The following article from National Review gives you an insight into how psycho some elements within our political establishment have become and how dreadful life will become for the rest of us if we allow these subversive loons to go on dramatising their death-wish nuttiness.
Net Zero, an unworkable solution to a misdiagnosed environmental problem and non-existent emergency, provides a specious justification for an effort to crush the nation socially and economically on the part of people who appear to be seriously mentally ill.
For sure as time goes on the nation increasingly appears to have handed its governance to people who are worryingly mental.
From Net Zero to Jail
SOURCE: NATONAL REVIEW
As is obvious by now, net zero is, by definition, coercive. The net-zero world is one of prohibitions, bans, and restrictions. As it evolves, you will not be able to buy the type of car that you might want, or cook with the type of stove you might prefer, or, even, eat more than a sliver of the beef that you once enjoyed.
And so, via the Daily Telegraph, a story from Britain, where the governing center-left Conservative party has been proudly setting an example to the world (as if the world cares) by its determination to shove the U.K. further down the route to net zero:
Property owners who fail to comply with new energy efficiency rules could face prison under government plans that have sparked a backlash from Tory MPs.
Ministers want to grant themselves powers to create new criminal offences and increase civil penalties as part of efforts to hit net zero targets. Under the proposals, people who fall foul of regulations to reduce their energy consumption could face up to a year in prison and fines of up to £15,000.
Tory backbenchers are set to rebel against the plans, which they fear would lead to the criminalisation of homeowners, landlords and businesses.
The proposals are contained in the Government’s controversial Energy Bill, which is set to come before the Commons for the first time when MPs return from their summer break on Tuesday.
It provides for “the creation of criminal offences” where there is “non-compliance with a requirement imposed by or under energy performance regulations”. People could also be prosecuted for “provision of false information” about energy efficiency or the “obstruction of… an enforcement authority”.
The Bill will replace and strengthen the rules on energy performance certificates (EPCs), which were previously based on now repealed EU law.
And strengthen.
Some Brexit supporters believed that leaving the EU would not only free the U.K. from regulation from Brussels, but would allow it to operate its own less oppressive regulatory regime. That’s not how it’s working out.
The Daily Telegraph:
A Government spokesman said: “We have no plans to create new criminal offences, and any suggestion otherwise is untrue.
“Energy certificate legislation originated in EU laws, and our amendments ensure landlords, businesses and tenants are provided with the information they need to make their own decisions on energy efficiency in their buildings.”
Officials suggested the Government required such powers to amend criminal offences that already exist under the current regime.
Ministers are giving themselves broad umbrella powers to redraw and enforce the system before consulting on precisely which changes to make.
Tory MPs have expressed alarm that ministers would be able to create new offences with limited parliamentary scrutiny under the update.
Craig Mackinlay, the head of the Net Zero Scrutiny Group, has tabled an amendment to strip the “open-ended and limitless” powers out of the legislation. He told The Telegraph: “The Bill is festooned with new criminal offences. This is just unholy, frankly, that you could be creating criminal offences
“The ones we’ve found most offensive are where a business owner could face a year in prison for not having the right energy performance certificate or type of building certification.”
Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, a former energy secretary, said the proposed use of statutory instruments to create new offences was unacceptable, adding: “Criminal offences are an exceptional use of the state’s power and therefore require the fullest constitutional scrutiny.
What makes these proposals even worse is the fact that the powers it confers will be available to the ministers of any governing party.
Like many parties of the contemporary center-left, the Tories’ default mode of government is soft authoritarianism, and that (together with their quite remarkable incompetence) has been bad enough. But they face an election no later than January 2025 in which they will not only lose but be crushed.
And awful as the Conservatives have been, the Labour government that follows will be even worse, and even more inclined to turn to coercion. The Tories are now proposing to give them even more of an opportunity to do so.
Geniuses, I tell you.
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply