UK Ad BANNED For Showing Black Harasser – Multiple Ads With White Harassers Were Just Fine

Truth too offensive?

STEVE WATSON

In a glaring display of selective outrage, Transport for London (TfL) has yanked an advert depicting a black teenager harassing a white girl on a bus – all because of a single complaint crying “racial stereotypes.” Meanwhile, multiple past ads, all featuring white men as the aggressors, were approved, exposing the double standards that shield uncomfortable realities from public view.

The controversial ad was part of TfL’s “Act Like a Friend” campaign, aimed at encouraging bystanders to intervene in cases of sexual harassment or ‘hate crimes’ on public transport.

In the short clip, a black teenage boy verbally harasses a young white girl, with his white friend sitting nearby, effectively boxing her in. But according to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), this portrayal – when viewed in isolation – “reinforced a negative racial stereotype” associating black males with threatening behavior.

The ASA’s ruling came after just one complaint, deeming the ad “irresponsible” and likely to cause “serious offence.”

They stated: “We understood there was a negative racial stereotype based on the association between black males, including teenagers, and threatening behaviour. […] The ad, when seen in isolation, had the effect of perpetuating a negative racial stereotype about black men as perpetrators of threatening behaviour.”

TfL was ordered to ensure future ads avoid such “harmful stereotypes.”

TfL even defended the campaign, noting it featured a diverse range of scenarios to reflect London’s population. Other cut-downs included a white male committing a hate crime against a black woman and another white male targeting a white male victim.

Ah yes, but any instance of a black person being the aggressor must be purged. That is not allowed, because clearly it NEVER happens in London and it’s racist. OK?

TfL issued a an apology, with a spokeswoman remarking “Our aim is to ensure that our advertising reflects London’s diverse population and does not perpetuate any stereotypes. […] We’re sorry that this social media advert […] falls below our usual high standards when viewed in isolation.”

Of course, similar government anti-harassment ads have repeatedly cast white men as the sole perpetrators, with diverse victims – and that seems to be just fine.

White villains are fair game, but anything else gets labeled a “negative racial stereotype.”

This episode underscores the woke stranglehold on media and advertising. In a city where harassment reports surge amid unchecked borders, honest campaigns should be encouraged, not censored. The left’s obsession with “equity” blinds them to actual threats, leaving women – especially native Brits – more vulnerable.

TfL’s quick capitulation to one complaint shows how easily truth is suppressed. If ads with white harassers face no backlash, why the uproar here? It’s a clear case of protecting narratives over people.

Your support is crucial in helping us defeat mass censorship. Please consider donating via Locals or check out our unique merch. Follow us on X @ModernityNews.


This article (UK Ad BANNED For Showing Black Harasser – Multiple Ads With White Harassers Were Just Fine) was created and published by Modernity News and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Steve Watson

See Related Article Below

White men always have to be the bad guys on TV. And now, we can see why

A TfL advert has been banned for portraying a black man as an aggressor. It seems only Caucasian males are allowed to be villains

MICHAEL DEACON

Transport for London (TfL) has had to pull part of its latest video campaign against harassment of female passengers because, in the offending clip, the man who was shown pestering a woman happened to be black (while the woman happened to be white). And, after receiving a single complaint from the public, the Advertising Standards Authority ruled that the clip “had the effect of perpetuating a negative racial stereotype about black men as perpetrators of threatening behaviour”.

Frankly, I’m amazed. Not that the clip has been banned, but that it got made in the first place. Normally, after all, the villains in such campaigns are just about always portrayed as white. Take, for example, the video from TfL’s own “Report It to Stop It” campaign of 2016, which showed a non-white woman being harassed on the Tube by a white man in a suit.

It’s the same in other countries. In Australia, a 2024 poster campaign against “street harassment” depicted white men pestering non-white women. And in Germany last year, remarkably, a poster campaign against sexual harassment in swimming pools depicted a white woman – yes, woman – grabbing the bottom of a horrified looking non-white man, alongside the slogan, “Stop! No groping!”

What do we think would explain this striking trend? Personally, I somehow doubt the people behind such campaigns seriously believe that 100 per cent of sexual harassment is perpetrated by white men – or, indeed, by white, German women. I suspect they merely make it look as if it is because otherwise, they risk being accused of “perpetuating a negative racial stereotype”. And that could get them into terrible trouble.

A similar phenomenon may be observed in films and TV dramas. In 2018, diversity campaigners launched something called “The Riz Test” (named after the British Muslim actor, Riz Ahmed). It dictates that if any fictional Muslim character is depicted as “the perpetrator of terrorism” (or as “irrationally angry”, “misogynistic”, “culturally backwards” or “a threat to a Western way of life”), then “the film/TV show fails the test”.

The film and TV industries have clearly taken these strictures to heart. Because nowadays, as you may have noticed, fictional terrorists – and fictional villains in general – almost always seem to be played by white men.

The Telegraph: continue reading

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*