UK government to provide ‘safe routes for Muslims into the UK
Legalising illegal immigration the Muslim way.
PETER HALLIGAN
“In a 2024 interview with Gabriel Pogrund of The Sunday Times, Mahmood was described as a “devout Muslim”, although she also says she has been labelled an infidel by Pro-Palestine activists.[108] She said, “My faith is the centrepoint of my life and it drives me to public service, it drives me in the way that I live my life and I see my life.”
The ‘(Home?) Secretary of State for the the UK is a devout Muslim who supports the Supremacy of Sharia Law above English common law. Ask her?!?
From Brave AI:
” Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced plans to introduce new safe and legal routes for refugees to enter the UK, aiming to start in the autumn of 2026. These measures are designed to provide humanitarian pathways for genuine refugees while simultaneously tightening restrictions on other immigration claims to “close loopholes” and prevent abuse of the asylum system.
The new immigration bill will establish three primary sponsorship-based routes:
- Community Sponsorship: Allowing voluntary groups, universities, and businesses to sponsor refugees, modeled after Canada’s successful system.
- University Student Scheme: Enabling trusted universities to identify and support refugee students.
- Employer Sponsorship: Permitting employers to sponsor refugees, expected to open by next year.
In addition to opening these routes, the government is implementing stricter controls to manage the asylum system. These include restricting the definition of “family” under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) to immediate family members only, which impacts family reunion rights. The legislation also aims to remove modern slavery protections for foreign nationals who have committed crimes and receive prison sentences, and it seeks to prevent individuals from making late claims if they had the opportunity to do so earlier. Critics argue these restrictions are too draconian and that the current system still lacks sufficient safe avenues for those fleeing persecution, forcing many into dangerous Channel crossings.
TA large number of economic migrants/asylum seekers/refugees are Muslim.
“The UK government deliberately conceals the religious background of such people.
- “Detection Data: Data on detected illegal migrants (those caught or reported) shows a higher proportion from Muslim-majority countries. For instance, data from Jan–Sept 2024 indicated that 73.83% of detected illegal immigrants from known countries originated from Muslim-majority nations (e.g., Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Eritrea, Sudan).
- Limitations: This figure applies only to detected individuals, not the total number of illegal immigrants, as many remain undetected. It also reflects country of origin, not necessarily individual religious practice.
- Scale: Illegal immigration numbers are significantly lower than legal migration. In the year ending March 2026, approximately 39,000 people were classified as illegal immigrants, with the vast majority (38,700) having left the country.
Overall Muslim Population Context
- The total Muslim population in the UK is estimated at 6.5% (2021 Census for England and Wales).
- Projections by Pew Research Institute suggest this could rise to around 16-17% by 2050, driven primarily by higher fertility rates among existing Muslim residents and natural increase, rather than solely by new immigration.
The Muslim Home Secretary is seeking to legalise immigration from Muslim countries thus ‘fixing the problem. NOT!!!
Ou get the picture. There are tens of millions of Muslims who would pre-qualify for asylum in the UK based on the criteria applied by the ECHR.
Please take a (paid or unpaid) subscription or forward this article to those you think might be interested.
You can also donate via Ko-fi – any amount from three dollars upwards. Ko-fi donations here:
https://ko-fi.com/peterhalligan
This article (UK government to provide ‘safe routes for Muslims into the UK) was created and published by Peter Halligan and is republished here under “Fair Use”
See Related Article Below
Shabana Mahmood declares war on the British people
PETE NORTH
Shabana Mahmood has announced a Ukrainian-style sponsorship scheme for households and communities to bring thousands of refugees to the UK from conflict zones around the world. The Home Office states “New safe and legal routes will open for refugees through community sponsorship, refugee study and work routes. Numbers will start small and be controlled, with strict screening and approved sponsors to ensure the system supports genuine refugees while preventing abuse”.
Of course, we know that will not be the case since we learned just recently that vape shops were given permission to sponsor visas.
Nobody should be surprised by this latest announcement. Mahmood alluded to this when she set out her reforms to ILR just recently. It was right there in the fine print. This has always been the intention. They take advice from academics and NGOs who, fundamentally, believe that borders are racist, and are so profoundly stupid, they believe the boat traffic will stop if legal routes are created.
Their “solution” to illegal immigration is to essentially abolish borders – and you’re racist if you oppose them. Behind closed doors, they’re laughing at you because they know if you’re too vocal in your opposition, you’re going right to jail. Whether you realise it or not, they are at war with us.
As though this weren’t bad enough, the Home Office has also confirmed its intention to use MoD sites to house migrants, and once again residents of Linton-on-Ouse face the prospect of having their sleepy little village turned into a flop house for third-worlders. One could be forgiven for thinking the intent is to push Britain over the brink and into a state of civil conflict. Were I an MP, I would be asking the Speaker of the House what security measures are in place to safeguard MPs in the wake of this.
For my part, I think we are beyond the point of no return, and the time for playing nice is over. This puts me in a position where I can no longer condemn rioting and anything that follows. This is a very deliberate act of defiance against the British public and must be met with equal contempt.
My feeling on this is that Tommy Robinson alone has the clout to convene a mass demonstration over this that brings the capital to a standstill. If he doesn’t, it is a misallocation of power and we must write him off as useless. This grave insult cannot go unanswered.
Certainly, as a nearby resident, I will be paying close attention to the campaign to prevent migrants being moved into Linton-on-Ouse and will amplify any protests. This time around I’m not the slightest bit bothered if some shitbird Times “journalist” calls me far right. I know a declaration of war when I see one.
This article (Shabana Mahmood declares war on the British people) was created and published by Pete North and is republished here under “Fair Use”
*
Labour’s latest immigration plan is pure insanity
DAVID SHIPLEY
Last week, almost a thousand more illegal migrants entered the country via small boats. Over 204,000 have arrived since 2018. And of them, 76,352 have broken into Britain since Labour’s election win, just under two years ago. Almost all of them claim asylum. Almost none of them are ever deported. Meanwhile the migrant crime wave rolls on. On Friday, three Afghan men who raped a teenage girl before fleeing the country in the back of a lorry were found guilty.
Our borders are not secure. It would be an act of wilful neglect to introduce another route for those who wish to live here at our expense
On legal migration too, the signs are bleak. The Home Secretary’s long-promised reforms to Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) are yet to be enacted. This means that migrants who came to the country post-Covid as part of the Boriswave are now being granted ILR, entitling them to benefits and housing. They will even be entitled to state pensions under the pensions credit scheme. According to the Home Office’s core estimate, 1.6 million will settle by 2030. Under their ‘high case’ forecast, 2.2 million will. The cost of these people, generally low earners, who will never be net contributors, could be in the hundreds of billions. It is fiscal suicide for Britain.
Our borders are open, and nothing is being done to undo the ruinous harm of recent migration policy. The government’s latest response to this has been appalling. Home Office minister Mike Tapp wrote an article for the Times in which he proposed exempting care workers from the new rules. According to the Home Office those care workers make up around 25 to 30 per cent of those expected to settle in Britain by 2030. At a stroke Tapp’s proposal could cost British taxpayers hundreds of billions.
Meanwhile his boss, the Home Secretary, has announced a new asylum scheme. According to the Home Office ‘the rollout of new, safe and legal routes for refugees will begin in the autumn’. I understand that they are keen the British people understand this system won’t bring asylum seekers to Britain – instead their claims will be approved abroad so they arrive as refugees.
Under this scheme, ‘communities’ will be allowed to ‘sponsor refugees to resettle in their area’. It seems these sponsors will be required to support these new arrivals for the first 12 months after they arrive in the UK. Given the lifetime costs of the average asylum seeker, based on a detailed study from the Netherlands in 2024, are believed to be around £345,000, such a private contribution does nothing to protect the taxpayer. According to reporting by the Times, the scheme will ‘resettle refugees who are fleeing their country due to conflict, famine, drought and other disasters and are referred to the UK by the UNHCR, the UN’s refugee agency’. It will also prioritise those from destabilised, wartorn countries such as Sudan and Eritrea – likely to be among the least economically productive, and in the case of men, with high levels of criminality. Apparently the intent is to ‘offer a route to the UK for migrants who would otherwise make dangerous journeys across Europe and across the Channel in small boats.’
The Home Office’s sales pitch is that this will somehow replace illegal migration, and that it will be better for integration than the current system. The system will ‘operate at a much higher capacity’ than existing sponsorship schemes, and the plan is to also create routes via which universities and employers can sponsor refugees to move here. The Home Office have attempted to reassure the public by stating that they ‘will retain full control over who can act as sponsors’, something which is little comfort given the current skilled worker sponsors list they control includes vape shops, hand car washes and kebab shops.
They also, tellingly, say that this model is ‘something the voluntary sector [by which they mean extremist open borders activists and charities] has long supported’. No doubt they have. Because this is a system which will flood the country with more costly and unwanted people.
Commenting on the policy, Zia Yusuf, Reform’s shadow home secretary said: ‘Unbelievably, Andy Burnham plans to bring thousands more migrants here from countries like Sudan and Eritrea – the very nationalities the illegal boats are full of. This was not in the Labour manifesto. There is no mandate. We are putting Burnham on notice: Reform will reverse this scheme. If he really believes the British people want it, he should put in his manifesto and call a general election. If he fails to do so, when voters do get their say, if they choose a Reform government this illegitimate scheme will be reversed.’
This whole proposal is absolute nonsense. Our borders are not secure. It would be an act of wilful neglect to introduce another route for those who wish to live here at our expense. All that will happen is the most sympathetic cases will secure ‘community sponsorship’ – i.e. limited financial support from their relatives already here, or extremist open borders organisations (many of whom receive their funding from taxpayers), while the less sympathetic cases will continue to cross the Channel, knowing that they face no prospect of ever being deported. Even the promised cap on numbers is no reassurance – inevitably charities and activists will challenge it under Human Rights law, and inevitably our courts will side with them. There will also, inevitably, be crimes committed against well-meaning British people by the migrants they’ve invited into their homes.
A government which was serious about solving Britain’s migration crisis would understand that it has to bring both ILR and the asylum system to an end. They are vastly costly both in economic and social terms, and it is not in our national interest to invite all the world’s poor, troubled and violent to our shores. Instead, the government’s plan is that ‘the rollout of new safe and legal routes will begin in the autumn…ahead of wider reforms to the immigration system’. Accept the extra migrants now, and hope that future reforms will reduce numbers. It’s not a serious, nor patriotic proposal. This week Labour have showed us that they are unwilling to undo the Boriswave. Now they are about to give us a Burnhamwave too.
This article (Labour’s latest immigration plan is pure insanity) was created and published by Spectator and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author David Shipley
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply