Why Starmer is still doomed

PM has staved off immediate threat but he is now captive to Labour’s Left, which is not what Britain voted for

DANIEL MARTIN

Sir Keir Starmer was in a defiant mood as he addressed Labour MPs on Monday evening, declaring: “I have won every fight I have ever been in”.

And, no doubt, the Prime Minister would have slept more soundly having staved off an immediate threat to his political survival.

In a rapid and effective whipping operation, Cabinet ministers were ordered to post their support for Sir Keir after Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, called for him to quit.

But, in the cold light of a new day, Sir Keir will also be aware that this has only bought him more time.

Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader, called No 10’s breathing space a “stay of execution”. She posted: “Starmer is now in office but not in power”.

The dramatic events of Monday may have left the Prime Minister in post at Number 10, but he is now the effective captive of his own Cabinet and the soft-Left rump of backbench MPs who will demand a radical political reset.

And a Left-wing package of policies is not what Britain voted for in 2024.

Sir Keir, and his now ex-chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, planned to govern from the centre ground.

They built a political platform that was designed to appeal to the Red Wall voters of the Midlands and the North as much as progressive city urban elites.

Sir Keir will find before too long that Cabinet members who came out one by one to support him on Monday will want something in return for their loyalty.

Newly emboldened, they are set to shift Labour to the Left with policies that will prioritise the fight against the Greens over the threat of Reform UK.

This shift was in evidence on Tuesday morning when Ed Miliband, the Net Zero Secretary, went out to represent the Government on the airwaves.

He called on Sir Keir to lead a “moment of change” and tackle one of his personal priorities: the class divide.

“One of the things I’ve been talking about this whole period is saying more about that,” he said.

The Telegraph: continue reading

The Labour Party has doomed itself to oblivion

DANIEL HANNAN

Labour MPs have chosen to make themselves accomplices, to take on their leader’s guilt by association. Until yesterday evening, they might plausibly have piled the blame onto Keir Starmer, booted him out and had another go. With his propensity for flip-flopping, his self-contradictions and his terrible judgment, he might have served as a sin-eater or scapegoat.

But, as the Cabinet endorsements came in one by one, each hailing Starmer as a visionary leader with a thumping mandate from the nation, it became clear that Labour was opting to take ownership of his failures.

It was hard not to think of the Ancient Mariner’s crewmates, who condemned themselves to his fate when they applauded him for shooting the albatross:

Nor dim nor red, like God’s own head,

The glorious Sun uprist:

Then all averred, I had killed the bird

That brought the fog and mist.

’Twas right, said they, such birds to slay,

That bring the fog and mist.

In much the same way, Labour MPs who hammered on the desks when he entered Committee Room 14 on Monday might as well have been hammering themselves into the ground.

For there is, let’s be honest, absolutely no chance of things turning around under his leadership. His failures are intrinsic, inevitable, inescapable. As long as he is in Number 10, the country will get poorer, public services will deteriorate and we shall carry on with the extraordinary achievement of having simultaneous immigration and emigration crises.

Why? It comes down to character. While it is theoretically possible to do things that will generate economic growth, such as cutting spending and removing regulations, there is zero possibility that a man like Starmer, mediocre, focused on process, would countenance the short-term unpopularity involved.

Similarly, while one could see a way to secure our borders, it would involve doing radical things, such as quitting international conventions, curtailing the powers of judicial review and constraining activist judges. Again, there is zero possibility of Starmer doing any of those things. As he told his biographer, Tom Baldwin: ‘There is no version of my life that does not largely revolve around me being a human rights lawyer.’

It is sometimes said that Starmer has no convictions, but one belief has motivated him at every stage in his life, whether as the editor of a Trotskyite newspaper, as Director of Public Prosecutions, as a Corbyn yes-man or as a hapless prime minister, namely his belief that, while national loyalties are arbitrary and transient, human rights are universal and absolute.

‘It would be to this country’s shame if we lost the clear and basic statements of our citizens’ human rights provided by the Human Rights Act on the basis of a fundamentally flawed analysis of their origin and relevance to our society,’ he declared in 2009. ‘The idea that these human rights should somehow stop in the English Channel is odd and, frankly, impossible to defend.’

Sure enough, we got confirmation this week that more people had arrived in illegal Channel crossings under Starmer than under any previous prime minister.

Odd, isn’t it? The last government was thrown out because of public anger about two issues above all: a failing economy and excessive immigration. People were so angry with the Tories (understandably in many ways) that they did not look too closely at the alternative. Starmer took office, firehosed cash at public sector workers and benefits claimants and cancelled the Rwanda scheme. That is the record Labour MPs are now choosing to extend.

Even if they later change their minds, the damage has been done. I remember my incredulity when, as late as December 2018, 200 Conservative MPs voted to keep Theresa May as their leader. True, she was later ousted, and Boris Johnson briefly turned things around. But the long-term reputational damage is felt to this day. When disgruntled former Tories damn the party collectively, it is this record, consciously or not, that informs their mood.

Similarly, while a new Labour leader might have a brief honeymoon, the party has doomed itself. The next election will do for them as surely as the curse did for Coleridge’s sailors:

One after one, by the star-dogged Moon,

Too quick for groan or sigh,

Each turned his face with a ghastly pang,

And cursed me with his eye.

Four times fifty living men,

(And I heard nor sigh nor groan)

With heavy thump, a lifeless lump,

They dropped down one by one.

Click here to subscribe to our daily briefing – the best pieces from CapX and across the web.

CapX depends on the generosity of its readers. If you value what we do, please consider making a donation.

---

This article (The Labour Party has doomed itself to oblivion) was created and published by CapX and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Daniel Hannan

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.