Dr. Kat Lindley, a board-certified family physician based in Texas and member of the World Council for Health Steering Committee, just spoke during the FDA’s June 15 Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting.
The meeting was called to discuss Pfizer-BioNTech’s EUA request for children aged 6 months through 4 years.
Watch Dr. Lindley’s contribution to the meeting:[here]
Good afternoon. I’m Dr. Kat Lindley, member of the Steering Committee of the World Council for Health.
I have no conflicts of interest.
CDC data from February show that about 74.2% of children have had covid already. Over 150 studies show that natural immunity is superior.
The infection fatality rate under 5 years old is 0.1 in 100,000 — or one in a million.
The risk of the shot in the already immune is higher than one in a million. Both Pfizer and Moderna expressly eliminated those that were naturally immune from their studies. They did this to avoid the hyperimmune response and possible death.
Vaccinating the already immune puts them at serious risk for a hyperimmune response. That means you will be voting for some children to have a severe adverse reaction and possibly death if you vaccinate the already immune. This is bad medicine. There is zero reward, only risk.
These vaccines are not medically necessary or clinically indicated.
VAERS show children aged birth to 18 who have been vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna’s vaccines have had severe life-threatening adverse reactions, such as myocarditis, Guillain-Barré Syndrome, seizures and more severe adverse reactions or death.
An article by House and all published May 22, 2022 in American Academy of Pediatrics (safety of c19 vaccinations in US children ages 5-11) shows:
- Myocarditis 2.2 per million cases
- Seizures 7.6 per million cases
I will share two cases seen by my colleagues.
14 yo male double vaccinated with Pfizer vaccine had recent hx of chest pain on exertion, initial echocardiogram and ECG normal, troponin 22,000 increasing to 48,000 in 6 hours. Cardiac MRI with gadolinium showed transmural enhancement consistent with myocarditis.
13 yo female first Pfizer dose last August had 1st seizure within 30 days, got a second vaccine in December had another seizure, had 3rd booster and now has 4-6 seizures a day. She was an active soccer player and a good student, now unable to play sports or attend class in person.
We have no long-term safety data in any of these studies. The risks clearly outweigh the benefits. The VAERS reports 28,312 deaths so far in all age groups. When will we say this is enough?
What is the magic number that will make a cut off and stop pushing these vaccines? Is it 50,000, 100,000, a million.
When do we say we cannot give these to our children? Their recovery rate is over 99.9985%
These are healthy children. And the risk does outweigh the benefits.
These vaccines are not medically necessary or clinically indicated!!
Thank you for your time.
Dr. Katarina Lindley Comments at the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee
Steering Committee member of World Council for Health Dr. Katarina Lindley made the following comments at the FDA Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee.
Good afternoon I’m Dr Kat Lindley, family physician and member of GCS and Steering Committee of the World Council for Health
I have no conflicts of interest.
mRNA technology combined with Lipid nano particle is a key component of the recent Pfizer and Moderna vaccine mass rollout under EUAs. It should be recognized that 18 months on, the mechanism of action, and pharmacodynamics of this mRNA-LNP platform is still only partially understood.
To assume that the platform is intrinsically safe and doesn’t require case by case safety assessment and regulatory scrutiny is in my opinion reckless and runs counter to the very purpose of a drug regulator.
Each component the mRNA is programmed to express, is synonymous to a new chemical entity in the body and should be treated as such with full regulatory scrutiny to test long term safety.
We know already that LNPs and their cargos move great distances from the site of injection into the lymphatic and blood circulation, and have been detected in the spleen, brain, heart tissue, bone marrow, adrenals and ovaries. How can we move forward when pharmacokinetics studies have already shown there is spike production in regional lymph nodes for two months or longer?
Not only should the LNPs not be administered in healthy people, everything you are coding for must be addressed with full scrutiny.
Available bio-distribution and pharmacokinetic studies to date reveal a very different picture of what happens following injection compared with the over-simplistic and predictable picture projected by health authorities and vaccine manufacturers.
Safety signals are now clearly evident yet are being ignored. VAERS data alone, which is significantly underreported, show 1.3 million COVID-19 injection harms with over 28 thousand reported deaths.
Many of us, who have been dealing with the fallout of this speedy rollout of the new technology, have much graver concerns than those reflected by the VAERS data. We are already dealing with a significant increase in complex neurological, endocrine, autoimmune, and cardiac issues. You would have to be a gambler, or something much worse, to argue there is no risk of fertility issues – which could be catastrophic for our future generations?
Has the FDA really learned nothing from the thalidomide, Vioxx and other regulatory disasters of the past?
As a reminder the FDA mission statement states:
“The Food and Drug Administration is responsible for protecting the public health by ensuring the safety, efficacy, and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, and medical devices;
The FDA needs to remember that its responsibilities are ultimately to the people of this great nation. That includes a deep responsibility for children and our future generations. My expectation is that FDA will continue its mission of protecting public’s safety and best interest against any and all harm. Future framework with this new technology is an existential threat to the public health and should not be approved.
Thank you for your time!
Visit People’s Media at Liberty Rising
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.