Time to end the biomass scam: Drax, Britain’s largest carbon emitter, received £1bn in subsidies last year – £2.7m a day and more than £100k an hour, which we all pay for
CLAIRE ELLICOTT
Households handed over a record amount of nearly £1bn in public subsidies to Drax last year, the UK’s largest carbon emitter, analysis shows.
The controversial biomass power station receives ‘overly generous’ payments of £2.7million a day and more than £100,000 an hour, energy think tank Ember found.
It has been the UK’s biggest emitter for the past ten years and – despite its subsidies falling from next year – is expected to remain the biggest emitter until at least 2030.
Drax received a record £999million in Government subsidies – paid for through consumer bills – last year despite claims that it uses wood from virgin forests.
Incredibly, the energy is classed as renewable because the wood pellets it uses are from forests where trees are cut down and new trees are planted.
In April 2026, Drax power station entered the final twelve months of high subsidy payments under the current scheme, the think tank said.
From 2027, the subsidy available will be roughly halved to around £460million per year, beginning its phase-out, energy think tank Ember said.
However, the scale of biomass burning all but guarantees Drax will continue to be the UK’s largest emitter until the end of the decade, it added.
‘Nearly £1 billion for woody biomass burning is an astonishing high-water mark for public subsidies – and a problematic one as prices soar,’ report author Frankie Mayo said.
‘While it’s a relief these overly generous payments will halve from 2027, British taxpayers should never have been in this position in the first place.’
The think tank found that public subsidies in 2025 were £130million higher compared with 2024, an increase of 15per cent.
While this was partly due to increased energy generation, it was largely due to the rising value of payments under subsidy schemes.
The increased value means that every household in the country contributed £13 a year to Drax after Energy Secretary Ed Miliband extended the company’s contract.
[…]
Ember also said that the long-term future of the company was in question as Drax had signalled that it may not be able to deliver a promised carbon capture scheme.
Following a probe by Ofgem in 2024, Drax paid £25million for what were described as ‘inadvertent and technical’ breaches of rules about disclosing where its wood came from.
The investigation came after the company was accused of burning wood from unsustainable sources and taking timber from precious rare forests in Canada.
Despite concerns, Mr Miliband announced new taxpayer subsidies for the North Yorkshire plant which generates around five per cent of the UK’s electricity.
The Daily Mail: continue reading
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply