by Steve Cook
It has been fascinating to watch how the master manipulators behind the Coronavirus smoke-and-mirrors psyop have subtly shifted the narrative to get us all arguing among ourselves about whether we should wear a mask.
Arguments or worries as to whether masks are effective in halting the spread of a deadly, highly infectious virus is based upon the acceptance of the premise that there exists a virus as deadly and infectious as we have been told.
Indeed, arguing about the effectiveness of masks tends to bolster or strengthen the idea that there lurks out there somewhere an insidiously invisible threat to your survival.
The switch to arguing about the effectiveness of masks deflects attention away from the fact that, as more data has come in, the virus has proven to be neither as deadly nor infectious as we were propagandised into believing it was. As the whole premise of the coronavirus scare and justification for the ruinous folly of Lockdown begin to unravel before the increasingly cynical eyes of the public, suddenly we are arguing about masks.
If you don’t want people exchanging ideas about or looking too closely at “A”, get them talking about “B”instead.
Let’s not talk about whether the coronavirus “threat” is as big or real as, they say it is, let’s talk instead about masks and whether they can save you from the big scary threat that we assume must be out there, otherwise why are we talking about masks?
It’s called deflecting attention or controlling the narrative.
Imagine a scenario where someone is trying to talk up fear of a vampire apocalypse and convince everybody that vampires are about to take over the planet or some such thing.
Let’s deflect the discussion away from whether vampires are real to talking about the effectiveness of garlic for neutralising the scary vampire hordes.
Imagine if you could get politicians, the MSM and much of the social media all arguing, often quite heatedly and acrimoniously, about the effectiveness of garlic for warding off vampires, which garlic works best against vampires, the chances of getting bitten by a vampire if you don’t use garlic, whether scientific studies on the effectiveness of garlic against vampires are bogus, heart-rending stories of people who got other people killed by vampires because they didn’t use garlic, the virtues of smearing your body with garlic paste (the stats show that NONE of the people who did this got bitten by a vampire), whether people who don’t use garlic have personality defects, whether people who DO have faith in garlic as a defence against vampires are gullible fools, you would probably wind up with people convinced that vampires exist.
Which they don’t.
Or do they?
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.