The Grand Unifying Theory Redux

Recently, when Tom Armstrong published The Grand Unifying Theory of Woke and Globalist Ideology he stole a march on me. By coincidence, I’d roughed an outline for a broadly similar article which I was just about to make a start on. Oh well, score that one off – or so I thought. I commented on Tom’s piece along those lines (after saying jolly good) and he as good as instructed me to write it anyway, so here it is. Sort of. It’s not exactly as it would have been because it’s an adjunct to Tom’s article.

Tom made a start with the climate fraud, which is as good a place to start as any because it’s the climate fraud which is the major tool being used to change our energy infrastructure, land use, transport and food supply. It’s certainly where I started because I’d been a climate sceptic more or less since Al Gore’s ridiculous “An Inconvenient Truth” was unleashed on an unsuspecting world – long since Trumped by many inconvenient facts. I won’t bore you with the details of how or why I became a climate sceptic which is something now better described as being a climate realist anyway.

Everything about it was odd: The lack of open debate in the media (the science is settled- er, no, it isn’t), the name-calling (deniers!), the shoe-horning of it into every radio and television programme (Attenborough, you fraudster) and the ridiculing and cancelling of those who dared to question the ‘narrative’ (Dr. David Bellamy). All this created deep suspicions which sent me into obsessive research mode on the subject. It wasn’t long before I knew it was a Grand Lie. I was going to say hoax, but it isn’t a hoax because the word hoax implies that there is an element of humour in it. There is nothing at all humorous about the damage the climate fraudsters have been able to inflict on our economy and way of life.

The Convid scam was something else. What did TPTB really think people were going to do with all that enforced leisure time while they were penned in their homes? They must have known we’d work it all out, mustn’t they? They’re surely not that stupid? By May 2020 I knew something was seriously wrong and off I went down rabbit hole after rabbit hole. I covered a whole warren and more, catching a lot of bunnies in the process, even if I didn’t come face to face with General Woundwort himself.

It’s been quite a re-education over the last five years plus. Just about everything I thought I knew and understood about the World has been upended and turned inside out. I had to accept that I should assume everything I have been told is very possibly a lie so I should look at all a priori knowledge with a deeply sceptical eye. I became obsessive again until, finally, I’d got enough answers to build up an overall picture of the state of play. I then felt a curious sense of relief wash over me followed by complete calm. I’d cracked it, even if I didn’t really know even half of it – as we are going to be finding out as 2026 unfolds.

So, if Climate and Covid are grand frauds, what else is? How far back does this go? The further back one goes, the further back one needs to go. Gulf War 2? We know about that – Saddam had ‘Weapons of Mass Destruction’ (no, he didn’t). Afghanistan? (9/11 was a false flag), Gulf War 1, triggered by Saddam’s invasion of Kuwait? Was he manipulated into it? As far as I know no-one has dived into this yet. It’s plausible. Vietnam? (The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a false flag). The Korean War? WW2 and WW1? Well, they didn’t start the way we have been told they started. And on and on it goes until, as far as we in modern Britain are concerned, things started to go wrong when William III and Mary II, the joint Monarchs, replaced James II and VII at the request of a Parliamentary faction which then proceeded to claim sovereignty for itself  – at a time when Parliament did not represent the people.

Let’s not dwell on the 18^th Century wars, the French Revolution, the 1832 and 1848 waves of revolutions, Crimea, the Boer Wars, other conflicts of Empire and the World Wars and who was behind them (though we now have a good idea). Let’s just deal with the post WW2 order and the recent past, the here and now.

There is one name, above all, which sticks out – ROCKEFELLER. There are, or were, others of course – Warburg, Schiff, Morgan, for example. It’s a vast complex web from London to New York and Washington which only a determined and single-minded researcher can begin to unravel and thankfully there have been a good number of those who have shared the fruits of their labour. And who is behind them? – ROTHSCHILD. But is it even the Rothschilds who are at the apex in the Central Banking and fiat currency system? There are plenty of hypotheses stretching from the thirteen bloodlines of Springmeier, through the swamps of post-Roman Venice to the thalassocracy of Phoenicia and earlier.

These are the powers that have come to control governments and play the geo-politics game. Geo-politics is what it is all about and geo-politics is about three things – oligarchs, resources and trade routes and who among the oligarchs controls the resources and trade routes. It’s done not for the general good of the people among whom they exist and, by sleight of hand exploit and rule over, but for their own aggrandisement, their own power, their own wealth. We must be under no illusions, the democracy we think we have in the Western nations is an illusion. We live in oligarchies.

Oligarchs control governments by controlling political parties through funding, corruption and blackmail (Epstein). Political parties are therefore their tools. In our system, that is what party whips are for. The parties themselves are petty oligarchies as anyone who has been a member can tell you. Reform UK is too. The jury is forming on Advance UK. It may be or, it is to be hoped, it may not be. The problem, the real problem, is the party system itself, as identified by Belloc and Chesterton nearly a hundred and twenty years ago. The party system is the World Revolution, an oligarchic project.

The left-right dichotomy in Western democracies is an illusion as all parties are controlled from above and used to divide and rule. Don’t look to your side for your enemy; instead, look up. But bear in mind that your real enemy above you has placed at your side elements which mean to do you real harm.

Back to the Rockefellers.

The first attempt to pull the world together under a single supra-national organisation was the League of Nations. The Rockefellers were involved. It failed but it was replaced after WW2 by the United Nations which was created with Rockefeller involvement again as has everything which springs from the United Nations such as UNESCO, WHO and the IPCC.

Prior to the UN, the IMF and the World Bank group had been established with the close involvement of the Fabian John Maynard Keynes. David Rockefeller had a keen interest in the Fabian Society and made large grants to the London School of Economics, founded by Fabians, such that the LSE became known as “Rockefeller’s baby”.

The founding of supra-national organisations continued starting with the Bilderburg Group. Although no Rockefeller is cited as being among the founders, they cannot have failed to pay close attention to it since it was inching towards the idea of a One World government.

In the mid 1950s, in the Special Studies Project of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the idea of climate change began to take shape. The RBF was the tax-exempt foundation of the five sons of John D Rockjefeller Jnr – John III, Nelson, Winthrop, Laurence and the youngest, David.

By the late 1960s things were getting ready. The Club of Rome was formed with the close involvement of David Rockefeller. From this came the ideas of limits to growth, population control and eventually population reduction.

In the early 1970s, the European Management Forum was founded which later became the World Economic Forum – David Rockefeller again.

The various persons we have come to know and loathe who helped in these were:

At the UN, Maurice Strong – a Rockefeller stooge, also in the Club of Rome and the mastermind behind the Rio Earth Summit in 1992.

In the US government – Henry Kissinger – a Rockefeller stooge from early days in the RBF.

Klaus Schwab – a Kissinger-mentored Rockefeller stooge placed at the WEF.

Then came the Trilateral Commission – David Rockefeller once more. This time with Zbignieuw Brzezinski and Jimmy Carter. Rockefeller and Brzezinski controlled Carter when he became President. Kier Starmer is, or was, a member of the Trilateral Commission at the same time as Jeffrey Epstein.

With Brzezinski came the revival of technocracy, the plan to have the world controlled in ‘technates’ run by scientists, experts and managers through the total technological surveillance and control of the masses, including the management of their numbers. Exactly what Zamyatin, Huxley and Orwell warned about in We, Brave New World and 1984, although in Huxley’s case it wasn’t so much a warning as a statement of intent.

There were naturally many, many others who either wittingly or unwittingly aided the Rockefeller projects aimed at creating a One World Government including, with his Terra Carta and involvement in the launch of The Great Reset, King Charles III.

So, we can clearly see that all the organs of globalism, except perhaps the Bank for International Settlements, have had heavy Rockefeller commitment.

Climate Change, the main tool (for now), is a Rockefeller baby. The Rockefeller Foundations have made more than one thousand grants to climate-related projects and organisations.

In the response to climate change which we see, could the closure of the coal mines which preceded climate hysteria, leaving several centuries of secure energy in the ground, have been done at Rockefeller (Rothschild) behest? There’s a thought. The covering of our landscapes with ugly bird-and-bat munching wind turbines and farmland-destroying solar panels are simply a means to drain our pockets while leaving us under the threat of power cuts and power rationing through smart meters.

Net Zero is an excuse to close down individual freedom through abolishing cheap travel for all, close down livestock and dairy farming and put all food production in the hands of multi-national corporations which will have us consuming bugs and genetically modified, plant-based ersatz food laced with chemicals and mRNA.

The Convid Scam: No, it wasn’t a bat getting it off with a pangolin in a wet market in Wuhan. it wasn’t even a lab leak in Wuhan. It was deliberate. The Sars-Cov-2 virus, if it exists at all, was not a novel virus. There are stories of gain-of-function research pointing to its being a bio-weapon inflicted on the World to reduce the population but, no, it wasn’t that. The bio-weapons are the so-called ‘vaccines’ which people were persuaded through manufactured fear to accept. Oh, and ALL vaccines are toxic in some way or another.

Wasn’t it odd that during the lockdown years nearly all Western heads of government followed the same policies and used the same language? “Build Back Better”; “disinformation, misinformation, malinformation”; “we are your single source of truth”. Was this not a clear sign of their following of orders from above? All of them were in “Lockstep”, another idea emanating from the Rockefeller Foundation.

And then, on 24th February 2022, Convid was blown out of the headlines, forgotten about, by the manufactured war in Ukraine and we all turned our attention to that. Driven by Britain with the USA doing the heavy lifting, the Ukraine war is the Great Game 2.0. It was followed on 7th October 2023 by the Hamas attack from Gaza on Israeli citizens and everything which has happened since is designed to create instability.

Now, we are entertained by the release of the Epstein files the aim of which is to cloak other things. It has all centred on the Andrew, formerly known as Prince, but it involves a much more slithery creep – Peter Mandelson. However much we might revile them, I think both of these men are scapegoats who are there to distract us from the much more incendiary contents of those files, not all of which have been released, by the way, and many of which are still redacted. The US Department of Justice has not made it easy for independent journalists to find the gold within them by simply not providing any sort of indexing, cataloguing or referencing.

There are calls for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor to go to the United States and testify before Congress. That could lead to charges. They haven’t fastened on to Mandelson yet, but they will. Ghislaine Maxwell has refused to answer any more questions, pleading the Fifth Amendment. She values her life, even if it is in prison. King Charles III has said he is ready to assist any police investigations into his brother Andrew, but the real questions should be to Charles himself: Just what did he know about his brother’s activities and for how long?

The King does not look well and there could be a changing of the Guard at the Palace sooner than we anticipate. Prince William is known ‘not to be comfortable with Christianity’ and he is quoted as having said he has plans for change in the Monarchy when he ascends to the Throne. We can all wonder what those changes might be. Meanwhile, Starmer is known to wish to do the bidding of Gordon Brown, who is still meddling with changing the constitution, and abolish the House of Lords. With no hereditary peers, who will hold the King (or state) to account under Magna Carta? The peers are so called because they are peers of the King and he is First Among Equals.

At the same time, we have a new, controversial, woke Archbishop of Canterbury who will be called upon (if she is still the archbishop when it happens) to anoint King William V to the strains of Zadok the Priest. The United Kingdom is constitutionally a Christian country, but we will have a new Monarch who is uncomfortable with that and a woman (heresy) anointing him who is much more Marxist than Christian.

Could it be that it is Prince Williams’s assigned future role to bring the Monarchy to a close? I’m just putting that out there. Certainly, there is much going on right now, and much has gone on in recent decades, to tarnish its image. Is Mr Mountbatten-Windsor a part of a much greater deception designed to lead us towards the abolition of the Monarchy, so clearing the way for a technate – Airstrip One, perhaps? The institution of the Monarchy (but not the person, family and private wealth of the Monarch) has been under Parliament’s control since 1688 but we know, because a Rothschild told us, that international banking and finance cares not which puppet is on the throne of Empire because whoever controls the money, controls the Empire, and they control the money.

We are back where we were with Rockefeller (Rothschild), Kissinger, Schwab, Brzezinski and their various successors who are now in place. Faced with the threats of digital ID, constant surveillance, CBDC, expensive unreliable energy, fake food, controlled weather, fifteen-minute neighbourhoods and never-ending ‘vaccine’ mandates all we can do is say no and refuse to comply. That starts locally at councils – Parish, Town, District and County. That’s where climate ‘crisis’ measures are being implemented and the groundwork for technocracy is being embedded. We need to go to the council meetings, as is our right, face down the councillors and say no.

I haven’t put any links in here deliberately, apart from the one to Tom Armstrong’s article at the beginning. The reason is simple; I didn’t want to sidetrack readers. If you think this is all a bit far-fetched, all I can say is do your own research. Use your own discernment. There is no better place to start than the Freespeechbacklash Library – I’ll link that – because everything which has led to my own “Weltanschauung” is either there or referenced there.

Happy reading, listening and viewing.

---