The pathetic betrayal of our maritime power.
JUPPLANDIA
In the clip above Steve Turley explains recent Russian activity off the coast of the UK, including within UK territorial waters. It gives a good summary of just how toothless the UK now is.
Yesterday however British Defence Secretary John Healey gave a press conference from Downing Street to tell Vladimir Putin that the UK government is very, very angry with him. Apparently we are very angry and very strong and Russia should be afraid of unspecified threats we issue. Adopting a stern expression Healey stated:
“We see you. We see your activity over our cables and our pipelines, and you should know that any attempt to damage them will not be tolerated and will have serious consequences.“
The ‘warning’ cones following British claims of a 30% increase in Russian activity in the North Atlantic probing the British exclusive economic zone (200 miles around the UK) water, together with a specific month long operation tracking three Russian submarines lingering around cables which supply 90% of the UK’s internet traffic.
The ‘We see you Russia!’ Declaration might as well have been ‘and if you continue we will write a strongly worded letter of protest’.
It’s pathetic.
A strong nation doesn’t pull a press conference to say it’s tracked suspicious enemy activity in its waters.
It responds AT THE TIME and forces the activity to stop. Reports do describe some response from both the UK and Norway….but if you are tracking them for a month before they leave, it’s a little hard to say you have scared them off.
Because the truth is we can’t. We have been reducing our Navy in military review after military review for 40 years.
The US has a policy of trying to maintain a Naval strength (not just size, but modernity and spending) that would enable it to defeat any two other navies combined. That policy has been under severe threat from Chinese naval expansion, and from the fact that Chinese naval production capacity now massively outstrips that of the US (they have far more shipbuilding facilities). But the policy was inherited from British naval history, from Britain’s need at the time of Nelson to defeat combined French and Spanish fleets. Following the Napoleonic Wars British policy became that Britain should have more ships than the next two navies combined. 100 years ago we were still doing that. It was our idea as the world’s greatest ever maritime power.
Those days of course are long gone.
But even as late as WWII we were still formidable:
“At the start of World War II, the Royal Navy possessed over 15 battleships and battlecruisers, 7 aircraft carriers, 66 cruisers, 164 destroyers, and 66 submarines. During the conflict, the British Empire built approximately 885 major combatant ships, including 50 capital ships, 229 destroyers, 311 escorts, and 164 submarines, alongside significant numbers of landing ships and tankers.
By the end of the war, the number of capital ships had fluctuated between 13 and 15, with 11 battleships and 1 battlecruiser having served in various capacities. The total naval production for the British Empire and Commonwealth included 19 aircraft carriers, 57 cruisers, 335 destroyers, 875 convoy escorts, and 264 submarines.”
At the height of WWII the Royal Navy commanded some 1,400 ships. Clearly during the largest war ever fought those figures are inflated from where they would sit during peacetime. But look at the largest navies just by number of ships today. In 2024 Britain ranked 31st in that, behind such naval powerhouses as Chile, Nigeria, Colombia and Bolivia.
It was in the Merchant Fleet, in the past, that we showed real depth as well. One third of all merchant shipping in the entire world was still British at the start of WWII. We had the largest trading fleet in the world.
Today our trading fleet is 26th in the world. From 33% of all tonnage, to 0.4% (5% if you count unregistered tonnage owned or part owned by British companies).
It wasn’t WWII bankruptcy that ended the Marchant Fleet. It was loss of manufacturing, loss of infrastructure, loss of steel production, loss of territorial waters, loss of shipbuilding facilities, and the final nail of joining the EEC and conceding fishing of our waters to foreign vessels and sacrificing the favoured trading nation status we had with Commonwealth nations and former colonies outside the EEC/EU.
Nor was it national poverty that explains the decline of our Armed Forces generally and our Navy in particular. It was choice from both Labour and Conservative governments to constantly reduce the size of our forces, to pretend we could always be a junior partner to the US, or more recently, could merge into some sort of combined EU force. Our leaders decided that we could reduce it all to tiny sizes because we would never have to act independently again. It was a lie illustrated by the Falklands War, where thankfully we still retained just enough strength in military equipment, and the Thatcherite strength of purpose to use it, to defend our interests.
That war should have told us that there would be times when we would have to act alone. Instead, what followed was another stupidity-the so-called ‘peace dividend’ of the end of the Cold War and the idea that major threats were now completely a thing of the past. So more spending reviews, and more betrayals of our capacity for independent defence. It’s OK, there’s still NATO. It’s OK, we still have excellent special forces. It’s OK, we can switch to drones instead of manpower. Only every time ‘OK’ meant fewer men of our own ready to fight for us, fewer ships of our own to man, and fewer planes, and fewer tanks, and less and less of everything.
All the while the capacity to replace them was being allowed to disappear as well. The industrial base, the ship building facilities, the dry docks for repairs. We moved to a retail and finance economy and said farewell to steel production and mining, an error for which Conservatives alone are blamed but which was shared by both main parties. We have deliberately crippled our own oil extraction and use in the name of Net Zero, while purchasing oil from Norway who extract it from the same North Sea we refuse to use, and while purchasing solar panels from China that are made using oil and coal powered energy systems. The decline of our shipbuilding and industrial base is part of an overall tale of repeated bad choices that we are still making.
Much more important to spend our money giving Africa foreign aid for them to then demand reparations as well. Much more important to give the Third World housing when they come to Britain illegally. Much more important to sustain obscene levels of generosity to everyone and everything other than ourselves and our own protection.
Here is the current state of the Royal Navy, according to AI summary of what was once the greatest and most feared Navy on the planet:
“As of early 2025, the Royal Navy has approximately 62 commissioned ships and 32,000 to 33,000 personnel, marking a significant decline from its historical peak of over 1,400 ships during World War II.
While the total number of vessels including the Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) reaches around 80 ships, the surface combatant fleet has reached a historic low, with only 14 destroyers and frigates available for immediate deployment. The force currently operates two aircraft carriers and 10 submarines, but faces challenges with availability, as only two of the six Type 45 destroyers were reported as operational at the start of 2024 due to refit schedules.
Key fleet statistics include:
- Total commissioned ships: ~62 (down from 80 in 2023 and 861 in 1945).
- Personnel: Approximately 32,000 active sailors and officers.
- Major surface combatants: 16 units (2 carriers, 6 destroyers, 8 frigates).
- Submarines: 10 nuclear-powered vessels (4 ballistic missile, 6 attack).”
And here is an assessment of how battle ready these reduced forces are:
Both Labour and Conservative governments wasted trillions while letting our Armed Forces and Navy atrophy. Then, when already reduced to pathetic insignificance in terms of our actual capacity to defend ourselves, we still wasted money backing Ukraine in order to pretend that we matter.
That is why the Russians WANT to embarrass us, and that is why they CAN linger around vital sea cables in our waters. If they want to attack such vital assets….what could we do to stop it? Threaten nuclear escalation from the nuclear submarines we can’t actually put to sea?
The current state of our Navy is an utter disgrace. Not in terms of those who serve. I’m sure our sailors are still capable and skilled. But in terms of how few of them there are, and in terms of how woefully inadequate our number of vessels are. And let’s be clear-this, like the failure to deal with illegal immigration and the encouragement of mass migration is a massive betrayal.
The statue of Nelson in Trafalgar Square now looks down on Islamic ceremonies of conquest. At the same time, we now have more admirals in the Royal Navy than operational warships (40 admirals, 19-25 warships).
The first duty of a government is the protection of its people from foreign threats, and from foreign armies and invasion. We have failed this duty. We have failed those who still serve, those who served before them, and the people of these isles today.
With our current conventional forces, we very likely could not stop a seaborne invasion by a determined and serious fleet of one of the current major powers (US, China, Russia, possibly several others). Nor do we use our forces to protect our people from the ad hoc and amateur invasion of the dinghies ferrying third world fighting age men into our country.
All we offer are press conferences where weak men make vague threats from a position of abject humiliation.
This article (Admiral Nelson is Weeping) was created and published by Jupplandia and is republished here under “Fair Use”
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply