The West is at war with foreign invaders, and Western governments are at war with imaginary ‘climate change.’
J.B. SHURK
The global managerial class of bureaucrats, bankers, politicians, corporate heads, and NGOs are committed to fomenting chaos and violence in Western nations. In the name of fighting the imaginary “climate change” hobgoblin, they outlaw inexpensive forms of energy and push us toward a carbon-tracking system that justifies ever more intrusive forms of mass surveillance. In the name of fighting exotic pandemics, they justify mass lockdowns, central bank digital currencies, and “vaccine” passports. By claiming that man-made “climate change” causes new pandemics and by blaming Western industrialized societies for causing “climate change,” the global managerial class insists that Western nations must accept “climate refugees” as part of their rolling atonement for past industrial “sins.”
It’s all excrement-laden propaganda disguised as “science” and “virtue.” Even worse, all these risible lies represent a sustained attack on Western peoples. Consider how malicious these globalists really are: They have spent at least the last half-century scaring children into believing that modern industry is imminently killing the planet. We have been inundated with so much “global warming/cooling/climate change/extreme weather” mass hysteria for so long that we no longer recognize how absolutely evil these enviro-fascist, nut-job propagandists are.
If a stranger came to our homes, absconded with our children, and spent the next fifteen years brainwashing them to believe that the world was coming to an end, we would be horrified. We would call the kidnappers “child abusers” and “monsters.” We would do everything we could to heal the minds of our troubled children. Yet in elementary school classrooms in Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States, and across the European Union, little kids are conditioned to believe in the lie that innovation, productivity, material wealth, and industry are poisons that will kill them all. It’s insane. And it’s even more insane that we let it happen.
The “climate change” con is big business. Crony capitalism works best when authoritarian governments mandate that everybody purchase windmills, solar panels, energy-efficient this, net-zero-modulated that. When politicians and bureaucrats make it prohibitively expensive for small companies to produce anything, Big Business obtains a government-regulated monopoly over entire industrial sectors. Those corporate monopolies kick back a chunk of the loot to the politicians, regulators, and NGOs, and all the money-making conspirators stay rich and happy.
Who loses? The free market loses. When only big corporations can afford to make things, innovation in Europe resembles that of Africa. Ordinary citizens lose because they are effectively blocked from using their brainpower and muscle-power to build and sell new things that generate income, capital, and social mobility. Society loses because the marketplace of ideas turns into a centrally-managed cartel run by a couple of multinational investment houses.
Who wins? The global managerial class wins. All these central managers who are committed to tracking and tracing our every movement and thought depend upon a global system that turns carbon-based human beings who exhale carbon-bonded molecules with each breath into accounting units that must be managed, programmed, and controlled as part of globalism’s unspoken social contract imposed upon citizens for the “privilege” of living. Communists, fascists, and sundry sordid authoritarians of the world have united under the banners of “net-zero” initiatives and “saving the planet” exhortations because “saving the planet” gives them an excuse to monitor, punish, and even eliminate you.
After all, how “selfish” must one person be to believe that his wants and needs are more important than “saving the planet” from destruction? Totalitarianism thrives on fairytales that teach the value of working for “the greater good,” and every one of those fairytales is inherently murderous. For the sake of the “collective,” the “green new deal” fanatics believe that some people must die! They won’t be the ones volunteering to jump into the volcano or be sacrificed on the Mayan temple. They will choose the “nonbelievers” for the coming “net-zero” bloodletting.
And that bloodletting has already begun! How in the world could a sane person justify moving millions of military-aged men from third-world hellholes into advanced Western nations? There is nothing about mass migration that makes sense if the goal is to make host nations stronger. The people being dropped off in the United States and Europe have no skills or education. They do not speak English, French, Swedish, Danish, Polish, Italian, Spanish, or German. They have no interest in learning those languages. They have no interest in assimilation. They prefer to take over historic villages, overwhelm the schools, turn Christian churches into mosques, transform downtown shops into foreign enclaves and black-market hubs, rape the locals, and drain the taxpayer-funded social safety net. Just as parasites feed on weakened hosts until ultimately killing them, invading armies of foreign nationals are devouring enfeebled Western nations until delivering their final death blows.
None of this is “politically correct” to say out loud, of course. Our global managerial class has spent the last thirty years drumming into our brains the nonsensical refrain, “Diversity is our strength!” “Multiculturalism” — the simultaneous existence of many different cultures — is supposed to be superior to any one single culture. How does that make any sense? Is it easier for a general to command troops if all the soldiers speak different languages? Is there less chance of mutiny on a naval vessel if every sailor adheres to different customs? Does a religious temple serve a purpose if all the congregants pray to different gods? Of course not. Without common cultural bonds, human beings rarely work well together.
Why, then, should Western nations be transformed into meccas for multiculturalism? Why in the world would a rational person celebrate the transformation of European and American cities into “no-go zones” where tribes of different peoples fight against each other for power and position? Why are Western political parties demanding mass amnesty for millions of foreigners? How does any of this make any sense unless the intent is to destroy individual Western nations?
And if Western nations are under attack, does it not seem reasonable for Western citizens to prepare to defend themselves? Vice President Vance thinks Westerners should be doing exactly that. After a man from a foreign culture brutally murdered British university student Henry Nowak, Vance condemned authorities’ calculated choice to sacrifice a native son on the altar of forced “diversity”:
Henry Nowak died the same way a civilization dies: abandoned, handcuffed by authorities who neither trusted nor cared for him, and accused of hate crimes he did not commit. His murder is as tragic as it is enraging. He should still be alive today, and he would be if the last few generations of European elites had stood their ground against the politics of self-hatred and the mass invasion of migrants, many of whom despise the West and the people who love it. Henry was far from the first to so needlessly lose his life, and I fear he won’t be the last. Each time a life like his is lost, the proper response — the only response — is righteous anger.
In the week since Nowak’s murderer was convicted, four Afghan migrants are facing prosecution in Bristol for raping a seventeen-year-old girl, there was a mass stabbing in Manchester, and a Sudanese national attempted to behead an Irishman in Belfast. Does the British government still contend that “diversity is our strength”? Of course it does. Rather than blaming foreign nationals for murdering British citizens, the British Establishment is blaming British citizens for noticing that their nation is under attack.
The West is at war with foreign invaders, and Western governments are at war with imaginary “climate change.” New Western leaders must take over before there is no West left.
Image via Free Range Stock.
This article (Western Governments Endanger Western Citizens) was created and published by American Thinker and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author J.B. Shurk
See Related Article Below
When Governments Stop Listening, Societies Start Burning
The litany of gross injustices keeps growing, but the elites care more about how we talk about them – or don’t
PAUL BIRCH
A version of this article appears in The European Conservative
Belfast, Northern Ireland, was engulfed in violence this week, following the alleged ‘attempted beheading’ of a local man by a Sudanese asylum seeker. Vehicles burned, roads were blocked with flaming bins, and terrified families were led from their homes under police protection. These disturbances follow civil disorder in Southampton, England, provoked by the murder of 18-year-old Henry Nowak by Sikh man Vickrum Digwa, and the release of truly scandalous police bodycam footage revealing despicable treatment by the cops of a clearly dying Henry.
But in the modern ‘Yookay’ the political class thinks condemning the riots is enough. And it has learned absolutely nothing. Condemnation is easy. It lets ministers, commentators and officials strike a morally superior pose while side-stepping the public anger, grief and alienation behind these scenes. That is not leadership. It is cowardice.
Once again, Britain, and indeed, wider Europe, are witnessing grimly familiar patterns. A shocking crime sparks public anger and demands for answers. Instead of addressing those fears, the establishment lectures the public, denounces dissent and insists the real scandal is not failed policy but those who question it. People are expected to look at chaos and insecurity and be told that the true danger lies in their reaction. That is why the public no longer believes what it is told.
The alleged attempted murder in Northern Ireland did not happen in a vacuum, and neither did the anger that followed. Across the entire British Isles, people have watched their communities transformed without their consent, their concerns dismissed as prejudice and had their unease shamed into silence. They are told that mass migration is unquestionably good even as they live with pressure on housing, schools and hospitals, weaker social trust and serious – often lethal – crime.
Both the Belfast atrocity and the heart-rending murder of Henry Nowak symbolise that wider sense of abandonment. These are not only personal tragedies, but they present straightforward evidence that those in authority are more concerned with controlling the political meaning of events than confronting their reality.
That is why cases like Henry’s strike such a deep nerve. They crystallise a fear that when ordinary people suffer, powerful institutions respond ideologically rather than humanely; that instead of seeing a gravely injured teenager in need of protection and justice, the police were focused on interpreting the event through the language of race and prejudice. They seem quicker to police language than to protect victims, and keener to manage the narrative than face the truth.
What makes these situations so combustible is not immigration alone. It is the contempt shown towards those who raise concerns about it. Again and again, Europe’s citizenries are told their worries are shameful and that their experience counts for less than the delicate emotions of those people who rarely live with the consequences of the decisions they impose.
For decades, Britain’s working-class communities have been told to accept decisions made above their heads by politicians, civil servants, academics and activists who rarely bear the burden themselves. When residents object to rapid change, they are smeared as backward. When they worry about crime, they are accused of fearmongering. When they speak about a lack of social cohesion, they are branded extremists. Their questions are not answered, and their dissent is not debated in anything like good faith. People can endure much, but not forever, the sense of being treated with disdain in their own country.
The result is a deep crisis of trust. Millions no longer see the political class as merely distant or incompetent, but as actively hostile to their concerns. They watch leaders defend official, progressive narratives rather than confront painful realities, while their own fears are ignored, mocked or censored. Yet trust depends on the belief that supposedly neutral institutions will act fairly, tell the truth and put citizens’ welfare above politics. Once that belief dies, society stands on very dangerous ground.
None of this, of course, excuses the violence. Riots are destructive and self-defeating. They terrify innocent families, damage neighbourhoods and hand any moral advantage to those who would rather condemn disorder than confront its causes. But unrest cannot be understood or prevented if every eruption of anger is dismissed as ignorance, racism or misinformation. That does not solve the problem; it exacerbates it.
The deeper problem is the huge and widening gulf between rulers and ruled. Britain is increasingly governed by a self-loathing elite which seems unable or unwilling to understand the people it leads. It demands tolerance while showing little for dissent; speaks of democracy while ignoring public opinion when it is inconvenient, and pursues migration policies which ordinary working people have repeatedly opposed. Each controversy deepens the belief that one set of rules applies to an almost exclusively monocultural governing class and another to everyone else. Once that belief takes hold, it becomes politically explosive.
The fires in Belfast will die down, the damage will be cleared and the news cycle will move on. But the anger behind those scenes will not disappear just because respectable people have denounced it. It will remain as long as Britain and Europe’s leaders continue to treat public fear and dissent as things to be shut down rather than heard.
Southampton and Belfast are not isolated aberrations. They are warnings. If those warnings are ignored, they will not be the last. And the Establishment cannot say that it hasn’t been warned.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply