UK government has created a tool for the next pandemic or crisis; it maps the location of vulnerable groups for “targeted support”
RHODA WILSON
Jonathan Engler, a British healthcare entrepreneur, has highlighted a national pandemic response exercise due to be held this Autumn.
In response to a report from the UK Covid Inquiry, “Ministers have also set out plans to better support vulnerable groups – such as the elderly or those receiving care – and train thousands of public servants to handle a range of crises, including pandemics,” a UK government press release about the exercise states.
What caught Engler’s eye in particular was the announcement of a Risk Vulnerability Tool created by the Cabinet Office in collaboration with the Office for National Statistics. By creating a map, the tool is designed to help departments visualise where vulnerable groups of people are located within the UK.
The tool aims to improve understanding of where to find disproportionately impacted groups ahead of and during crises and enable local “targeted support” where it is needed.
What kind of support will these targeted people receive? The same “support” as they received in 2020 such as midazolam?
UK government announces a new exercise to better prepare for the next pandemic and a tool to provide targeted support to vulnerable groups
Yesterday, I published this article, ‘Someone is sponsoring an entire programme dedicated to preparing for future engineered pandemics’, underneath Norman Fenton’s tweet of his FOI request and the University’s response. A reply was left which linked to THIS press release, which I had never seen before:
This contains the usual and expected nonsense about learning lessons from the covid pandemic, better preparedness, resilience, etc. It also announced “the largest ever national response exercise due to be held in the Autumn.”
But what particularly caught my eye was this:
To support this, the Cabinet Office has created a Risk Vulnerability Tool with the Office for National Statistics. The tool creates a map of the UK for different risks that we face, and shows where there are vulnerable groups who might be disproportionately impacted. Vulnerable groups are identified by data including age, disability, or whether someone is receiving care.
Press release: Largest ever national pandemic response exercise to strengthen against future threats, UK Government, 16 January 2025
They use the phrase “targeted support.”
What sort of such support will they receive? There’s plenty of evidence the “vulnerable” were targeted for protocols which ended their lives prematurely, such deaths being classified as “covid deaths”:
They also seem totally unaware of the harrowing testimony from the Scottish Covid Inquiry gathered at Biologyphenom’s Substack, which I recommend everyone follow.
Of course, the idea of “targeted support” is central to “The Great Barrington Declaration” (in which it is called “focussed protection”), a document which few people seem to have actually read, but really ought to; this article was my most-read ever: ‘I have re-read the Great Barrington Declaration – you should too’.
About the Author
Jonathan Engler, MB ChB DipPharmMed LLB, is a British healthcare entrepreneur who is medically and legally qualified. He initially trained in medicine, moving into the pharmaceutical sector where he worked on an international programme for a heart failure drug, designing and analysing clinical trials. He then established a business which became a world leader in using IT to coordinate and automate several clinical trial processes. Having sold that business, Jonathan then retrained as a barrister, where he worked for a few years before moving back into business.
He is a member of the Health Advisory & Recovery Team (“HART Group”) and publishes articles on a Substack page ‘Jonathan’s Substack’ which you can subscribe to and follow HERE.
This article (UK government has created a tool for the next pandemic or crisis; it maps the location of vulnerable groups for “targeted support”) was created and published by The Expose and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Rhoda Wilson
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply