Intro by Watchdog
A major problem any government has in trying to justify vaccine mandates is the fact that the vaccines do not stop you catching or spreading Covid. Indeed, evidence is mounting that the vaxxed actually tend to get MORE sick than the unvaxxed.
This of course bestows upon experimental Cov19 pseudo-vaccines the distinction of being the most useless vaccines in history as well as the most dangerous and renders the whole exercise pointless at least from a health perspective.
But what about an imaginary world where the Cov vaccines actually did what vaccines are supposed to do and stop you catching the disease? In that imaginary but non-existent scenario, again the mandates would be pointless.
Why? Well, the vaxxed would need no protection, having been properly immunised. After all, if you have had the polio jab you don’t walk in terror of rubbing shoulders in night club or cinema with people who haven’t (because, well you’re immune). The only people being protected in that instance of a vaccine that actually works would be the unvaxxed and they have exercised their innate right to balance vax benefits against vax liabilities and decided to “risk” not having the vax’s protection. In so doing, they have not placed the vaccinated at risk IF THE VACCINE WORKS.
But that in turn begs the question “at risk from what exactly?” and when one looks closely, one discovers that this particular bug presents a risk for the vast majority of people that is vanishingly small across all demographics except the very old/frail.
And let’s not forget that several highly workable treatments for this bug exist and have existed all along that are safer than vaccines that have in a few months accrued more adverse reactions and fatalities than all other vaccines in history combined.
And, of course, having caught the alleged bug and gotten over it, one then has an immunity more broad, robust and long lasting than any immunity conferred by a vaccine.
All in all, the vax passports are impossible to justify and make no sense – unless the motive is other than “for your own good” – which of course it is.
Welsh Government can’t provide any evidence for vaccine passport effectiveness
On its site, the party noted that the Welsh government has admitted to not having any empirical evidence that introducing Covid passes helped stem the tide of coronavirus transmission in places of mass gatherings of people.
Naturally, the government response to a question on this subject didn’t put the evaluation of the effectiveness of Covid passes in quite so many words, but the opposition interpreted them to mean just that.
The scheme was launched on October 11, and a month later, the Liberal Democrats are quoting a reply they got to their letter about this issue sent to Health Minister Eluned Morgan by party leader Jane Dodd.
In it, Morgan says that too little time had elapsed since the rollout of Covid passes to be able to assess their effectiveness, but that there was “positive feedback” from stakeholders and users of the passes. And it seems the positive feedback has to do with subjective feelings, rather than, as the Liberal Democrats put it, hard evidence.
Covid pass, Morgan writes, has given those holding it “the confidence to attend venues and events, knowing everyone else is either fully vaccinated or has had a very recent negative test result.”
Commenting on this response, Dodd noted that laws with such a strong impact on people’s civil liberties must be justified by strong evidence. She also noted that her party was not opposed to efforts to curb Covid and associated harm, but insists that action taken to this end “must be proportional and based on an evidence-based strategy that has a clear outcome.”
Dodd went on to cite a leaked UK government document that showed Covid passes might even be harmful in terms of producing more infections as more people are gathering in smaller spaces – possibly under a false sense of security.
And even though Morgan cited positive feedback from “stakeholders,” the businesses affected by Covid passes continue to feel increased burden from the scheme, while not receiving financial aid to help them cope.
Lastly, Dodd urged the government to state a precise date when this policy, which she said was “introduced without sufficient evidence,” will come to an end.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.