CCC False Reports and “gullible” Politicians. Deception or Duplicity?

This item was featured on WebWide News

So, the following article contends that the government’s Climate Change Committee has deceived Parliament with false reports and stat fiddles into seriously underestimating the true cost of Net Zero, which in any case has been a catastrophically unworkable solution to a falsely portrayed “problem”

We are looking at the further calculated destruction of the British economy (and with it our standard of living and the futures of our children) on false pretences.

An “inquiry” – if we ever get a honest one trying to find the truth as opposed to the usual covering up of political culpability – should look very closely at WHO precisely concocted these false reports and pushed them and which politicians exactly were party to the deceit because the false reports merely justify the agenda of dismantling the British economy.

There are two ways of looking at it, two narratives:

On the one hand there is the narrative that our well-intentioned and trustworthy but incredibly gullible political elite was fooled by lies fabricated by the CCC and went into panic mode without bothering to check or verify the data it was given.

On the other hand there is the narrative that the false reports concocted by the CCC were desired by the political elite because they provided a spurious justification for the economic attack on our lives. The CCC and its political masters were in fact co-conspirators and now that lots of people have seen through the deception, one co-conspirator (the political elite) is shifting the blame onto the CCC.

I’ll leave you to decide which is true. I know which narrative is the mot credible to me.

We need to start unearthing WHO PRECISELY is responsible for these attacks on our nation’s wellbeing and who precisely are their puppet masters.

Climate Change Committee “deceived Parliament and the British people”

SOURCE: NET ZERO WATCH

The Government is facing demands to launch an urgent inquiry into the conduct of the Climate Change Committee (CCC), as evidence accumulates that the cost of Net Zero will be trillions of pounds more costly than the Committee has claimed.

The call comes in the wake of comments from Olivier Blanchard, a former chief economist at the IMF, who told the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee that Net Zero will be “much more expensive than people imagine”.

Mr Blanchard’s remarks are just the latest confirmation that the public have been systematically misled over the cost of Net Zero :

In 2021, it was revealed that the CCC had used spurious weather data in their modelling, thus enabling them to reduce the capacity of electricity generation and storage equipment apparently required.
It was also revealed that the CCC used spurious figures for the cost of electric vehicles, thus reducing the apparent costs.
More recently, the CCC admitted that its electricity system modelling is inadequate. The resulting understatement of costs is as much as tens of billions of pounds per year.
It has also been revealed that the CCC “waves away” most of the cost problem, simply by assuming extraordinary cost reductions in future. With current technology, the cost of Net Zero will be hundreds of billions of pounds higher.

And the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Lord Hammond, has said, quite bluntly that the political establishment has been “systematically dishonest” about the cost of Net Zero.

Net Zero Watch director Andrew Montford said:

There is no longer any doubt that the Climate Change Committee has deceived Parliament and the British people. The only question is whether Rishi Sunak is going to do anything about it. He has a simple choice – launch an inquiry into the Climate Change Committee and all the other institutions involved in the deception, or go down in history as a party to the fraud.

Please visit Steve Cook for fiction, non-fiction, poetry, humor and satire

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.