CLAIRE BULLIVANT
“In 2003 Keir Starmer won the case that gave illegal migrants access to UK benefits – Twenty years later, we’re living in the chaos he created.”
It began in 2003, a then-unknown human rights lawyer named Keir Starmer stood before the courts and won a ruling that granted illegal migrants access to UK benefits.
It was a legal footnote at the time. Today, it is the constitutional sinkhole swallowing Britain’s borders.
Over two decades later, that same man now occupies No.10 Downing Street, not by revolution, nor even inspiration, but through the grey glide of legalese and managerial drift. A divided right handed him the keys. Prime Minister Starmer: architect of a policy he dare not name, and a chaos he pretends not to see.
Let’s dispense with the euphemisms. What Starmer created in 2003 wasn’t justice. It was judicial sabotage – a backdoor dismantling of the border under the banner of human rights. And now, as Prime Minister, he is the ghostwriter of a national surrender note.
Great British PAC Chairman Ben Habib sums it perfectly saying:
“In 2003, Keir Starmer won the case that gave illegal migrants access to UK benefits. Twenty years later, we’re living in the chaos he created. We’re preparing for wars we may never fight — while thousands illegally cross our borders every month with full legal protection. This isn’t defence. It’s surrender.”
While our armed forces prepare for wars they may never fight, Britain is invaded monthly foreign young men, by traffickers, couriers of despair, and loopholes made law. Each rubber dinghy that kisses our shores arrives cloaked in the very protections Starmer carved into precedent. It is not border control… it is controlled collapse.
And yet, Starmer smiles, speaks in lawyered platitudes, and insists the system is “working.” Of course it is… for everyone EXCEPT Britain.
There is a cruel irony here: a man who once built his career defending those who broke our laws now leads the very nation they break into. Under his reign, national security is abstract, sovereignty is negotiable, and illegal migration is functionally decriminalised.
Starmer didn’t just open the door. He removed it from its hinges and called it “progress.”
This isn’t leadership. It’s legislative vandalism dressed up in a dull navy Lord Alli bought suit. The border crisis didn’t start with Starmer the Prime Minister — it started with Starmer the barrister. And now, twenty years later, we are all living in the legal aftershock of his ambition.
Britain deserves better than a lawyer-in-chief who governs like a courtroom clerk. In a time that demands boldness, we have been saddled with a man whose legacy is a question mark where a border should be.
History will not remember him kindly. Nor should it.
By Claire Bullivant
This article (Starmer’s Law: The 2003 Case He Led That Unravelled Britain) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Claire Bullivant
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Starmer is a member of the (secret?) Fabian Society like much of the cabinet; he leads the Fabian Labour Party. What do you expect?