‘Muslim sympathizers’ that make up 6.5% of the UK will legally define how the other 93.5% of the non-Muslim population should behave towards Muslims
the Islamification of the UK continues
PETER HALLIGAN
From here (h/t : (ZeroHedge)
Revealed: ALL Members Of Government’s ‘Anti-Muslim Hostility’ Group Have ISLAMIST Links – modernity
Are those redefinining the law actually ‘Islamists’.
From Brave AI:
“An Islamist is a person who believes that Islam should determine not only the private sphere but also social and political life, advocating for the implementation of Islamic law (Sharia) as the foundation of the state and society.
While a Muslim is defined by their religious faith and practice, an Islamist is defined by a specific political ideology that seeks to reorder government and society according to their interpretation of Islamic principles, often rejecting the separation of religion and state.
Key characteristics of Islamism include:
- Divine Supremacy: The belief that Islam is not just a personal faith but a comprehensive system that must govern all aspects of life, replacing popular sovereignty with divine authority.
- Rejection of Secularism: A fundamental opposition to the separation of state and religion, as well as to Western guiding principles such as freedom of opinion, press, and artistic freedom.
- Spectrum of Tactics: A broad spectrum of currents exists, including mainstream groups that work within existing state structures, quietist Salafists who focus on preaching, and radical jihadist groups that advocate armed struggle.
- Goal of Re-Islamisation: The ultimate objective is the re-Islamisation of society and the establishment of an Islamic state based on Sharia, though the specific vision of this state varies by group.
In other words – all laws created by man via the democratic and any other process ar invalid an only Sharia law, created by the prophet have ‘standing’.
From Brave AI:
“The UK government’s Working Group on Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia Definition, established in February 2025, is chaired by Dominic Grieve KC, the former Attorney General.
The group comprises five members selected to represent Muslim communities, independent experts, and academics:
- Professor Javed Khan OBE: Managing Director of the think tank EQUI.
- Baroness Shaista Gohir OBE: Chief Executive of Muslim Women’s Network UK.
- Akeela Ahmed MBE: Co-Chair of the British Muslim Network.
- Asha Affi: Independent Consultant.
The group was tasked with creating a non-statutory definition to guide the government and other bodies in understanding and quantifying prejudice against Muslims, with a specific mandate to ensure the definition remains compatible with the right to freedom of speech and expression.
While the initial consultation on the definition closed in July 2025, the government officially adopted a working definition of anti-Muslim hostility in March 2026, which the group informed.
The UK government’s non-statutory working definition of anti-Muslim hostility identifies three core forms of unacceptable prejudice directed at Muslims or those perceived to be Muslim:
- Criminal Acts: Intentionally engaging in, assisting, or encouraging criminal acts—such as violence, vandalism, harassment, or intimidation (physical, verbal, written, or electronic)—targeted at Muslims because of their religion or perception.
- Prejudicial Stereotyping: Treating Muslims as a collective group defined by fixed and negative characteristics with the intention of encouraging hatred against them, regardless of their individual opinions or actions.
- Unlawful Discrimination: Engaging in conduct, including institutional practices and biases, intended to disadvantage Muslims in public and economic life.
The definition explicitly safeguards freedom of speech, ensuring that criticism of religious beliefs, practices, or historical development remains protected, while noting that the term “anti-Muslim hostility” was chosen to focus on conduct and actions rather than beliefs about the religion of Islam itself. This definition, announced in March 2026 by Communities Secretary Steve Reed, is intended as a guidance tool for public authorities and institutions rather than a legally binding statute.
In other words NOTHING must stand in the way of Divine Supremacy, the Rejection of Secularism, and the Goal of Re-Islamisation – not FGM, WIFE BEATING, ARRANGED CHILD MARRIAGES, COUSIN MARRIAGES and so on.
Back to the article from Modernity.news
“The UK Labour government’s new definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” – rebranded from “Islamophobia” – is being shaped by a working group where every single member has links to Islamist organisations.”
It looks like Muslims are well on their way to implementing the supremacy of Sharia law in the UK.
“The details are exposed in the Free Speech Union’s latest investigative briefing which highlights ties between the group members and the Muslim Council of Britain (MCB) and Muslim Engagement and Development (MEND),- groups that governments since 2009 have refused to engage with due to their extreme views.
“One member, Baroness Gohir, tweeted in support of Hamas in 2014. Another stood for the far-left, Islamist-supporting Respect Party.
As a reminder, the Respect Party’s support base was primarily concentrated in British Muslim communities in East London, Birmingham, and Bradford. The party officially deregistered in August 2016.
The Free Speech Union’s latest investigative briefing reveals that ALL FIVE members of the Government’s working group tasked with defining “Islamophobia” — now rebranded as “anti-Muslim hostility” — have troubling links to Islamist organisations.
These include the Muslim Council… https://t.co/MZsgc4amKF
— The Free Speech Union (@SpeechUnion) April 8, 2026
“As the Free Speech Union states: “In a free society, no religion should enjoy greater protection than others — nor be shielded from legitimate criticism and challenge. The FSU adds: “This group was stacked with members already sympathetic to such a definition.” And with the government yet to appoint a new Islamophobia tsar, “there is deep cause for concern.”
Conservative MP Katie Lam put it bluntly in her video response: “The Government’s new ‘anti-Muslim hostility’ definition will make it harder to talk about Islamist extremism, FGM, and the grooming gangs. They’d rather restrict our right to criticise than deal with these problems head-on. It’s putting us all in danger.”
Anti-Free Speech Hostility: The Islamist Links of the Government’s Working Group on Islamophobia
Islamists are insidiously seeking th overthrow of the UK AND THE REPLACEMEN OF ITS LEGAL SYSTEM WIH SHARIA LAW.
Th Labour government – and the Greens/Liberal Democrats are fully on board though the LibDEMS HAVE NO CLUE AS TO WHAT IS ACRUALLY GOING ON.
Please take a (paid or unpaid) subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested.
- You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here:
https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
This article (‘Muslim sympathizers’ that make up 6.5% of the UK will legally define how the other 93.5% of the non-Muslim population should behave towards Muslims) was created and published by Peter Halligan and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Europe On The Verge Of Surrender To Islam
A culture shaped by the Enlightenment cannot be overrun by a medieval culture that refuses to change, and it is up to Europe to save itself.
JANET LEVY
Explaining the decline of the Roman Empire in The Story of Civilization, Will Durant wrote: “A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself within.” The same could become true of the European Union (EU) in the 21st century. Postmodern illusions of a benign and righteous multiculturalism are allowing Islamist ideology—which has no reservations about its supremacist ambitions—to spread its roots with unprecedented virulence.
Consider how a guilt-shame complex fostered by leftist academia in institutions, the media, and the public is eroding the Judeo-Christian ethos. Christmas is no longer Christmas but some silly secular celebration like ‘Winter Journey’ or ‘Destination Beautiful Winter,’ while ‘Merry Christmas’ is being replaced by ‘Happy Winter.’ In the U.S., France, Spain, Germany, and beyond, governments, schools, and media outlets have diminished, canceled, or sanitized Judeo-Christian festivals and done away with Christian symbols, lights, and even traditional songs.
At the same time, Islam is permitted a loud and visible presence. Ramadan celebrations are happening more often at iconic locations and major government buildings. Iftar prayers are increasingly being held in public spaces rather than in mosques. Belgium, for example, organized the longest iftar dinner—2 km long, crossing multiple communities, and serving over 8,000 guests. The adhan, which proclaims there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is His messenger, echoes from loudspeakers, asserting Islamic dominance and rejecting all other religions, to which such accommodations are outright denied.
In the U.K., iftars were even held within cathedrals in Manchester, Bristol, Southwark, Bradford, St. Paul’s, and Coventry. Declaring Allah as the only true God in a place dedicated to practicing Christianity is a direct violation of canon law, but the influence of public opinion and mood has increasingly led churches to permit it- perhaps as a gesture of virtue signaling or out of fear of criticism. No one questions whether the practices of other religions would ever be allowed in a mosque.
Public prayer is not permitted for other religions—even Christianity—in a predominantly Christian continent. Only Islam receives that privilege: in many cities in the U.S. and Europe, traffic is delayed when Muslims perform namaz on the streets. However, Christians are often arrested for proselytizing, preaching, or even praying. Constitutional rights—such as the freedom of belief and opinion—are selectively disregarded: Isabel Vaughan-Spruce was charged twice for quietly standing and praying outside an abortion clinic.
The broad cultural shift across Europe has been toward a questionable and rigid rational-scientific-secular outlook when it comes to all religions other than Islam. The U.K. and other European countries have been going out of their way to accommodate Muslim beliefs. Laws and school guidelines warn against depictions of Mohammed and even of human figures—since Muslims might find them blasphemous. A 32-page booklet issued by the city of Leeds warns educators about Muslim “sensitivities” to art, dance, music, and physical education.
The UK’s new definition of “anti-Muslim hostility” includes a blasphemy law that closely resembles Islamic doctrine. Under this law, legitimate concerns and criticisms about Muslims and their practices could be easily suppressed. Even more concerning, it might also hinder police, public services, and NGOs from addressing issues like grooming gangs, female genital mutilation, and terrorism. Despite these broad protections, the Muslim Council of Britain described the changes as a “diminished version” that did not seek input from its leadership during discussions. This contrasts with the dhimmitude imposed on non-Muslims in Islamic countries.
Coordinated Islamization through peaceful and violent means continues rapidly in Europe because countries are welcoming a community that refuses to integrate. Large-scale migration is followed by the construction of more mosques and madrasas, a rise in sharia courts, and Muslims choosing to follow Islamic law over national laws. Landscapes are noticeably changing, and Muslim neighborhoods, where Islamic dress and dietary codes are enforced, are becoming more common in European cities.
Many Muslim neighborhoods have become no-go zones for law enforcement, despite being hotspots for crime, violence against women, Islamist indoctrination, and terrorism. A 2020 Swedish study found a strong connection between crime and immigration. From 2002 to 2017, immigrants (mostly Muslim) were suspects in 74% of murders, attempted murders, and manslaughter cases, and in 70% of robberies. Since 2018, Sweden, France, Germany, and the U.K. have experienced a rise in bombings, gang shootings, stabbings, beheadings, and assaults on police. Sweden, in particular, has become the rape capital of Europe, while the U.K. refuses to acknowledge the existence of grooming and rape gangs targeting underage girls.
These crimes are rarely prosecuted because Muslims have become a protected class in much of Europe, a status they have gained through large-scale immigration and deliberate pressure. As the Muslim population grows, so do accusations of racism and Islamophobia. Europe, in its obsession with multiculturalism and the idea of a secular state free from any cultural influence, goes above and beyond to accommodate Islamic beliefs and protect Muslims.
A Pew Research Center study estimated the Muslim population in Europe at 4.9%, projected to grow to between 7.4% and 14% by 2025, depending on migration trends and fertility rates, which are generally higher among Muslim immigrants than in native populations. Germany and Sweden could see Muslim populations reach 20–30%, while France, Italy, and Belgium could face similar pressure. Once large Muslim communities are established, they can advocate for laws that support Islamic dominance. Additionally, there is always an unspoken threat that any perceived wrong may lead to retaliatory terrorist attacks.
The stabbing of Theo van Gogh in Amsterdam (2004), the Glasgow airport ramming attack (2007), the stabbing of a British soldier (2014), the shootings at Charlie Hebdo and the Bataclan theater massacre in Paris (both in 2015), the deliberate ramming of a truck into a Christmas market in Berlin (2016), and the beheading of a French teacher (2020)—the list could go on, and such attacks are unlikely to stop, given the rate at which Europe admits Muslims. In February this year, Dutch officials arrested 15 people for spreading ISIS propaganda via TikTok.
That Islamic culture is completely hostile to ideas like women’s freedom, which are taken for granted in Europe, has been shown many times by mass sexual assaults and groping sprees by young Muslim men. After one of the worst such attacks, during New Year’s Eve in Cologne (2015), police and media were accused of covering it up to reduce anti-immigrant sentiment. Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s book Prey links the sharp increase in sexual assaults to Muslim immigration into Europe.
Encouraging Muslim immigration through welfare, free housing, and unemployment benefits makes it unlikely to stop. Those who arrive often do not learn the local language or gain the skills and education needed for integration; instead, they tend to thrive in isolated communities that separate themselves from the local population. The French Institute for Public Opinions found that 46% of foreign-born Muslims and 18% of Muslims born in France support sharia.
As Muslims gain political representation, European culture is likely to decline, largely because governments try to appease Muslims. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni was absolutely right when she stated in 2024 that “Islamic culture and European civilizational values have a compatibility problem.”
A culture shaped by the Enlightenment cannot be overrun by a medieval culture that refuses to change. Using Durant’s words, Europe must prevent its cultural self-destruction caused by Islam taking root. This may be Europe’s last chance to save itself.
Image: Public domain.
This article (Europe On The Verge Of Surrender To Islam) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Janet Levy
Featured image: Laura Dodsworth’s substack
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply