Vaccine Skulduggery Afoot

And why we must wring the truth from our government albeit they won't cough it up without some persuasion.

by Fabian Ubiquitus

In the field of governance, the degree of complexity is directly proportional to the degree of skulduggery.

I think this might be a natural law but if not, certainly a useful rule of thumb. And speaking of skulduggery . . .

The following quotes are from a very important artricle by Dr Mercola.

The whole thing is well worth a read but it is quite heavy going as it is fiull of technical terms (you’ll need a good online medical dictionary).

To summarise the article, the writer points out that COVID vaccines may be booby-trapped in so far as, whilst they “work” in clinical trials (such as they are) in terms of lessening symptoms, when the vaccinated person comes into contact with a wild virus, they are likely to experience a WORSENED reaction compared to an unvaccinated person. The article goes into great detail as to how and why this reversal of immune response can be triggered by some vaccines

In other words, the vaccine may be booby-trapped and will wind up killing more people. Please do not take my word for it and read the article for yourself and make up your own mind.

If you conclude that my concerns are founded, make up your own mind as to whether the alleged booby-trapping of the vaccine is deliberate and intentional or accidental – and whether the government is aware of the problem.

Matt Hancock on Question Time was asked by someone whether he would himself take the vaccine. His bland reply was that he would “have no problem with that” But then he hastened to add that “of ocourse, ” he would not want to jump the queue.

I bet he ruddy wouldn’t.

Personally, I think that he, the Prime Muppet and the entire gang of crooks and their accomplices in Parliament SHOULD jump the queue and they and their families should be the very first to be injected with this rushed and poorly tested vaccine.

Then we can all see how trhey get on when they come into contact with the wild virus. I’m sure that if it is as safe as they are telling us they won’t mind a bit, especially as it woul;d put the nation’s mind at rest.

But we’d have to scrutinise, control and monitor this thoroughly to ensure no cheating or faking takes place.

My hypothesis is that what is happening here is some sort of cull of the sick and elderly – perhaps to “solve” the problem of longevity and the burden it places on pensions and so forth. Apparently, by putting a stop to longevity – a typically psychotic solution to a Good Thing (people living longer) made into a Bad Thing that has to be “solved” by killing people.

Please bear in mind this is a hypthosesis of mine – something worth looking over and seeing whether it is borne out by events or predicts events. It is not proven. It is of concern to me not least because I am getting on a bit myself and would be a prime candidate for a bit of culling by way of a “helpful” vaccine “for my own good” or even a DNR order should I keel over from a heart attack or some such thing.

The unpleasantness and intimidation being shoved down our throats via the lockdown, bankrupting cafes and pubs and much of the leisure industry and so forth against the background of the Chief Medical Officer himself telling us very clearly that the vast majority of us who are not old and frail have nothing to worry about from COVID19 make sense if the old and frail are the target.

When the vaccine comes along and is targeted at the old folk (and that will be YOU one day dear reader) and it is made clear that once all the vulnerable people (those “in danger”) are vaccinated, we can all get back to normal, we”ll all be very keen (the masterminds behind this sly genocide hope) for grandma and grandad to get innoculated “for their own good”.

And if lots of old people die in the near future, well it wil be explained away by their advanced age or the “virus is more dangerous to old peole than we thought” or the deaths will be attributed to some other cause.

Whether my hypothesis pans out remains to be seen but it seems to me we have to be very wary of this vaccine and ask questions and dig and probe like never before and NEVER take anything this government tells us at face value.

Whatever turns out to be at the bottom of it, we KNOW we have been lied to at every turn and that little or nothing about this virus and the government’s response to it makes rational sense

There is skulguggery afoot. We must wring the truth from our government, whatever it is, albeit the government is not going to cough it up without some persuasion.

Maybe there are one or two honest people in Parliament who might be brave enough to lend us a hand.

Anyway, here are quotes from the article, followed by a link to the full article, which I recommend.

“In all likelihood, regardless of how effective (or ineffective) the COVID-19 vaccines end up being, they’ll be released to the public in relatively short order. .. . ”

“Ironically, the data we now have no longer support a mass vaccination mandate, considering the lethality of COVID-19 is lower than the flu for those under the age of 60.20<

“If you’re under the age of 40, your risk of dying from COVID-19 is just 0.01%, meaning you have a 99.99% chance of surviving the infection. And you could improve that to 99.999% if you’re metabolically flexible and vitamin D replete.

“So, really, what are we protecting against with a COVID-19 vaccine?

“[T]he vaccines aren’t even designed to prevent infection, only reduce the severity of symptoms. Meanwhile, they could potentially make you sicker once you’re exposed to the virus. That seems like a lot of risk for a truly questionable benefit”<

“[C]onsider . . . . the risk of vaccine-induced immune enhancement and dysfunction, particularly for the elderly, the very people who would need the protection a vaccine might offer the most

“Since the 1960s, tests of vaccine candidates for diseases such as dengue, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) have shown a paradoxical phenomenon

“Some animals or people who received the vaccine and were later exposed to the virus developed more severe disease than those who had not been vaccinated. The vaccine-primed immune system, in certain cases, seemed to launch a shoddy response to the natural infection …This immune backfiring, or so-called immune enhancement, may manifest in different ways such as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE), a process in which a virus leverages antibodies to aid infection . . . ”

Read the full article here:


Related article

https://www.winterwatch.net/2020/04/godfather-of-vaccines-freely-admits-to-unethical-skulduggery-during-legal-deposition/

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

About Steve Cook 899 Articles
Director, UK Reloaded
Contact: Website

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


%d bloggers like this: