We feature this article as it draws attention to an area in need of a thorough string-pull to discover the full truth of the degree to which free speech was suppressed during the pseudopandemic.
As we now know, throughout the so-called pandemic and the consequent release of the pseudovaccines, the government and its officials lied continuously to the British people in various covert ways, including the false “safe and effective” claims, the use of the fraudulent PCR test to bump up “cases”, the Midazolam murders in care homes and so on ad nauseam.
The MSM, of course, colluded in the government’s disinformation campaign.
One can be forgiven then for speculating that whatever officialdom has admitted to via the MSM (see below), the actual facts of the matter are likely to be a whole lot worse. Is what they have admitted to just the PR tip of the iceberg?
And on that subject we present after the article a very insightful look at this particular issue by the excellent Dr John Campbell which is well worth watching.
Secretive Covid disinformation unit worked with security services
Documents submitted to the Covid inquiry and marked “official sensitive” reveal that the “UK intelligence community” has been involved in the Counter-Disinformation Unit (CDU) since it was founded in 2019.
The unit was set up by ministers to tackle disinformation – false information that is deliberately spread – and initially focused on foreign interference in the European elections.
The intelligence community – which includes MI6, MI5 and GCHQ – continued “working closely” with the CDU “where appropriate” during this time, documents show.
The disclosures were made in witness statements by two senior civil servants, and come amid growing concerns that the CDU was monitoring the activities of British citizens during the pandemic.
Earlier this year, The Telegraph revealed that the secretive unit had paid an external AI firm to trawl the web for so-called disinformation – but that the firm’s reports had also included legitimate posts criticising lockdown policies.
They included posts by leading scientists such as Dr Alexandre de Figueiredo, a research fellow at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who opposed a blanket policy of vaccinating all children against Covid.
Documents revealed under data protection laws showed that he was one of several leading researchers and campaigners whose online activities had been collected by the CDU or the AI firm it instructed.
‘UK intelligence community’
There is no suggestion that the UK intelligence agencies were involved in or knew about this practice, or that they should not be involved in any other of the CDU’s activities. The witness statements repeatedly refer to the “UK intelligence community”, but do not specify which or how many of these agencies were involved.
However, the community’s involvement sheds new light on the workings of the CDU – formerly known as the Counter-Disinformation Cell (CDC).
In one of the disclosures to the Covid inquiry, Susannah Storey, director general for digital, technology and telecoms at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, in which the CDU now sits, said that the Government has a “disinformation board” of around 12 people, which includes members from the “UK intelligence community”.
This board is responsible for “senior level governance of counter-disinformation policy and operational action relating to UK audiences”, her 19-page witness statements state.
It was chaired by Sarah Connolly, the director of security and online harms, whom The Telegraph has previously identified as the head of the CDU.
‘Passing information over’
Ms Connolly has not submitted a public statement to the inquiry, but has previously set out to Parliament how one of the main functions of the CDU is “passing information over” to companies such as Facebook and Twitter to “encourage… the swift takedown of posts”.
The other statement to the inquiry was by Sam Lister, a former Times journalist who is now director general of strategy and operations at the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS).
The submissions to the Covid inquiry mark the first time that the Government has publicly acknowledged that the intelligence agencies have been involved in the CDU.
Ms Storey’s statement also sheds new light on the scale of the controversial unit.
As many as 50 staff
The Government has previously refused to disclose the size of the CDU’s operations, on the basis that it would be “prejudicial to the effective conduct of public affairs” but Ms Storey confirmed that during the pandemic, as many as 50 staff were working for the unit.
Between six and 25 of these were “core” staff in the DCMS, which had responsibility for the CDU at that point, while others would be drafted in from elsewhere in government.
“The CDC was virtual and flexible in nature, with DCMS and other departments pulling on their wider resources… as needed.”
A government spokesman said: “The unit operates under ministerial authority and uses publicly available information to tackle the most severe safety, security and disinformation threats, from suggestions that ingesting bleach can cure Covid-19 to Russia’s denial of massacres in Ukraine.
“It does not, and has never, tracked the activity of individuals, and no dossiers exist.”
And here is the briefing from Dr John Campbell
OR WATCH IT HERE
Another website that might interest you (mentioned by Dr Campbell in his briefing)
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.