BREAKING. What the British People Think About Rape Gangs, Deportations, Legacy Media, Starmer’s ‘Far Right’ Claim, and More

BREAKING. What the British people think about rape gangs, deportations, legacy media, Starmer’s ‘far right’ claim, and more

MATT GOODWIN

I’ve often said on this Substack that while the people who run Western nations would like you to believe that YOU are the fringe minority, in reality THEY are the minority.

On everything from wanting to end mass, uncontrolled immigration to strengthening our broken borders, the views and beliefs that I proudly represent on this platform are much closer to the average voter than what you hear in among the elite class.

Take, for example, the scandal that’s currently rocking Britain —the rape gangs.

As brand new polling by Friderichs Advisory and JL Partners shows, which was shared exclusively on GB News tonight and I can share with you right now, Keir Starmer and his Labour government are utterly out of touch with the British people.

What do I mean?

Well, for a start, and as I pointed out using some other polling last week, the vast majority of British people —73%—say they want what Keir Starmer and his Labour government is so far refusing to give them: a national inquiry into the rape gangs



And this support for an inquiry, furthermore, is also shared by the vast majority of Keir Starmer’s own Labour voters, with nearly three-quarters of them saying they too want an inquiry into how on earth thousands of white working-class girls were raped, assaulted, and harassed by predominantly Pakistani Muslim gangs.

Keir Starmer, in other words, is not only completely out of touch with the country —he’s also completely out of touch with his own voters!


Support Matt’s Work


And it doesn’t stop there.

The British people are also more likely to think the rape gang scandal was a ‘cover-up’ than not, with nearly half of them, 46%, believing the scandal was caused by a cover-up and only 14% disagreeing (the remainder say they neither agree nor disagree).

And, remarkably, more than one in three ethnic minority voters, 38%, share this belief in a widespread cover-up, while three-quarters of them also want to see an inquiry.

But you know what?

Alongside Keir Starmer and the Labour elite, it’s legacy media that really comes out badly in this poll, with the numbers reflecting a collapse of public confidence.

For a start, and as I wrote at the start of this debate about the rape gangs, the British people clearly do not believe that legacy media has done its job.

They are much more likely to agree than disagree that the media ‘did not cover the grooming scandal because of political correctness’.

They can see, in other words, what I wrote about last week —that the media class has too often shied away from this debate because of its fear of being called ‘racist’ and violating pro-immigration, pro-multiculturalism taboos among London elites.

Just 14% of the British public, for example, say they trust the BBC a ‘great deal’ to accurately cover the grooming gangs scandal’, while just 8% of people feel the same way about newspapers, suggesting a widespread reservoir of distrust in legacy media.


Rape gangs: what people REALLY think

Rape gangs: what people REALLY think

·
10 Jan

And there’s also a much deeper divide going on here between the elite class and the people who have to live with the consequences of the decisions made on their behalf.

In contrast to Keir Starmer, Labour MPs, and many other people in the corridors of power, most people in Britain reject outright the idea that covering the rape gangs scandal is damaging to ‘social cohesion’ and ‘race relations’, or is somehow ‘racist’.

Contrary to all those hapless officials in local councils, all those police officers, and all those social workers who for decades avoided the rape gang scandal due to fears it would ‘upset community relations’, most people reject the idea ‘it is damaging to social cohesion and race relations for media outlets to cover the grooming gangs scandal’.

On the contrary, unlike the people who control over national conversation most normal people out there say it doesn’t matter at all if it upsets people because, in their eyes, ‘media outlets need to cover the scandal’.

The people want the truth, in other words, they want justice for those girls —and they are not bothered about who gets insulted or offended along the way.



And nor, for that matter, do most people think that calling for a national inquiry into the rape gangs is somehow “racist” or “jumping on the bandwagon to cause division”.

While this was suggested by Keir Starmer —who has a habit of deriding and and dismissing millions of ordinary people as ‘far right’—only 18% of Brits agree with Starmer’s suggestion that ‘people calling for a national inquiry are racist and jumping on the bandwagon to cause division’.

In sharp contrast, the vast majority, nearly two-thirds, believe that those who are calling for a national inquiry ‘are motivated by getting justice for the victims’.



Somebody, clearly, should tell our prime minister who obviously views these calls for truth and justice as tantamount to “amplifying the far right”.

But this has always been the problem with Starmer, hasn’t it? A total disconnection from the wider population, a total inability to relate to the entirely legitimate views and concerns that are shared by millions of people in this country.


No. It is not "far right" to care about the mass rape of young white children

No. It is not “far right” to care about the mass rape of young white children

8 Jan

Consistently, large majorities of the country, including a plurality of minority ethnic voters, also think ‘the crimes committed by the grooming gangs’ are the bigger issue, not ‘Islamophobia and division caused by covering the grooming gangs’.

What the people are saying to all those social justice warriors and virtue-signalling elites blathering on about “Islamophobia” and “upsetting community relations”, in other words, is “get some perspective” —the real issue here is thousands of young, white, working-class girls being raped and abused by Pakistani Muslim gangs, not protecting the sensibilities of an out-of-touch cultural elite.

And, lastly, what do people think should happen to those perpetrators?

Well, once again, on this issue the British people are consistently tougher than most of the people they have elected to speak on their behalf.

Close to one in three Brits think somebody who is found guilty of child rape as part of a grooming gang should face the death penalty, while nearly half think they should be given a life sentence in prison.

Just 13% of Brits support what most rape gang perpetrators currently get in this country —a few years behind bars before being released, and often being released back into their former communities which is just another injustice for their victims.



The polling also finds widespread public support for the idea that was first promoted right here on this Substack —deporting foreign nationals and dual nationals who are found guilty of child rape as part of a grooming gang.

As I’ve said in several recent speeches, if you rape our kids and hold dual nationality or are not from Britain then you should be thrown out of our country.


We can deport them -so why don't we?

We can deport them -so why don’t we?

22 May 2024

But what do ordinary people think?

Deportation is supported by more than four in five Brits, 81%, and only opposed by 7%, and yet Keir Starmer and Labour MPs have said nothing about this.

Support then rockets even higher to 92% of Reform voters and 87% of Tory voters —it is, in other words, a vote winner.

It’s also common sense. What kind of civilised country lets foreign nationals or dual nationals who rape its children stay in that community? Seriously?



And what about all those public officials who covered up or neglected the rape gangs?

Once again, the British people are definitive —nearly 80% say public officials who covered up or neglected this scandal should face prosecution, a view only 10% oppose.

And exactly two-thirds of Brits think that if public officials did cover up or neglect the rape gangs then they should receive a prison sentence.

In other words, the fact that nobody has gone to prison or lost their job for the rape gangs does not sit comfortably, not comfortably at all, with the British public.

Unlike many of the people in Westminster, unlike many of the people in legacy media, unlike many of the people in the cultural and university class, the vast majority of people in this country are utterly horrified by the rape gang scandal.

They want the truth. They want justice. And they don’t care who they offend along the way. If public officials covered this up then the people want them locked up.

And if foreign and dual nationals are convicted of this horrific crime then the people want them deported, thrown out of the country, while a not insignificant chunk of the population want to see them put to death.

These numbers, these findings speak for themselves.

They not only throw light on the public mood but also just how out of touch Keir Starmer and the Labour government really is on this scandal.

The only question that remains is whether anybody in Number 10 Downing Street is even taking notice —because if they don’t the people will soon have their voice heard.


This article (BREAKING. What the British people think about rape gangs, deportations, legacy media, Starmer’s ‘far right’ claim, and more) was created and published by Matt Goodwin and is republished here under “Fair Use”

*****

RELATED

Former MP Exposes Horror: Children Trafficked, Abused, and Organs Harvested While Elites Protect the Guilty (Video)

The horrifying scandal of grooming gangs in Great Britain, predominantly involving men of Pakistani origin, has reignited public outrage. For years, these gangs operated with impunity in cities across the UK, preying on underage white girls, exploiting, abusing, and destroying countless lives. Authorities, paralyzed by a fear of being labeled racist, turned a blind eye, allowing the systematic abuse to continue unchecked. Now, revelations suggest this scandal is just the tip of the iceberg.

Elon Musk Demands Accountability

Elon Musk, the CEO of X, recently highlighted this appalling issue, calling for a renewed investigation and demanding Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s resignation. Starmer dismissed Musk’s call as a “radical right-wing campaign.” This cavalier attitude highlights a deeper problem: an unwillingness among Britain’s political elite to confront uncomfortable criminal truths about the exploitation festering within their borders.

A Darker, Unspoken Truth

Former British MP Andrew Bridgen has exposed an even more insidious dimension to this crisis. Speaking with journalist Will Coleshill of Resistance GB, Bridgen revealed details of a vast, hidden network involved in the child sex trade—one that reaches deep into the fabric of British society. According to Bridgen, “hundreds and hundreds and hundreds” of individuals are implicated, and children are trafficked into the UK through unregulated small airports.

Bridgen’s allegations are staggering. He claims to have provided the government with the names of individuals, companies laundering money, and locations where children were taken under the guise of attending school. Instead, these children were exploited for pedophilic content and subjected to unimaginable abuse. His evidence was sent to MI5 and the National Crime Agency, yet no action has been taken. “When you see the names, you understand why,” Bridgen stated grimly.

A Network of Atrocity

The scale of this conspiracy is almost unfathomable. According to Bridgen, children are trafficked into the sex trade for about three years before being discarded—worn out by years of abuse. But the horror doesn’t end there. Bridgen alleges that, once these children are no longer “useful,” they are harvested for their organs, a grotesque practice that underscores the depravity of this network.

The former MP also pointed to a disturbing pattern of protection for powerful individuals. Referring to the late MP Greville Janner, whose alleged crimes were buried under layers of political and institutional silence, Bridgen highlighted how the elite shield their own. “There’s something wrong in our parliament when I’m attacking a Labour MP I believe to be a pedophile, and I’m getting flack from my own party,” he said, showcasing the complicity and cowardice within the system.

A Call for Justice

The grooming gang scandal was already a national disgrace, but Bridgen’s revelations demand immediate action. This is not merely about the crimes themselves—it is about a system that prioritizes reputations and political convenience over the lives of innocent children.

For too long, Britain’s political and law enforcement institutions have failed those they are sworn to protect. If the allegations of widespread complicity and cover-ups are true, then this is nothing short of a betrayal of the nation’s most vulnerable. It is not enough to express outrage or demand resignations. Concrete action must be taken to dismantle this network, prosecute those involved, and expose the truth, no matter how uncomfortable or damning it may be.

The question is: will Britain rise to this challenge, or will silence and inaction once again triumph over justice? For the sake of the countless victims, the time for answers is now.


This article (Former MP Exposes Horror: Children Trafficked, Abused, and Organs Harvested While Elites Protect the Guilty (Video)) was created and published by RAIR Foundation and is republished here under “Fair Use”

*****

Muslim Rape Gangs As Religious Warfare

The Muslim rape gangs in the United Kingdom are acts of a religious war against a people whom the perpetrators consider to be conquered.

SARAH CAIN

Behind veneered speeches about “cultural differences” and “cultural incompatibility,” there has been a failure to properly assert the truth that the children who were raped were targeted specifically because they were white and not Muslim. These men were not targeting members of their own community. They were targeting those they believed held dhimmi status (a second-class social position given to non-Muslims in a conquered land). MP Robert Jenrick faced media criticism for merely stating that the mass immigration of alien cultures was the genesis of this catastrophe; but he didn’t go far enough.

Ultimately, these systematic rapes were (and are) acts of war against a people whom they consider to be conquered. These children are the victims of a religious war that they didn’t know they were fighting. If we do not acknowledge this, then we cannot have an honest conversation about immigration policy in the West. It would be preposterous to expect, for example, that mass immigration from Hungary to England would similarly result in the gang rape of British schoolchildren. Our feigned ignorance on this matter represents a political cowardice that betrays these children and condemns the next generation to a similar fate.

Some of it is the subtle racism of low expectations—as if men from Pakistan are too inherently stupid or have innately lower impulse control, so as to be unable to avoid raping children in their downtime. More commonly, though, it is a spineless refusal to admit that Islamic immigration is a danger to the West and that the children of England have been made into victims by an unholy union of the gutless political class and aggressive, criminal, Muslim gangs.

It is a spineless refusal to admit that Islamic immigration is a danger to the West and that the children of England have been made into victims by an unholy union of the gutless political class and aggressive, criminal, Muslim gangs.Tweet This

Those who engaged in this behavior and were prosecuted still live among the British people. A leader of one such grooming gang, Qari Abdul Rauf, was sent to prison for only six years; and after serving two and a half years, he was released in November 2014. He was not deported back to Pakistan because that would “deprive the man of the right to family life,” since he has a wife and five children in the U.K. He continues to live in the town where he committed these acts of barbarism. His story is not unique.

While the deportation of criminals who have served more than 12 months is supposed to be standard, human rights exceptions can be made, and they have become the norm. As a result, people are no longer being deported if their country of origin has poorer health-care access than England, which is most of the world. It is considered inhumane to do so. But the inhumanity of allowing these people to live freely among their victims is never considered.

Keir Starmer’s government is under rightful pressure to conduct a review, this time in Oldham, after the city council requested the aid of the national body on account of the scope of their inquiry. Minister for Safeguarding Jess Phillips denied the request. Starmer’s Labour government has launched a review or task force every two and a half days, on average. Thus, they are not opposed to national reviews, they are specifically opposed to giving these crimes the attention that they deserve. They do not want the numerousness or the depravity of these scandals to see light.

But Oldham is just one more town. As early as 2003, the British National Party (BNP), dismissed as a far-right entity that should therefore be ignored, was working with the parents of victimized children across the country—in Bradford, Sheffield, Leeds, and Hull—places where these stories still remain buried twenty years later. At that time, BNP activists were trying to get law enforcement to pay attention to what was happening and protect those children. They were ignored and accused of racism and propagandizing.

Those same slurs are being used today—the Labour government is engaged in the sullying of anyone who talks about these abuses as racists and provocateurs. But far worse than either of those are the child rape apologists who deny justice to such victims. Moreover, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has a personal reason to distract people away from these horrors.

Starmer ran the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2008–2013, when so many crimes were being institutionally concealed. For American readers: the CPS is basically a nationalized District Attorney’s office. It is the body that prosecutes (or “presses charges”) against individuals for serious crimes. It was the CPS (in tandem with local police) that refused to prosecute thousands of Muslim rapists for fear of “upsetting community relations”; but they arrested minor girls for crimes such as underage drinking—when they consumed the alcohol given to them by their rapists.

Starmer’s labeling and silencing of people now is another manifestation of the very same attitudes that caused these cover-ups. It is the elevation of emotions and platitudes above truth and justice. It not only denies the rights of those victims and stands as a hindrance to their healing, but it also ensures that this chapter in British history will remain open and similar crimes will take place in the future. We get what we allow, so our tolerance for evil will always result in its proliferation.

If this is to stop, as it must, it is imperative that we first acknowledge the religious nature of the crimes and the perpetrators. It is astounding that so many of the self-described Christian social justice advocates are quiet in an area that so desperately needs intervention. It is dutiful and right for the faithful to demand justice from the perpetrators and those who facilitated these heinous crimes. This issue is above a mere political saga, and it cries out to Heaven for vengeance.

[Image: Convicted members of grooming gangs (Source: Yahoo! News)]

Author

  • Sarah Cain, known as The Crusader Gal, is a political and cultural commentator who makes videos about the decline of the West, and she writes Homefront Crusade. She is the author of Failing Foundations: The Pillars of the West Are Nearing Collapse.


This article (Muslim Rape Gangs As Religious Warfare) was created and published by Crisis Magazine and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Sarah Cain

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*