab-grown products foods are not well understood, and the potential for unforeseen consequences – whether in human digestion, long-term health, or the biodiversity of our food systems – is high.

On the surface, these innovations may appear to offer solutions to social and environmental challenges. However, beneath the surface, they represent a dangerous convergence of corporate interests, technological control, and ideological agendas. As this trend accelerates, it is essential that we critically examine who is driving these changes, and why. Overcoming indifference is key. It is time to get active and withdraw our support of multinational corporations; it is time to support local food producers.

About the Author

Tess Lawrie is a medical doctor and has a Doctorate in Philosophy.  She has practised clinical medicine in both the United Kingdom and South Africa but now only performs non-clinical research.

She is the Director of E-BMC Ltd and founding Director of EbMCsquared CiC, a community interest research company. She is also the founder of the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development International (“BiRD International”) and a member of the steering group of the World Council for Health.

Dr. Lawrie publishes articles and podcasts on a Substack page titled ‘A Better Way with Dr Tess Lawrie’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.

SOURCE

*****

More Crap in Our Milk

WATCH:

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*