Coronavirus: the actual risk in its proper perspective

by Jon Davy

The government’s own Chief Medical Officer, Chris Whitty explained in a recent biefing how low the risk is statistically of dying from or with COVD19.

His data gels well with data emerging from myriad other experts who also point out that this virus is a lot less deadly than we were given to believe and that its true death stats are somewhere in the ball park of a flu epidemic.

Which of course begs the question that, given that the government KNOWS that the death risk is no worse than a bad flu outbreak, plus high amongst very old or already very sick people and almost negligible for everybody else, why the hell have we got the entire country locked down?

Are we gloing ti wreck the economy and give gthe heaklthy citizenry a hard time every time there is a flu outbreak?

It also begs the question as to why the government cannot even keep its propaganda straight.


Let’s take a look at London, population just over 9 million people.

Many of these have throughout this “epidemic” been cramming along with hundreds of thousands of others into tubes and buses in the usual way day in and day out.

How many would you imagine have died of COVID-19, a disease supposedly so terrible that even millions of healthy people have to be quarantined in their own homes?

A thousand? That would be bad. Ten thousand? Well, yes that would be really bad. After all, London is the epicentre of the U.K, which persuaded our dopey government to build the (still empty) Nightingale Hospital there, in an effort to cope with “all those Covid19 cases”.

Well, hold onto your hat while I give you the actual shocking figure – albeit it may have changed by the time you read this.

The number of deaths – orย  I should say suspected deaths because the true numnber of people actually killed by this virus and not other causes such as incorrect intubnbationย  could even be lowerย  – from COVID19 is ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ

That’s right. ๐“๐ก๐ž ๐ญ๐จ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฆ๐›๐ž๐ซ ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ก๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐ž๐ซ๐ž ๐‚๐Ž๐•๐ˆ๐ƒ-๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— is ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐จ๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐๐ž๐š๐ญ๐ก ๐œ๐ž๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐Ÿ๐ข๐œ๐š๐ญ๐ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ.

There were over 5,400 who died of heart attacks, falls, old age, cancer and so forth who were tested as a routine and found with a coronavirus in their system but they did not die of it.

Coronavirus covers a number of viruses and they are very common. So “pandemic” or no pandemic if you start testing deceased people for Coronavirus, a large number will test positive for a Coronavirus.

What this boils down to is that, statistically, the real risk of dying from COVID-19 in London, the UKs largest and most densely populated city, is 0.1%. This is probabaly a lot less than the likelihood of being run over by one of those buses people are crammed into.

And of those 120 who died, the majority wereย  over 80, with the rest falling in the over 65 age group.

The fact is the epidemic was talked up and talked up to a point where we all accepted the Lockdown as “unavoidable”.

If we had simply been presented with Chris Whitty’s briefing and the fact that 120 people over 65 in London were probably, but even then not conclusively, killed by this virus and then told, “So we are going to lock down the entire country, snatch away your fundamental liberties and human rights, ruin your livelihoods, stop treating other patients in need such as heart and cancer patients and generally lower your standard of living”, would you have accepgted it so readily?

The chances are you would have concluded that your government had lost its mind.

The fact of the matter is the governmt KNOWS that COVID19 is not as deadly as it led us to believe.

So the Lockdown is not about “saving lives” or “saving the NHS”. That’s the PR/propaganda line.

The real intention of our governbment and whoever happoens to be pulling its strings is something else entirely.


The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations โ€ฆ (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of โ€œfair useโ€ in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than โ€œfair useโ€ you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 2192 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.