CP
In an astonishing week that beggars belief, Britain’s immigration system has once again been exposed as a playground for judicial activism, leaving the public bewildered and furious.
From granting visas to the deceased to protecting terrorists in our midst, the nation’s courts seem determined to prioritise dubious claims over the safety and integrity of the UK.
Consider the jaw-dropping case of a Cuban woman granted a visa to join her British boyfriend — despite the unfortunate fact that he had already died. Yes, you read that correctly. While hardworking British families navigate labyrinthine bureaucracy for legitimate visas, this absurdity passed through the system unchallenged.
Then there’s the case of an Albanian man whose deportation was blocked because his young son objected to the taste of chicken nuggets in his homeland. This, apparently, constitutes “undue hardship” in the eyes of our courts. One might ask: when did children’s fast-food preferences become a pillar of British immigration law?
Meanwhile, a Nigerian woman who voluntarily joined a separatist terrorist group has been allowed to stay in the UK. The reasoning? She might face persecution back home for her membership in that same group — despite the fact she only joined to claim asylum. The system, it seems, rewards deception over decency.
Guy is spot on.
This week alone, we have seen:
🇨🇺 A Cuban given a visa to join her boyfriend in the UK despite the fact that he had already died.
🇦🇱 We can’t deport an Albanian as his son doesn’t like their chicken nuggets.
🇳🇬 A Nigerian can stay in the UK because she joined… https://t.co/y1tkbYVhg6— Suella Braverman MP (@SuellaBraverman) February 14, 2025
If that weren’t enough, we’ve witnessed Gazan refugees exploiting a scheme designed for Ukrainians. A judge invoked the sacrosanct Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) — the right to family life — to allow them entry, despite their tenuous connection to any Ukrainian refugee status. The decision sets a dangerous precedent, opening the floodgates to anyone claiming “family ties” without meaningful proof.
And in a final twist of what many are calling “judicial insanity”, a review recently ruled that SAS operatives acted wrongly when they eliminated IRA terrorists. The same terrorists who were plotting carnage on British soil. Our soldiers risk their lives for Queen and country, only to be second-guessed by those who sit safely behind courtroom benches.
What connects these maddening decisions? A judiciary empowered by the Human Rights Act (HRA) and tethered to the ECHR — an outdated, foreign-influenced legal framework that repeatedly hampers Britain’s ability to protect itself.
The Great British PAC, a new political action group led by Ben Habib, has warned that the current system is no longer fit for purpose. They’re preparing an iron-clad Ultimate Repeal Act, spearheaded by Martin Howe KC, Britain’s foremost legal authority in this area to dismantle Labour’s damaging policies, overreach and diktats on Day 1 of the next government. The groundwork is already being laid, ensuring that a future centre-right administration — whether Tory, Reform, or a coalition — can swiftly reverse the damaging policies that have been hampering Britain’s progress.
“We need to reclaim judicial sanity,” said a PAC spokesperson. “The HCA and ECHR have been contorted beyond recognition, undermining our sovereignty and security. We need to take back control.”
Australia and New Zealand have demonstrated that you can uphold human rights without succumbing to international judicial overreach. It’s time for Britain to follow suit. Scrap the HRA. Leave the ECHR. Restore the primacy of Parliament and the will of the British people.
The public has had enough of this farce. It’s time to take back control — before our courts render national borders meaningless and public safety an afterthought.
Join the Great British PAC here.
This article (Outrage as ‘Lefty Activist Judges’ Undermine Britain’s Immigration Laws) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
See Related Article Below
Ruling that declares: Hamas welcome here
JOHN HALE
THE headline in the Daily Telegraph reads: ‘Court gives Gazans right to settle in UK.’ It would have been more appropriate to have said ‘Court writes final UK suicide note.’
The family of six from Gaza who were granted entry used the Ukraine Family Scheme as a vehicle to obtain the right to come to the UK. Their application was initially refused by a lower-tier immigration tribunal because of the obvious issue of it being outside the Ukraine programme’s rules, and also that Parliament decides which countries benefit from any resettlement schemes.
But, of course, the decision was appealed against. An upper tribunal judge overturned the lower court’s decision using the ubiquitous ‘Article 8 right to a family life under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)’ argument.
The judge in question, Hugo Norton-Taylor, demonstrates again the two-tier character of our judiciary. In this case, it is elevating the court above Parliament and indeed the law itself, by putting a concept of ‘human rights’ above the actual rules. He noted that the family were facing a humanitarian crisis as a consequence of the Israeli government’s indiscriminate attempts to eliminate Hamas – a leftist anti-Israel canard espoused by a judge in a court ruling. This is not democracy; it is Leftist Woke demagoguery.
The judge is the son of Richard Norton-Taylor, a former Guardian journalist renowned for his anti-Israel beliefs who last year endorsed a petition calling for Haringey council in north London to ‘stop supporting genocide in Palestine’.
This decision could well accelerate the numbers entering our country with alien cultures that actively seek to alienate ourselves from our own country, by changing the basis of our society, laws, morality and culture.
The Gazan family come from a population that voted in a proscribed terrorist organisation on the ticket of global genocide of Jews and eradication of a democratic country. An overwhelming majority of that population still support Hamas and its actions and goals. Large numbers took part in the October 7 pogrom and subsequent detainment and abuse of hostages. Those actions included the murder and kidnapping of British citizens. These are people we should not be allowing into our country – we have enough problems with the Islamists and Hamas supporters already in our midst.
There are two million Gazans. How many will hope to use this ruling as a precedent to gain entry to the UK? How many will be Hamas operatives? How many will have taken part in October 7? How many of them were involved in the imprisonment and abusing of Israeli hostages?
Sir Keir Starmer, under public scrutiny at PMQs, has said Judge Norton-Taylor made ‘the wrong decision’ and added: ‘It should be Parliament that makes the rules on immigration, it should be the government that makes the policy, that is the principle, and the Home Secretary is already looking at the legal loophole which we need to close in this particular case’.
Starmer refused to answer Kemi Badenoch’s question of whether he will bring forward new legislation or amend his Borders Bill to stop any would-be immigrants from any country in conflict around the world coming into the UK. The Prime Minister obfuscated and deflected, and asserted that Labour were taking control of the immigration issue.
However, Lord Hermer, the Attorney General, has recently stated that this government will abide by all international law and conventions, and will never leave the ECHR: so exactly how Starmer intends to control immigration, when leaving judges the gaping loophole of the ECHR, and its all-encompassing Article 8 get-out-of-jail-free card, for all aspiring immigrants is beyond comprehension. Lots of hot air, waffle and hopes that this will all go away and be forgotten in the ever-churning news cycle.
Our country is out of control, in the hands of madmen and women who have no wisp of common sense, being steered by a dysfunctional moral compass, and with an apparent hatred of Britain and its indigenous working-class citizenry.
We might as well put up a sign on the cliffs of Dover saying ‘Roll up, roll up, Hamas supporters welcome. Come and drive the last Jews out of Britain.’ Our suicide note to the world. Remember: First the Saturday people (the Jews), then the Sunday people (the Christians).
This article (Ruling that declares: Hamas welcome here) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author John Hale
Featured image: podtail.com, the week.com
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply