As this Substack has been exposing for many years now, the entire (childhood) vaccination program is nothing more than a premeditated depopulation program…
If ALL Vaccines Are Unsafe And Ineffective, Then Why Are They Being Foisted on Humanity?
There is not a single vaccine that is safe, effective, or in any way necessary; in fact, all of the major vaccines are actually far worse than the diseases they fraudulently purport to protect against; to wit:
Read full story
…with the Medical Industrial Complex having coined yet another one of their “Safe and Effective” reality inverting coverup terms in Sudden Infant Deaths Syndrome (SIDS), except that prior to the perpetually expanding childhood vaccination schedule there was never in human history any “sudden” infanticide by injection…
Syndrome that is characterized by the sudden death of an infant that is not predicted by medical history and remains unexplained after a thorough forensic autopsy and detailed death scene investigation.
The “thorough” SIDS forensic autopsies are deliberately undermined by the very definition itself, which unsurprisingly results in misclassifications that serve as the ultimate deception; to wit:
SIDS is a completely manufactured term that functions as a bait and switch for the ongoing eugenics program of vaccine-induced infanticide, and just like with the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines,” which have been responsible for the hitherto unprecedented Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS)…
NEW – Doctors seek answers to why healthy young people are dying suddenly and unexpectedly from a mysterious syndrome.
Just like the ultimate control group in the Amish proves that SIDS is a direct function of vaccinations, an interesting case study is cited involving what was once also another excellent control group:
In the 1960s and 1970s, Aborigine infants began to mysteriously die at alarming rates. In some regions of Australia, 1 of every 2 babies succumbed to an unexplained death. Archie Kalokerinos [39], an Australian physician, solved the riddle when he realized the deaths were occurring shortly after the babies were vaccinated. Health officials had recently initiated a mass vaccination campaign to protect Aborigine babies; their deaths corresponded with the vaccination program. Kalokerinos realized that these babies were severely malnourished. Their undeveloped immune systems couldn’t handle the additional stress of vaccination: “Some would die within hours from acute vitamin C deficiency precipitated by the immunization. Others would suffer immunological insults and die later from pneumonia, gastroenteritis, or malnutrition.” Kalokerinos was able to save numerous babies from the same fate by administering small quantities of vitamin C (100 mg per month of age) prior to their vaccines.
Therefore, we may conclude that malnourished babies are obviously at far greater risk of succumbing to childhood vaccines sooner, whereas healthier babies may die after a few weeks, or even months post-vaccination.
Even the very breathing patterns of babies are dramatically altered due to these wholly unnecessary and deadly injections:
When adverse reactions or deaths occur several days or weeks after vaccination, it is difficult to associate them with the vaccine. Yet, the Cotwatch computer printouts showed that increased stress levels in breathing continued for more than 6 weeks after vaccination. According to Scheibner, “babies experience flare-ups of stressed breathing after DPT and oral polio vaccines. These days are critical days.” Although preliminary data by Torch in 1982 showed that two-thirds of SIDS babies had been vaccinated within 21 days prior to death, Scheibner’s data indicated that “the recipients of a vaccine such as DPT and oral polio may react for more than 21 days after the vaccines are administered [50].”
In case anyone required further evidence that these BigPharma murderers are cold-bloodedly engaging in both infanticide and democide on behalf of their globalist partners-in-crime:
In 2011, a European hexavalent vaccine manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) [56], produced a confidential report on SIDS. (The report was made publicly available by the Italian Court.) Sudden deaths that occurred within 20 days after hexavalent vaccination were tabulated. The manufacturer concluded that the number of sudden deaths reported after receipt of its hexavalent vaccine did not exceed the background incidence or expected number of cases. However, despite the manufacturer’s conclusion that its hexavalent vaccine does not increase the risk of sudden death, Table 36 on page 249 of the confidential report shows that 62.7 % of these deaths clustered within 3 days post-vaccination and 89.6 % occurred within 7 days post-vaccination. Perhaps more significantly, 97 % (65 of the 67 reported infant deaths) occurred in the first 10 days post-vaccination while just 3% (2 of the 67 infant deaths) occurred in the next 10 days (Table 4). Additionally, 6 of the 8 sudden deaths in children during their second year of life occurred in the first 3 days post-vaccination.
And the conclusion says it all:
This study found that a substantial proportion of infant deaths and SIDS cases occurred in temporal proximity to vaccine administration. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). Several theories regarding the pathogenic mechanism behind these fatal events have been proposed, including the role of vaccine-induced inflammatory cytokines as neuromodulators in the infant medulla preceding an abnormal response to the accumulation of carbon dioxide; fatal disorganization of respiratory control induced by adjuvants that cross the blood-brain barrier; and biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to multiple vaccines administered concurrently.
At this stage the entire childhood vaccine schedule must be scrapped at once, and a redoubled focus on nutrition and overall health must be instituted not just for babies, but for adults alike.
The sick and twisted irony here is that as nutritional trends are rapidly declining, the vaccine schedules are only increasing such that there is a confluence of pernicious factors contributing to rising disastrous health outcomes. And America as usual leads the way in this mass poisoning peaceful culling, with the surviving children being BigPharma patients for life that are also a drag on society:
In addition to the WHO funding, the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium — funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Gates-backed Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance — provided the models. Members of the research team also receive funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Wellcome Trust and other organizations with financial and political interests in promoting mass vaccination.
The entire vaccine narrative truly is an exercise in sheer evil:
Contrary to repeated claims that vaccines save millions of lives, Rancourt’s analysis of the relationship between vaccine rollouts and infant mortality rates suggests the opposite — that these programs have contributed to increased infant and child mortality.
Rancourt correlated changes in the global infant mortality rate with major vaccine rollouts between 1980-1999 and 1999-2015. During those periods, global infant mortality rates were declining, but the rate of decline slowed after the vaccine rollouts.
The deceleration became more marked in about 1992, when the hepatitis B and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines were introduced, even in low-income countries.
Had the decline in infant mortality continued at the same rate from the period before vaccine rollouts, there would have been 100 million fewer infant deaths. Instead, the rate of decline in mortality slowed precisely when the rollouts happened.
All researchers modeling the benefits of vaccination missed or disregarded this evident temporal correlation, Rancourt said.
The best way to eliminate both SIDS and SADS is to stay the hell away from any and all vaccines, especially the gene altering and VAIDS-inducing Modified mRNA platform. Also, incorporating excellent hygiene, a well-balanced organic diet, and if there is a flu or common cold, then simply administering highly bioavailable nutraceuticals, and truly safe and effective Nobel Prize winning miracle compounds like Ivermectin will result in far better outcomes than partaking in mass vaccine cult bio-suicide rituals.
Baby Dies an Hour After Getting Seven Vaccines—But You Can’t Question the Shots?
MARCO CACERES
Imagine taking your perfectly healthy baby to the pediatrician for a “well-baby visit.” You allow the doctor to give your baby all the scheduled vaccines and, within an hour, your healthy baby is dead. Considering that your baby was administered 7-8 vaccines—one right after the other, you naturally assume the vaccines may have had something to do with your child’s death. The medical staff, however, assures you that the death could not possibly have been caused by the vaccines because they had observed the baby for 20 minutes post-vaccination and there were no apparent problems. Besides, they say, other babies had been given the same vaccines and they did fine.
This story with the questionable medical logic has been repeated many times in the United States and around the world for decades. Most often, they are not publicized, and so the general public assumes such cases are rare. But they’re not so rare, particularly in India where the pentavalent (5 vaccines in one shot) vaccine is given to infants, along with several other vaccines during the first year of life.
The vaccines infants in India routinely receive include the BCG (Bacillus Calmette–Guérin) vaccine; IPV (injectable or “inactivated” polio vaccine); OPV (oral polio vaccine); PCV (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine), and rotavirus vaccine (RVV). The pentavalent vaccine contains one dose each of diphtheria vaccine, pertussis vaccine, tetanus vaccine, hepatitis B (HepB) vaccine, and Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) vaccine.12
Just last week, The Times of India published an article about a 45-day-old baby girl in Rajanna Sircilla, India who was administered the pentavalent, HepB, and IPV shots. Since the HepB vaccine is already in the pentavalent vaccine, the reporter likely meant either the OPV, PCV, or RVV—or a total of seven vaccines. The parents of the child took her to a primary health center to receive the required vaccinations on Feb. 5, 2025.3 According to the article:
After receiving the shots, the parents stayed at the hospital for 30 minutes before returning home. After 30 minutes later, they noticed the baby was unresponsive and rushed her to a private hospital, where she was declared dead.3
The family of the child protested and alleged negligence on the part of the hospital staff as the cause of death. The staff said that they had observed the baby for 20 minutes after she was vaccinated and she appeared fine, and that another baby was vaccinated at about the same time and responded well to the shots. The local medical officer confirmed that the baby’s death was not caused by any complications related to the vaccines but rather by milk aspiration—”a condition where milk enters the lungs instead of the stomach.”3
Deaths of Babies Soon After Vaccination Usually Attributed to Something Else
Death by aspiration following the death of a baby shortly after a series of vaccinations seems to be a common refrain in India. In the case of one-month-old Aradhika Tripath, who died within two hours of being given seven vaccines, including pentavalent, Indian health officials alleged the child may have died from inhaling food or liquid into the trachea and lungs and accused the family of negligence when feeding her.4
In another case reported by The Times of India last September, a six-week-old infant in Chhattisgarh, India died after developing breathing difficulties soon after the baby was administered nine vaccines, including the pentavalent, IPV, OPV, PCV, and RVV shots. The article noted it had been the third case of a baby dying in Chhattisgarh shortly after receiving the vaccinations that week.5
The Vaccine Reaction has reported on at least a dozen cases of babies in India dying within hours after getting the pentavalent and other vaccines at the same time. Obviously, it’s not remotely close to a complete list of such cases in that country where infants die shortly after receiving multiple vaccines. What is interesting is that in none of those cases were the deaths of the children attributed to the vaccinations just given, and there always seems to be a perfunctory rationale for dismissing a possible connection.
Consider the case of a five-month-old baby boy who died on Feb. 12-13, 2020 within hours of receiving the pentavalent vaccine. The medical officer who read a copy of the child’s post-mortem attributed the death to respiratory distress.4567891011121314 The rationale? The medical officer stated:
The same batch of vaccines were given to several hundred children. In the same [public health center], the nurse has given the vaccine to eight other infants. There were no adverse reports.6
The same rationale was reportedly given following the death of a two-and-a-half-month-old baby girl less than nine hours after a pentavalent vaccination…
The health officers said that the other children who were vaccinated did not show any adverse symptoms.15
Even in cases where a baby in India died hours after a receiving the pentavalent vaccine and many other babies given the same vaccine at the same health center developed a fever and became seriously ill, health officials have been reluctant to entertain the possibility of a link to the vaccinations. In 2019, two babies, aged six and eight weeks, died within 24 hours of getting the pentavalent vaccine at a primary health center in Hyderabad. Another 32 children who received the vaccine came down with fever and at least four of them developed “serious complications.” Health officials concluded the deaths and adverse reactions were caused by doctors having given the babies the analgesic opioid drug Tramadol by mistake. In other words, “medical error.”12
Perhaps the most common explanation for Indian babies dying hours after getting half a dozen or more vaccines at one time is, “It was a coincidence.”
While reports abound of many other infant deaths occurring after vaccination in India, health officials in that country continue to express doubt as to whether the deaths are truly attributable to vaccination.One Indian health official noted:
Infant deaths after immunization are usually coincidental. These deaths have some other co-factors linked to them, than vaccination. … Such incidental deaths during vaccination are extremely unfortunate.15
Widespread Reluctance of Health Care Pros in India to Blame Vaccines for Any Sudden Death of a Healthy Child
There have been countless cases in India and around the world of babies and older children dying within hours or days of getting a vaccine or two. The reluctance of doctors or health officials to blame the shot in these cases has been consistent. This reluctance does not appear to be affected by the number of vaccines administered. In India, giving a baby 7-8 vaccines, including the “5-in-1” pentavalent, is considered safe, despite the reports of deaths soon after their administration.
You would think that, at some point, doctors and health officials would intuitively sense that an unknown number of babies and children cannot tolerate multiple vaccines administered simultaneously. But, for the most part, this does not appear to be happening.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) assures parents that “getting multiple vaccines at the same time has been shown to be safe” and that the “scientific data show that getting several vaccines at the same time does not cause any chronic health problems.” This belief is promoted by many doctors and other health care professionals.16
“Theoretically, there’s not a maximum number of vaccines you can get at the same time if you’re willing to have sore arms. You could get four or five together,” said Sten Vermund, MD, PhD, a professor of public health, an infectious disease epidemiologist, and a pediatrician at the Yale School of Public Health in New Haven, Connecticut. “We have no reservations from a medical standpoint. There’s no upper limit to how many you can get at one time,” says Ana Weill, MD, MPH, a researcher and infectious disease specialist with University of Washington Medicine in Seattle.17
Then, of course, there’s my personal favorite from pediatrician Paul Offit, MD, a vaccine developer and patent holder at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia… ”
“A more practical way to determine the diversity of the immune response would be to estimate the number of vaccines to which a child could respond at one time… Infants have the “theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time.”18
With this kind of thinking, it’s no wonder that so many doctors and other health care professionals remain stuck in this “denial at all cost” mindset. After all, if the “experts” believe that giving children dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of vaccines at one time is safe, then giving just a few at a time must certainly be safe. Consequently, any death temporally associated with recently administered vaccines must unquestionably be caused by something else.
If you would like to receive an e-mail notice of the most recent articles published in The Vaccine Reaction each week, click here.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply