Why Dartmoor’s ponies forced Keir Starmer to turn on Natural England
The Prime Minister has been dragged into an emotive row at one of the worst times possible, but no one seems prepared to take responsibility
LEAF ARBUTHNOT, RUBY CLINE, PATRICK GALBRAITH, CAMERON HENDERSON
[Dartmoor ponies] are at the centre of an increasingly bitter row that has seen the beleaguered Prime Minister labelled “Keir Starmer, Pony Harmer”, leading to calls for the quango Natural England to be “culled” and the forging of an unlikely alliance between the Conservatives, Reform and the Liberal Democrats.
The row erupted when it emerged that Natural England, a body charged with advising the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), had proposed new grazing rules in the name of biodiversity that could lead, campaigners argue, to up to 93 per cent of Dartmoor’s semi-wild ponies being shot.
The ponies – which are stewarded by an increasingly small group of farmers known as “commoners” – have roamed Dartmoor since the Bronze Age. They have dwindled in number over recent decades, but slightly fewer than 1,000 still remain.
The endangered creatures have long enjoyed an exemption from environmental schemes designed to cap the amount of livestock allowed to graze the moorland. Now, however, Natural England has decided to lump them in with sheep and cattle for the first time. The quango is recommending that all livestock grazing the moor be reduced in number by around 75 per cent, to protect other habitats, plants and species.
The plan chimes with fears that there is a broader rewilding agenda afoot that seeks to overhaul Dartmoor as it is today and might eventually do away with the farmers entirely. The moor, Natural England points out, is in poor condition; the hope seems to be that if grazing – even by the widely beloved ponies – is reduced, the habitat will be allowed to regenerate.
But critics clearly do not believe a cull of the ponies is any sort of solution. Indeed, news of the plans saw serried ranks of opponents form almost at once – from interest groups sticking up for the animals, to farmers, politicians and vocal activists on social media. Including the creatures in the grazing restrictions, they argued, would force farmers to make a terrible choice between preserving the lives of their cattle and sheep, or the lives of the ponies that they also manage. Presented with such a choice, many farmers are expected to choose their own livestock, as they can be sold for meat. A pony cull, were one to happen, would probably occur in September, at the yearly “drift” – a centuries-old tradition used to manage herd sizes, conduct health checks and sell ponies at market.
In any case, even if farmers were to decide to save the ponies in their care over their cattle and sheep, such a choice would likely lead to farmers no longer making enough money to survive – and therefore being unable to steward the ponies as they currently do. So, critics of the proposals argue, in either situation, the animals’ long-term future on the moor looks perilous indeed.
This rather technical disagreement burst into the public arena this week, when the leader of the opposition, Kemi Badenoch, described Natural England’s proposals as “total madness”, saying: “Keir Starmer is on his way to making his last acts in office the shameful underfunding of our military and the mass slaughter of Dartmoor ponies.”
Nigel Farage similarly dismissed the plans as “absolute madness”, accusing Natural England of “environmental vandalism”, whilst Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey insisted that the precious ponies were not “the problem on the moor, they’re part of the solution by helping to graze back the invasive species that are choking out everything else”.
On social media, meanwhile, there were impassioned cries to “stop the cull” and much hand-wringing about whether an “equine genocide” might be around the corner. One commentator on X imagined the conversation that might be playing out in Downing Street, with Starmer musing: “How can we make ourselves even more unpopular?” and an aide replying: “Well, Prime Minister, we could allow Natural England to proceed with their plan to shoot 90 per cent of the ponies on Dartmoor.” “Yes, that might do it,” Starmer replies.
The Telegraph: continue reading
See Related Article Below
Death On Dartmoor
The Net Zero Pony Cull
JESSICA CARLILE
In the windswept wilds of Dartmoor, where Britain’s iconic semi-wild ponies have roamed for centuries, a grotesque act of bureaucratic barbarism is unfolding. The Labour government, under the zealotry of Ed Miliband and his fanatical net zero cult, is poised to preside over the near-extinction of these beloved creatures. Up to 90% of Dartmoor’s hill ponies, symbols of our rural heritage, ecological guardians, and living emblems of English resilience, face culling, not for some noble cause, but to satisfy the insatiable, evidence-free demands of an ideological crusade. This is not conservation; it is vandalism dressed in green rhetoric. It is sinister, stupid, and a damning indictment of a government that would rather butcher innocent animals than admit its net zero fantasies are unravelling.
Picture the scene: hardy Dartmoor ponies, descendants of beasts that have grazed these moors since the Bronze Age, navigating the rugged terrain with a grace born of centuries of adaptation. Numbering now under 1,000 after decades of decline, they are no plague upon the land. On the contrary, the 2024 Fursdon review praised them as invaluable for conservation, their grazing maintaining the delicate balance of moorland biodiversity by controlling tough grasses that would otherwise choke rarer habitats. Yet Natural England, that unaccountable quango of net zero zealots, has decreed drastic reductions in livestock numbers under new Countryside Stewardship schemes. Ponies are now lumped in with sheep and cattle, forcing farmers into impossible choices: prioritise profitable livestock or watch their herds, and the ponies, dwindle to nothing. The result? A de facto cull, with ponies rounded up in traditional “drifts” unlikely to return to the moor.
Why? To “save biodiversity,” they bleat, as if these ponies were not integral to it. But scratch the surface, and the true motive emerges: propping up Ed Miliband’s disastrous net zero agenda. Miliband, the Energy Secretary whose every pronouncement drips with messianic fervour for windmills, solar farms, and punitive carbon targets, demands ever more land sacrificed at the altar of emissions targets. Reducing grazing aligns with broader pushes to rewild vast swathes of countryside, turning productive moors into carbon sinks or “rainforests” to offset the failures of his renewable fantasies. Never mind that Britain’s actual contribution to global emissions is minuscule, or that net zero policies are driving up energy bills, hollowing out industry, and achieving precisely nothing for the climate while China builds coal plants by the dozen. The ponies must die so Miliband can claim another illusory victory on his spreadsheets.
This plan is as idiotic as it is cruel. Dartmoor ponies are not overgrazing pests; they are a rare breed on the watchlist, genetically vital and culturally priceless. Farmers and commoners have stewarded the moor for generations, their traditional practices far wiser than the desk-bound diktats from Whitehall. Yet Natural England is demanding reductions of 56-89% in total livestock, treating these animals as interchangeable units in a bureaucratic ledger. Critics warn of 67-92% pony losses as farmers favour economically viable stock. Downing Street and Defra may issue mealy-mouthed denials of an “official cull,” but the outcome is the same: ponies shot or removed, their carcasses a monument to governmental hubris. How sinister that a Labour administration, quick to lecture on compassion and the environment, would engineer the demise of these gentle creatures to mask policy failure.
The stupidity runs deeper. This is the same government that lectures us on “climate emergency” while its net zero obsessions cripple the economy. Miliband’s carbon budgets demand eye-watering cuts – 87% by 2040 – predicated on unproven technologies, mass electrification, and land-use changes that prioritise abstract targets over reality. Ponies grazing moorland? Too carbon-intensive, apparently, in the deranged calculus of zealots who ignore that rewilding here does little for global temperatures but devastates rural communities. Farmers face subsidy blackmail: comply with eco-rules or starve. The result is cultural erasure; Dartmoor without its ponies is a sterile shadow, robbed of soul to appease urban environmentalists who have never set foot on the moor.
One cannot overstate the sinister undertones. This is not mere incompetence; it smacks of ideological possession. Miliband and his allies view the countryside not as a living heritage but as a canvas for their utopian redesign. Net zero is their secular religion, and dissent, or traditional land use, is heresy. Ponies, like farmers, fishermen, and steelworkers before them, are collateral damage in the great green purge. Recall how net zero has already hiked our energy prices to Europe’s highest, offshored emissions to dirtier nations, and threatened winter blackouts. Now, it comes for our national icons. What next? Culling badgers or deer to “save” some contrived metric? The government’s quangoes operate with impunity, accountable to no one, wielding power to reshape Britain in their image while ordinary folk pay the price.
The public outrage is palpable and justified. Petitions surge, Conservative voices rightly decry the madness, and even some within Labour’s orbit squirm. Lord Redwood called it “net zero madness and cruelty.” Quite. These ponies are not abstract; they are beloved, photographed by tourists, celebrated in literature and lore. Slaughtering them evokes dystopian nightmares, Big Brother deciding which species fits the plan. The government’s defence of “no direct cull” is weasel words, evading responsibility for policies that make culling inevitable. Sinister evasion from a regime that prioritises virtue-signalling over common sense.
Consider the broader folly. Britain’s moors sequester carbon effectively under traditional management. Ponies help prevent scrub encroachment, supporting birds, insects, and flora. Rewilding experiments elsewhere have often backfired, creating monocultures or fire risks. Yet ideology trumps evidence. Miliband’s “clean energy superpower” delusion demands sacrifice: higher bills, fewer jobs, altered landscapes, and now dead ponies. This is eco-tyranny, with the state demanding that your land, your livestock, your heritage must yield to its models. Stupidity compounded by arrogance: assuming central planners know better than generations of Devon folk.
The human cost is dire. Commoners and farmers, already battered by punitive post-Brexit rules, inflation, and green levies, face heartbreak and financial ruin. Families who have tended ponies for lifetimes must choose between livelihood and conscience. Children growing up without Dartmoor’s living symbols will inherit a poorer Britain, sanitised, regulated, joyless. This is cultural vandalism, the erasure of what makes us British: rugged individualism, respect for tradition, love of the land. Miliband’s net zero cannot deliver cheap, reliable energy; instead, it delivers cruelty and division.
Enough. The government must reverse course immediately. Overrule Natural England, or better still abolish it. Exempt ponies from punitive quotas and support traditional grazing. Britain needs pragmatic environmentalism, conserving through use, not against it, not this death cult. Dartmoor ponies represent freedom, endurance, and beauty. Killing them to “save the planet” (or rather, to salvage Miliband’s failing crusade) exposes the net zero project as not just unworkable but malevolent.
In this deranged episode, we see the soul of modern governance: detached, dogmatic, destructive. The ponies of Dartmoor deserve better than to be martyrs for Ed Miliband’s vanity. So do we all. If this government cannot see the madness in slaughtering national treasures for ideological purity, it has forfeited any claim to wisdom or decency. Stop the cull. Scrap the insanity. Let the ponies run free – a rebuke to the sinister stupidity in Westminster.Death on Dartmoor!
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.




