How we were played – a brief recap of the war on democracy where nothing adds up

Launch the fake scientists!

Intro by Fabian Ubiquitus

The criminal clique that has hijacked the British government and used its position to wreak havoc upon the nation is fast being found out as lie after lie after lie is exposed.

And as a consequence it is fast running out of friends because these crooks are not people anyone wants to be too close to when the you-know-what hits the fan.

Even  amongst traditional conservative groups such as that of  The Conservative Woman website the criticism of the most dishonest wrecking crew in British history the exposés of its malfeasance are both relentless and scathing as you’ll see from the sample article below.

Of course, true conservatives see though the febrile fake conservatism of Johnson and his so-called Gang of Loons, who are about as truly Conservative as Pol Pot. The gang choose after all to be closely advised in matters of mass manipulation and “behavioural change” by such experts as  Professor Susan Michie a leading British Communist Party member.

As as for the notorious Ferguson, we said from the beginning that his track record of wildly inaccurate yet scary predictions should make him the last “expert” you’d want to trot out in before an aghast nation. The inaccuracy of his work was, after all, well known before the Gang of Loons made use of him.

His value to their psyop and its attendant coup was clearly not the accuracy of his predictions. It was how scary they were and how “sciency” they looked so as to bamboozle and scare into compliance what was assumed to be a somewhat timid nation.

The following article is a scathing and damning exposé that hammers yet another very large nail into the government’s coffin. It was published in May 2020 as the patriots of CTW did their best to warn the nation that serious skullduggery was afoot and it is a crying shame that more people did not see or heed it.

Members of our feckless or bought Parliament, for example, or the MSM, all of whom contributed to war against our nation by choosing to ignore facts that were right there in front of their nose.

We are featuring it here now in the hope that the message will finally sink in.

Millions of us are now looking forward to the trials where the Gang of Loons, their puppet masters, cronies and collaborators and the whole sorry crew of enemies of the nation are brought to trial and answer for their crimes.

The source for the following article is here. We highly recommend TCW as an island of sanity in a sea of maliciously manufactured hysteria. Their critiques of Johnson and his crew of lunatics are always worth a read as you will discover.


The strange bedfellows of Professor Panic

A LOT of attention has been given to Professor Neil Ferguson’s dubious track record on epidemics and his equally dubious judgment in meeting his lover on at least two occasions during the lockdown introduced on his own advice.

On closer examination, there are two especially significant elements crying out for independent investigation: the quality and reliability of Ferguson’s computer model, and the political affiliations of his lover.

Firstly, the computer model. The source code behind the Ferguson model has finally been made available to the public via the GitHub website. Mark E Jeftovic, in his Axis of Easy website, says: ‘A code review has been undertaken by an anonymous ex-Google software engineer here, who tells us the GitHub repository code has been heavily massaged by Microsoft engineers, and others, in an effort to whip the code into shape to safely expose it to the public. Alas, they seem to have failed and numerous flaws and bugs from the original software persist in the released version. Requests for the unedited version of the original code behind the model have gone unanswered.’

Jeftovic believes the most worrisome outcome of the model review is that the code produces ‘non-deterministic outputs’. This means that owing to bugs, the code can produce very different results given identical inputs, making the code unsuitable for scientific purposes. Jeftovic says the documentation provided wants the reader to accept that given a ‘starting seed’, the model will always produce the same results. ‘Investigation reveals the truth: the code produces critically different results, even for identical starting seeds and parameters.’

He says that a team even found that the output varied depending on which type of computer it was run on.

Jeftovic cannot understand why the Imperial team failed to realise that their software was so flawed. He quotes the usual computing adage ‘Garbage In/Garbage Out’ which the untrained reader may think is what is being asserted in the code review. In fact, he says, ‘it’s not. What’s being asserted is that output is garbage, regardless of the input. In this case, the output we’re experiencing as a result is a worldwide lockdown and shutdown of the global economy, and we don’t really know if this was necessary or not, because we have no actual data (aside from Sweden) and severely flawed models.’

Another expert, Martin Armstrong (who has a controversial record) also reviews the Ferguson model code and comes to very similar conclusions. He says that it

‘is such a joke it is either an outright fraud, or it is the most inept piece of programming  I have ever seen in my life . . . This is the most unprofessional operation perhaps in computer science. The entire team should be disbanded and an independent team put in place to review the work of Neil Ferguson . . . The only reasonable conclusion I can reach is that this has been deliberately used to justify bogus forecasts intent for political activism . . . There seems to have been no independent review of Ferguson’s work, which is unimaginable!’

Which leads us neatly to the second facet of the affair – the actual ‘affair’ and the politically radical lover.

Professor Ferguson, 51, is said to be estranged from his wife Kim, with whom he has a 17-year-old son.

He is reported to have used the match-finding website OkCupid a year ago to meet Antonia Staats, 38, currently married and living with her husband and two children. Ms Staats is a Left-wing campaigner who works for the US-based online network Avaaz, an organisation that promotes global activism on, among other things, climate change. The Guardian has called Avaaz the globe’s largest and most powerful online activist network, and it has a world-wide following of around 10million people. It is loosely connected with Bill Gates, through the World Economic Forum, which also lists Al Gore and Christine Lagarde on its board. Staats works as a senior campaigner on climate change for the group, and is said to be sympathetic towards the aims of Extinction Rebellion. Indirectly, on the surface at least, this ties Ferguson to climate change, a cause that the lockdown has served very well by managing to shut down the world economy.

Surely it is now time for some genuinely tech-savvy analysis to be carried out on the source coding underlying the doom-laden, and for many of us deeply disturbing, predictions about the forthcoming climate catastrophe? Might it turn out to be just as questionable?


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 2191 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded

1 Comment on How we were played – a brief recap of the war on democracy where nothing adds up

  1. Ferguson is just a glorified snake oil salesman, and his computer model has more problems than just GIGO. It’s FIFO, fantasy in fantasy out. It exemplifies the entire sorry mess that so-called science finds itself in these days.

    Computer modeling is now the substitute for real-world empirical data. Such modeling becomes more and more complex, but thereby has less and less to do with objective feedback. Huge areas of science have been surreptitiously taken over by computer modeling. No wonder self-appointed experts natter endlessly about consensus… they don’t care about real-world empirical data, instead it’s all about which computer model they’ve settled on to advance their political agenda. Then they foist it off on government leaders, commentariat, and general public, no questions allowed.

    Nobody seems to know or care that this is happening. I guess everybody is happy getting bamboozled by pretty graphs and image graphics on the computer screen, generated by millions of lines of code on which nobody could possibly perform a reasonable design review or code walk-thru, let alone verify that its assumptions and parameters are even close to reality. The computer should have been used as an adjunct tool to science, but instead it’s surreptitiously replaced the scientific paradigm, along with all the distortions and undermining of society that inevitably entails.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.