106 peer-reviewed studies confirm the good news for everyone who’s had the bug

For a group claiming to "follow the science" the government sure ignores a lot of science

A List of 106 Peer-Reviewed Studies Affirming The Power of Natural COVID Immunity

  • The Facts:
    • There are over 106 studies examining evidence of immunity gained from COVID infection versus COVID-19 vaccine induced immunity as of October 15th 2021.
    • The science illustrates that natural immunity is more robust.
    • The power of natural immunity has remained somewhat unacknowledged by the CDC throughout this pandemic.
    • The CDC still recommends those who recovered from natural infection from COVID be vaccinated.
  • Reflect On:
    • With COVID having such a high survival rate for people who are generally healthy, what’s wrong with allowing them to acquire natural immunity through infection?
    • Why is natural immunity rarely considered when it comes to health policy like vaccine mandates?

Pause – set your Pulse…

Published science examining the power of naturally acquired immunity to COVID and its variants via a COVID infection continues to show how strong natural immunity really is. But there’s one big problem that has plagued humanity for a long time, and that’s the politicization of science.

Epidemiologist Dr Paul Elias Alexander PhD is a former assistant professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine and research methods. He’s also a former COVID Pandemic evidence-synthesis consultant advisor to WHO-PAHO Washington, DC (2020) and former senior advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in Health and Human Services (HHS) Washington, DC. He recently published an article for the Brownstone Institute pointing out,

“Public health officials and the medical establishment with the help of the politicized media are misleading the public with assertions that the COVID-19 shots provide greater protection than natural immunity. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky, for example, was deceptive in her October 2020 published LANCET statement that “there is no evidence for lasting protective immunity to SARS-CoV-2 following natural infection” and that “the consequence of waning immunity would present a risk to vulnerable populations for the indefinite future.”

The Brownstone Institute

Brownstone Institute had previously documented 30 studies on natural immunity as it relates to Covid-19.  They have now provided a follow up chart that they claim, “is the most updated and comprehensive library list of 106 of the highest-quality, complete, most robust scientific studies and evidence reports/position statements on natural immunity.”

Unlike the short-term protection offered by the vaccines, the protection generated by infection has been shown to be both durable and broad. If governments hadn’t been so hasty to get the vaccines out and had demanded six months of follow-up rather than two, the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines wouldn’t have been approved due to the severe decline in efficacy over time.

Furthermore, COVID vaccines do not reduce transmission as pointed out by Alexander in his article. I also provide several examples in an article I recently published, here, about this fact. This is not a pandemic of the unvaccinated as politicians have claimed.

For a period of time, COVID vaccines do provide protection against severe symptoms and death, but this benefits the individual who chooses to vaccinate themselves. It may also benefit hospitals but we must remember that hospitals had these struggles prior to the pandemic as well.

It doesn’t mean one is protecting another person by getting vaccinated. Vaccines can certainly benefit at risk people, older people, and people with multiple co-morbidities like obesity, diabetes or heart disease. The vast majority of people who have died of or with COVID in the US have been people with two or more co-morbidities.

Why hasn’t government health policy acknowledged the power of natural immunity? With COVID having a 99.97% survival rate for children, and a similar survival rate for healthy people under the age of 70, why can’t people have the right to choose what goes inside their body?

For some, the risk of injury from the vaccine itself may be greater than the risk of injury, death, and hospitalization from COVID.

List of 106 Studies on Natural Immunity

Please click here to find the rest of this important article


The People’s Media

TLBTALK – FOR FREEDOM FIGHTERS


••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 1424 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded
Contact: Website

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: