CP
From Chagos to Gibraltar: Labour Is Giving Away Britain, Piece by Piece.
In a revelation that should set alarm bells ringing from Westminster to the Rock, Foreign Secretary, David Lammy, has confirmed that the fate of Gibraltar is very much on the negotiating table — and under the Labour government, it’s now a “priority.”
In comments that have sparked outrage among sovereignty hawks and raised eyebrows across Conservative benches, Lammy told Spanish daily El País this week that “a great deal of effort” is being invested to “close the deal” on Gibraltar.
Yes, you read that right… close the deal. A phrase that sounds more like a property handover than the careful stewardship of one of Britain’s most geopolitically sensitive territories.
This comes as the Labour government, with the ink barely dry on its Chagos giveaway this week, now enthusiastically pushes to tie up one of their last dangling threads of the post-Brexit landscape: the future of Gibraltar.
Lammy, fresh from handshakes at the UK-EU summit, admitted to being “personally engaged” in the negotiations, which he says are progressing with the European Commission, Spain’s Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares, and Gibraltar’s Chief Minister Fabian Picardo.
In an astonishing nod to the EU’s ambitions, Lammy’s remarks reflect a broader Labour mission to “reset” relations with Brussels. Translation? Britain bends the knee… again.
Though Lammy did stress that “any agreement must protect Gibraltar’s sovereignty,” his vagueness on red lines is already raising red flags. We’ve heard such promises before, often moments before caving to EU demands. What, exactly, does “sovereignty” mean when negotiations are actively involving Spain, which has made no secret of its long-standing claim to the territory?
The border issue, the key sticking point since Brexit, is being framed by Labour as a technical challenge. But it is anything but. The Rock represents not just strategic control at the mouth of the Mediterranean, but also the principle of self-determination. Gibraltarians voted overwhelmingly to remain British, and have repeatedly rejected any form of shared sovereignty with Spain.
Yet the tone from Lammy suggests a disturbing eagerness to placate Brussels, and Madrid, under the guise of “fluidity at the border” and “broader UK-EU agreements on defence and youth mobility.” Since when was access to schemes like Erasmus worth risking Britain’s control of one of its oldest overseas territories?
In classic Labour fashion, the party of backroom deals and bureaucratic appeasement seems more than happy to horse-trade Britain’s strategic interests for a photo-op with Brussels. The cost, as ever, won’t be borne in Westminster’s wine bars but by the people who actually live on the Rock — and, inevitably, by the British taxpayer.
If the Chagos fiasco is anything to go by, we can expect not only a humiliating concession dressed up as diplomacy, but also a multi-decade financial commitment quietly fastened around the neck of our nation. Who else pays to give things away? This Labour government, apparently.
With no timeline given, and no transparency about the terms, Lammy’s “priority” may soon become another huge problem. One can only hope the people of Gibraltar, and the British public, are paying close attention to what this Labour government is quietly preparing to give away.
This article (Gibraltar on the Brink: Labour’s Secret Talks Pave the Way for Another Imminent Sovereignty Giveaway) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
See Related Article Below
The Submission Fetish as National Policy
Starmer’s government is a Transfer Tyranny staffed by national submissives
JUPPLANDIA
The day after Starmer signed away Chagos to the Mauritians, the Mauritians signed a deal with the Russians.
Starmer has signed the UK up to paying billions so that Russia can spy on the Chagos naval base and exploit all the fisheries and mineral resources he signed away.
While Starmer is also one of the ‘leaders’ most determined to enter a war with Russia and support Ukraine at the risk of nuclear war.
He says the Chagos deal, possibly the most absurd and unnecessary military and strategic blunder in British history (at least the fall of Singapore or similar disasters came during a war, and were not actively pursued and created by the British government)….increases our national security.
Presumably the way signing away our fishing waters to the EU is a huge boost to our fishing industry.
This government essentially exists to take things from the British people and nation and give them to others. All our treaties, all our taxes, all our policies, are now unwanted transfers and thefts from us, whether of our rights or our money, backed by force and oppression.
We give our waters to Europeans and our streets to Muslims, our farms to BlackRock and our arms to Ukraine, our armies to the EU and our bodies to WHO.
It’s a weird and novel kind of Transfer Tyranny, where a government assumes the right to do anything to you, and then hands that right to foreigners.
It’s happy to contradict itself, as with simultaneously going all in against the Russians on one front that has nothing to do with us, while equally handing the Russians a massive geopolitical victory over us through the idiocy of the Chagos deal.
It is happy with this because its main purpose and its sense of self worth is invested entirely in national submission. These are all people who think that Britain is only good when it bows and submits, and it doesn’t really care who that submission is to. Even the belligerence against Russia isn’t on Britain’s behalf, but as an obsequious servant of NATO and Globalism.
This is Gad Saad’s suicidal empathy as national policy. Anything that humiliates, demeans and lessens Britain and the native British is a thing that the Labour government will actively pursue, all while claiming it is something that strengthens us.
It is like a demon is in possession of your body politic, a demon of submissive and perverse lust, whose excited desire lies in being forced and ruled, owned and taken, by others. For the progressive metropolitan, the type of national submissive pervert that Starmer represents, our national position is on our knees or arse up and face down, encouraging our rape.
The likes of Starmer never met an enemy they did not love much more than they have ever loved their own country. The ideology they took on at university and in middle class social circles is the ideology of national humiliation as a moral good. Just as the sexual submissive feels pleasure from degredation and humiliation, the national submissive does too.
And it helps that they get paid for it, of course.
This article (The Submission Fetish as National Policy) was created and published by Jupplandia and is republished here under “Fair Use”
Featured image: iStock
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply