Hunter’s Laws of Politics

IAIN HUNTER

hlp1

.
For the last roughly 140 years, one organisation has become steadily more and more influential in the governance of Britain. It is now the power in the land. It matters not which party has won the general election and supposedly won the right to put its manifesto into legislation. Government, guided by the permanent civil service, travels in one direction only – that of greater power and control at the centre. It’s like a yacht tacking across the wind. It might tack port for a while but then it will gybe and begin to tack starboard, apparently going in the opposite direction before another gybe and tacking port once more. All the while it is actually continuing in the same direction.

This organisation gave rise to the Labour Party, founded the London School of Economics and the New Statesman magazine. It is, of course, the Fabian Society. It is quite remarkable how it has managed to do it with a continuous membership of between just six and seven thousand people at any one time. They have power and influence beyond their numbers, aided by many people who may not be members themselves but who, through social and professional contacts, are ‘Fabian adjacent’, often unwittingly. That would even include some Conservatives-in-name-only and some Liberal Democrats.

It was founded in 1884, seven years before Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner got going with their ‘Society of the Elect’ which would quickly span the Atlantic creating an enormously powerful, conspiratorial Anglo-American establishment. Rhodes and Milner soon made contact with the Fabians, and they started to work together for the greater power and wealth of the ‘elite’ class, although how each defined those they regarded as ‘elite’ may have differed a little. Be that as it may, fairly soon control of politics, the press and banking was established along with control of the recording and teaching of history. Nothing that laid a trail back to the doors of this ‘elite’ was to be known by a general populace who were there simply to provide labour and cannon fodder as and when required, kept happy by a constant supply of bread and circuses.

I appreciated none of this prior to 2020. It didn’t occur to me that there was a ‘Uniparty’. I had even been a member of the Conservative Party for about ten years until it became abundantly clear to me that the Party wasn’t interested in my ideas and opinions, just my money and some help with canvassing. Nevertheless, I still believed that we lived in, and were governed by, a ‘Parliamentary Democracy’, whatever those words were supposed to mean. No longer.

I am eternally grateful to ‘them’ for pulling the scamdemic on us. Had ‘they’ not done so, little or none of my continuing re-education would have occurred. There is so much that I have learned, re-learned or re-evaluated, including my Christian faith. The reading I have done, the watching I have done and the listening I have done have all led to a re-worked ‘weltanschauung’ to use that popular German word. So much so that I have been able to formulate a Code of Laws concerning politics through which I now view all public affairs, international and domestic. May I offer you, for what they are worth, Hunter’s Laws of Politics.

Law 1. We Live In and Are Governed by an Oligarchy.

We are governed through the Party System which is controlled by the money power which in turn is owned and controlled by the ‘few’. The political parties themselves are mini oligarchies and that includes Reform UK. Restore Britain (of which I am a member) has made a good start to being more democratic by having bottom-up policy formulation but we cannot be complacent. We need to keep an eye on it.

Law 2The Party System of Government is the World Revolution Controlled by Bankers.

The World Revolution has two arms: Zionism and Marxism. Both developed fully within the Tsarist Russian empire, but they were conceived and were encouraged from within Britain. They were originally tools used to destroy Russia and then exported again. Both are well represented within our Parliament and are now being used to destroy us.

Law 3. No Prime Minister Reaches Office by Popular or Party Acclaim.

Prime Ministers are talent-scouted by the financier ‘elite’ at a young age. Many are groomed for the job but only a few reach the pinnacle. Occasionally one unselected, unvetted politician may get through (Liz Truss?) but he or she will soon be discarded.

Law 4. All Prominent Ambitious Politicians Are Controlled by Blackmail or Bribery. 

This came from the horse’s mouth itself a few decades ago when the former Conservative Senior Whip in the Heath Government of 1970-74, Tim Fortescue, let the cat out of the bag when he described ‘helping’ a member who ‘got into trouble’ with little boys. They are all ‘controlled’ because the whips collect or create kompromat. Nothing has changed.

Law 5. All Politicians are Puppets Who Do Not Represent Their Electors.

They may not be at first but once those among a new intake with drive and talent are identified they will soon be turned into the puppets of the real power brokers – the bankers. They then represent the interest of whosoever pays them or maintains their prominent positions. Whatever they have promised to get elected, they will fail to do (Let’s Get Brexit Done!) or they’ll do the opposite (Take Back Control of Immigration!). They will do what they are told by their paymasters.

Law 6. The Aim of Party Politics is to Keep the People Alarmed.

As famously observed by the American commentator H L Mencken, the people are kept alarmed by all sorts of imaginary hobgoblins (e.g. climate change) so that they will plead to be told what to do and be led to safety by the political establishment to the further enhancement of the power and control of that political establishment.

Law 7. All Politicians are Liars until They Prove Otherwise.

While they cannot lie to the ‘House’ it is quite alright, accepted even, that they can lie to their constituents. See Law 5.

Law 8. Parliament is a Pantomime.

It may not always have been so but with the televising and recording of its proceedings it has become so. It is scripted and performative for the most part with the odd honourable exception.

Law 9. Political Debate is Conducted within an Approved Window.

We all know this to be true. The concept of the ‘Overton’ window is well established now, and its limits are defined by the Left. The struggle to be ‘allowed’ to say certain things is one of the defining characteristics of our times. Rare is the politician who will step outside it.

Law 10. There Are Two Types of Politicians, Signposts and Weathercocks.

Signposts are bold visionaries who articulate a philosophy and lead from the front. Weathercocks wait to see which way the wind blows then try to elbow their way to the front. Both types have their time and place. In a settled civil society, when the ‘Overton’ window is narrow, weathercocks do well. However, in moments of crisis, such as now, signposts are needed.

hlp2
A Signpost
.
hlp3
A Weathercock
.

Law 11. The Concept of Left and Right is a False Dichotomy.

Call them ‘the pitchfork people’ and ‘the torch people’ and then it becomes clear. Both ‘Left and ‘Right’ are set up and controlled by bankers. Therefore, do not look leftwards for your enemy, or to the right. Instead, look up.

Law 12. The Left Side of the False Dichotomy in Law 11 Thinks It Is Real.

This is where one meets the committed, Utopian leftist who just cannot allow that anyone can think differently to himself or herself and be properly human. So convinced are they of their own righteousness and goodness that anyone who disagrees with them must, by definition, be a ‘bad person’. ‘Cancellation’ is therefore justified. Cancellation could easily turn into elimination, and it has already been hinted at by some on the rabid left. It makes them the ‘anti-humans’.

Law 13. The Unobservant, Unthinking Left Are Not Opponents, They are Enemies.

See Law 12.

Law 14. You Cannot Reason with a Committed Leftist.

Don’t even try. Some may stumble upon the truth and look up but the majority are the useful idiots of the financialist class who fund their activities (Antifa, ER, BLM, SWP etc).

Law 15. Never Ascribe to Cock-up or Incompetence That Which Is Adequately Explained by Marxist Malevolence.

It is a fundamental tenet of Marxists that every existing institution should be made as shit as possible and every enduring custom overturned. Hence the Fabian ‘Long March’ through all the institutions of the state and the law. The tortoise has reached its destination and it is now striking hard.

Law 16. Any Puppetician Who Leaves Office Vastly Wealthier than When He or She Entered It or Who Achieves Great Wealth Soon Afterwards, Is Corrupt.

Anthony Charles Lynton Blair springs to mind. So does Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson.

The 33rd President of the United States Harry S Truman said it: “Show me a man that gets rich by being a politician, and I’ll show you a crook.”

Law 17. Party Policy Is Not Developed By Party Members.

Policies are handed down to political parties from the globalists’ supra-national organisations such as the UN (e.g. the UNIPPC, UNESCO) through NGOs and ‘think tanks’ which think nothing original.

Law 18. Politicians Do Not Present Their Constituents Wishes, They Sell Party Policy.

Politicians are not in Parliament to present your views and grievances to those in power. They are there to sell their party’s (or the deep state’s) chosen policies to you and convince you to vote for them.

And finally, perhaps the two most important laws:

Law 19. Never Forget The Five Benn Questions.

Anthony Wedgewood Benn aka Lord Stansgate was not a man whose politics I could support but he was a democrat and a consummate orator, a giant compared to the pygmies now in office (is that racist?). He asked these five questions which we should all ask of all people in elected office:

1. What power have you got?

2. Where did you get it?

3. In whose interests do you exercise it?

4. To whom are you accountable?

5. How do we get rid of you?

 Law 20. Choose Your Language Carefully.

Do not use the language of the Left. By doing so you are engaging on their terms. Weigh every word and decide if that is the word you really want to use. As an example, consider the expressions ‘public expenditure’ and ‘public sector’. The word public is completely inappropriate here because the public has nothing to do with either and has no control over either. Instead, call them ‘state expenditure’ and the ‘state sector’. ‘Public services’ are not public services; they are state employment and pension opportunities.

I offer this to you in the hope that some may find it useful. I should stress that it is a work in progress, and it may require updating or modification as and when something occurs which is not explained by reference to any of these laws.

hlp4

This article (Hunter’s Laws of Politics) was created and published by Free Speech Backlash and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Iain Hunter

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*