Vote Green, get concrete
NIALL MCCRAE
The rise of the Green Party will be confirmed next week when, by my prediction, it wins the Denton & Gorton by-election, adding to the party’s four Westminster seats gained in the 2024 general election. This highly publicised triumph will solidify the role of the Greens as the left-wing polar opposite to Reform, both parties gnawing at the carcasses of the failing duopoly of Labour and Conservative.
Party leader Zack Polanski is the new darling of the Left, promoted by the likes of Owen Jones as some kind of Messiah. He was born in Salford as David Paulden, a name he changed by deed poll at the age of 18, to reclaim his Jewish heritage (and also to detach from his stepfather).
Mainstream media, which always follow any mention of Tommy Robinson with ‘real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon’ never do the same with Polanski. Another interesting point is that Jews in the Anglosphere have tended to go the other way – Anglicising their names (Hollywood actors particularly). Being Jewish is not a handicap to Polanski in a country of growing Muslim population, because he is a supporter of the Palestinian cause, and campaigners like nothing more than Jews joining the struggle.
The main flaw with the Green Party is not the insufferable Woke moralising of its politicians, but its lack of genuinely green policies. Of course it pushes Net Zero, but if carbon consumption is the big danger to humanity and our environment, why pursue open borders and the consequence of limitless levels of immigration?
The educated idiocy of the progressive ‘green’ movement knows no bounds. All schoolchildren are indoctrinated on a contrived climate emergency and the need to ‘save the planet’, but as universities are a finishing school for the doomsday cult, it is the intellectual class that is most puritanical. The Labour Party, having disillusioned many of its idealistic followers, is steadily losing support to the Green Party.
The Green Party has no interest in the conservative idyll of a green and pleasant land. Instead, it is like a watermelon – a thin coating of green on the outside, but red within. Its policies would create a very ungreen and unpleasant land, in which fields are replaced by acres of solar panels, views over rolling hills are blighted by a profusion of wind turbines, and the green belt is buried under the concrete of ‘fairer housing’.
Owen Jones epitomises this lunacy. In a Guardian column last year, he urged the Green Party to ‘stop being polite and start picking some fights’. He criticised the uninspiring social media activity of the Greens, asking ‘where was their Save Our Grannies campaign over the winter fuel payment, with a short video offering emotional testimonies from struggling pensioners?’
Does Jones really think that ecological zealots want elderly white people to pump more gas into their homes? You may recall a spin-off from Extinction Rebellion under the banner ‘Insulate Britain’, which to anyone alert to green purgatory was really to reduce energy usage. Jones railed against the ‘unprecedented squeeze in living standards and a crumbling public realm’, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Green Party policies are designed to curtail consumption and service provision (for example, reducing to monthly rubbish collection in Bristol).
In the comments beneath the article, someone remarked on the incongruence of the Green Party favouring unlimited immigration while opposing development. Another person corrected this erroneous presumption: the Greens want both! The manifesto on ‘fair housing’ pledges to ‘provide 150,000 new social homes every year’. Every town would become a forest of cranes and piledrivers for massive schemes of apartment blocks, because ‘the Green Pary wants to see a world without borders’.
As any critic of mass immigration knows, it is difficult to get an answer to the pressing question: how many millions should the UK accommodate, before it’s too many? Greens and leftists won’t give an upper limit.
While Keir Starmer’s government is plumbing the depths of unpopularity, Jones sees an opportunity for the Greens, proclaiming that ‘the party brims with the confidence in the moral righteousness of its cause’. Rather like the Bolsheviks, the Nazis, or the Great Reset. Some readers commented on the road to Hell being paved with good intentions, but are the motives of the party’s leaders and financial backers really benevolent?
The Green Party’s vision is a hideous dystopia. As described in my book Green in Tooth and Claw, the movement started with genuine concern for the environment, striving for harmony between nature and humankind, but it was soon hijacked by Marxists and then by globalist totalitarians who want to impoverish, enslave and depopulate. The Greens like major high-rise housing development because it facilitates the carbon-control Smart City concept.
You don’t need conspiracy theory to see where the Green Party would lead us. Just read the manifesto on the party website. Vote Green, get concrete – with the host community overwhelmed by African and Asian migrants (sorry – ‘climate refugees’). How else could you foresee the outcome of its policies?
As more and more of our precious countryside and fertile agricultural land is lost to housing estates, and none of the major parties intend to do anything meaningful to stop the influx, we should conclude that Britain doesn’t need Green or Reform – it needs to refarm.
This article (Vote Green, get concrete) was created and published by Niall McCrae and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply