The Prime Minister Says He Gets It and Is Angry. Not Nearly As Angry as We Are Sir Keir

The Prime Minister says he gets it and is angry. Not nearly as angry as we are Sir Keir!

MIGRATION WATCH UK

What does uncontrolled mass immigration really mean for the future the UK?

This week it’s been mostly about illegal immigration and asylum, with the Prime Minister doing his best to convince us that he “gets it” and that we are “right to be angry about illegal immigration”. Take a look at his article in the Daily Mail on Monday. The following day, our Chairman, Alp Mehmet, responded with a comment piece also in the Daily Mail. You can click here to read that too.

On Monday, some forty ministers and officials from around the world met in London for yet another “landmark conference”. A communiqué was issued setting out how participants will deepen their collaboration internationally “to tackle this vile crime”. Now, how decisive is that! There was no mention of “illegal immigration,” to quote the Prime Minister. It was all about dealing with “Organised Immigration Crime” (OIC). We genuinely struggled to see the point of the conference. The final three paragraphs of the Home Office press release illustrated the vacuity of the conference and why we just don’t believe Sir Keir and his Home secretary are serious about tackling illegal immigration. See what you think:

“The Home Secretary also announced joint work with France to fund an additional grassroots engagement programme to educate local communities on the dangers of irregular migration and people smuggling gangs, raising awareness of the realities and difficulties with travelling to Northern France to cross the Channel to the UK.

This will target both potential irregular migrants and, for the first time, teachers, religious leaders, and family members within vulnerable communities, and builds on the Home Office digital deterrence comms campaign that is already running in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.

The UK will also collaborate with France to deliver critical training to Iraqi officials and commercial transport staff, helping them detect fraudulent documents and passports used to facilitate irregular migration and OIC activities.”

If that’s not cringeworthy, what is?

There was another headline on Tuesday that had us gasping in disbelief:

“Asylum system risks ‘damaging social cohesion’, Glasgow city council warns.” Council says cost running into tens of millions, as homeless refugees granted asylum across UK come to city for support.

It prompted a sharp intake of breath at Migration Watch HQ. No, this wasn’t the Daily Mail or TelegraphExpress or The Sun reporting. Believe it or not, it was The Guardian. Really. Take a look.

You may recall another headline, also in The Guardian, in May 2021, Glasgow protesters rejoice as men freed after immigration van standoff.”

The incident happened in Nicola Sturgeon’s (remember her?) constituency. After the release of the two Sikhs who were to be returned to India (and eventually were), Ms Sturgeon tweeted, “I am proud to represent a constituency and lead a country that welcomes and shows support to asylum seekers and refugees.”  Be careful what you wish for, Nicola…

Legal migration

15-20 years ago, we at Migration Watch paid much less attention to asylum because in the general scheme of things, the number of asylum applicants was relatively small – around 8-10,000 a year. However, in 2024 the number rose to around 110,000, higher than it has ever been (Channel crossers constituted around a third.) The previous peak was 100,000 in the early 2000s in the aftermath of the wars following the break-up of Yugoslavia. Asylum is still only a fraction of the overall net migration figure and forms an even smaller part of the total foreign inflow.

While it cannot be dismissed given the inherent risks and ultimate costs of taking in tens of thousands of mostly young men, the massive overall inflows still pose the much greater risks. Our governments cannot go on ignoring the increasing pace of demographic change and the rapidly approaching point when the native white British are a minority in the country of their forebears. We appreciate that this something we now write about every week but it is so critically important that we simply must.

Just to underline the importance of this, here’s an extract from last week’s newsletter commenting on Rhodes Napier’s remarkable article in the Pimlico Journal: 

“The first and foremost question Britain will face in the twenty-first century is not related to state capacity, land-use planning, or foreign policy, as important as all these things may be. It is whether — as demographer David Coleman [projected] in [2010] — we will be a country in which only a minority of the population are white British (Migration Watch comment: i.e. native British, – English, Scottish, Welsh, Irish) by the latter decades of this century. By comparison, all other questions fade into insignificance.”

If an opportunity arises, do pass this on.

X Posts (formerly “Tweets”) of the week

John Cleese in trouble for stating the bl…ing obvious when he said, “London is no longer an English city.” What do you think? Watch here.

This remarkable interview posted by the fizzing Darren Grimes, who has moved on from GBNews to do his own thing, is quite something.

MWUK in the media

Will Sir Keir Starmer smash the gangs? Not a hope. Alp writing in the Daily Mail, click here to read the article.

“No, Sir Keir Starmer is not going to smash the gangs.” Alp interviewed by Martin Daubney on GBNews. Watch here.

Alp quoted in the European Conservative in a report by our friend Michael Curzon “Britain Has Given Up Trying to Solve Illegal Migration”.

“The Government must shake off its complacency, tackle legal and illegal inflows, stop importing cheaper workers, and prioritise the future of our own young people. Nothing they have done or said so far will achieve this.” Read the article here.

GBNews writing about our criticism of the government’s performance. Read the article here.

It’s not often we get quoted in EU Today“King Canute Starmer Hosts Global Summit asSmall Boat Crisis Escalates”Read the article here.

Our articles of the week

A must-read. The brilliant Sam Bidwell writing in The Critic: “How the Muslim vote is reshaping British politics— Muslim voters in Britain do not need the traditional parties any more.” Read the article here.

We liked this too, also by Sam Bidwell.

And an interesting report by Charles Hymas in The Telegraph about asylum applications. Read here.

What can you do?

As ever, we ask you to write to your MP.

Tell him/her how you feel about your country disappearing before your very eyes. If the Muslim woman speaking in the clip Darren Grimes posted on X can say the country is being changed by recent arrivals into what they escaped from, why can’t native British people say the same thing without being castigated and labelled as racist?

One of our older supporters, a widower in his 80s, wrote recently to say he lived in the house he and his late wife had lived in throughout their married life. He is now afraid to go out because he feels threatened and out of place when he does, a stranger in his lifelong neighbourhood. How sad is that?

TAKE ACTION NOW

☑️ Write to your MP NOW

☑️ Forward this newsletter to a friend

☑️ Make a donation NOW


SOURCE: Migration Watch UK Newsletter 

Featured image: YouTube 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*