WILL JONES
The DNA contamination found in mRNA vaccines can integrate into the genome of normal human cells, a top molecular scientist has confirmed with an experiment in his lab.
Dr. Phillip J. Buckhaults, a Professor in the Department of Drug Discovery and Biomedical Sciences at the University of South Carolina, carried out the experiment in response to scepticism about earlier findings about DNA contamination and posted the results on X.
Concerns about DNA contamination in mRNA vaccines – a byproduct of their manufacture that should have been removed before use – emerged in early 2023 due to the work of Dr. Kevin McKernan of Medicinal Genomics, a medical research company.
The worries, which have been corroborated and amplified by a number of experts, led Florida Surgeon General Dr. Joseph A. Ladapo to call for a halt to the Covid mRNA vaccine programme last December, noting the risks of genomic integration and cancer formation. Last month, Port Hedland council in Australia voted to notify all of the country’s 537 local councils of the evidence of the DNA contamination in the vaccines and associated risks. However, most regulators have dismissed the concerns, claiming the DNA is not dangerous.
Prof. Buckhaults disagrees, saying the risks must not be dismissed so easily. His own results are hardly reassuring, with the latest confirming that the DNA contamination is certainly capable of integrating into the genome of human cells, where it could change their function. He writes:
The plasmid DNA that is contained within mRNA vaccines can integrate into the genome of normal cells.
I knew this could happen, but some were unconvinced, so we took the time to prove this in the lab.
We grow normal human epithelial stem cells in my lab. It’s part of our normal job (cancer research). They are called organoids. These are not cancer cells, they are just the normal stem cells that make up the human colon.
We ‘vaccinated’ some of these normal cells and grew them for a month and saw pieces of the plasmid DNA persisting in the genomic DNA of the ‘vaccinated’ cells. We detected the plasmid DNA with our qPCR protocol that was posted to X several months ago.
This experiments was done mainly for the people who were paid to publicly ridicule this idea (and slander my reputation). Most of these people are mutually blocked now, so pass around to anyone who needs to see it. Maybe Dr. Paul Offit or that rude Gorsky dude would like to see it. I don’t know.
This does not mean that the integration is happening in real vaccinated humans (those experiments are ongoing) but it does prove that the DNA can get into normal cells just fine, as I told everyone a year ago.
i knew this could happen, but some were unconvinced, so we took the time to prove this in the lab.
we grow normal human epithelial stem cells in my lab. its part of our normal… pic.twitter.com/BMAeeqscKR
— Phillip Buckhaults (@P_J_Buckhaults) November 25, 2024
Other scientists have shown that the mRNA in the vaccines (i.e., the active ingredient rather than the DNA contamination) also has the capacity to integrate into the human genome. Last year, a team from Italy found vaccine spike protein being produced in the blood of Long Covid patients two months after vaccination and an accompanying change in their DNA that could only have come from the vaccine, which they argued could be the source of the persisting spike protein and the Long Covid symptoms.
Professor Buckhaults is among scientists investigating whether similar problems may arise from the DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines.
This article (DNA Contamination of mRNA Vaccines Can Integrate into Human DNA, Top Molecular Scientist Confirms) is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Will Jones
*****
Dr. Peter Kotlár Sounds the Alarm: Are mRNA Vaccines Poisoning the Blood Supply?
“There is a high probability that an unvaccinated patient can be a recipient of blood from a vaccinated person. And so we have vaccinated him against his will.”
AMY MEK
“There is a high probability that an unvaccinated patient can be a recipient of blood from a vaccinated person. And so we have vaccinated him against his will.”
In a fiery and deeply consequential address, Slovak physician and Member of Parliament Dr. Peter Kotlár delivered a stark warning to his nation and the global medical community. Speaking at a press conference following his comprehensive review of Slovakia’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Kotlár raised serious concerns about the safety of mRNA vaccines, the integrity of the blood supply, and what he described as a systematic failure of scientific institutions to address these issues transparently.
“Vaccination Without Consent”
Dr. Kotlár’s speech focused on what he termed the “forced vaccination” of unvaccinated individuals through contaminated blood transfusions. He explained his suspicion that nanolipid particles containing mRNA, which are central to the vaccine mechanism, might persist in the bloodstream of vaccinated individuals and subsequently enter the blood supply.
“If there are nanolipid particles circulating in the bloodstream,” he warned, “there is a high probability that an unvaccinated patient can be a recipient of blood from a vaccinated person. And so we have vaccinated him against his will.”
This assertion, if proven, would not only raise ethical and medical questions but could also constitute a violation of the fundamental human rights of individuals who have chosen not to receive the vaccine.
Demanding Accountability from Slovak Institutions
Dr. Kotlár directly challenged Slovakia’s scientific and regulatory bodies, including the Slovak Academy of Sciences (SAV) and the State Institute for Drug Control (SUKL), to answer four critical questions:
- Do nanolipid particles containing mRNA remain localized at the injection site, or do they circulate in the bloodstream?
- If they circulate, can they contaminate blood reserves during donation?
- Does SAV agree with claims that these particles do not circulate in the bloodstream, as suggested by statements from SAV member Dr. Boris Klempa?
- Were the actual analyses of mRNA vaccines conducted at Slovak facilities, and if so, what were the results?
He emphasized that failing to address these questions transparently “opens [the institutions] up to ridicule” and undermines public trust in Slovakia’s scientific and medical communities. “It is not possible that with so many influences and information that we get from the world, Slovak Science did not fear that someone else would point out what they were supposed to have done,” he added.
Scientific and Ethical Implications
Dr. Kotlár’s critique extended beyond Slovakia, addressing the broader implications for global health. He referenced international studies suggesting that nanolipid particles and mRNA can remain in the bloodstream for 8 to 12 months after vaccination. “This raises a threat of unsolved disputes,” he stated, particularly for unvaccinated individuals who may now be wary of receiving potentially contaminated blood.
Highlighting the ethical dimensions, he said, “A person who refused to be vaccinated and was willing to endure discrimination… will probably also receive the vaccination substance, which he legally refused.”
A Call for Sovereignty in Science and Medicine
Despite his criticisms, Dr. Kotlár expressed confidence in Slovakia’s potential to become a leader in sovereign medical research and policy. He called for the establishment of independent diagnostic, treatment, and prophylactic protocols to protect the nation from future pandemics, free from the influence of global institutions. “The Slovak Republic has the brains to ensure its own sovereign diagnosis, its own sovereign treatment, and its own sovereign prophylaxis in the event of another possible pandemic.”
Conclusion: A Fight for Truth and Transparency
Dr. Kotlár’s remarks strike at the heart of a growing debate over the safety of mRNA vaccines and the trustworthiness of the blood supply. His call for action raises serious questions that demand answers—not just in Slovakia but around the world.
“This is the information I wanted to convey so that the pressure from the public… on these institutions to further verify this information,” he concluded. “Then we will continue.”
The stakes couldn’t be higher. Whether his warnings lead to meaningful investigations and change remains uncertain, but one thing is undeniable: Dr. Kotlár is determined to uncover the truth, no matter the opposition.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply