NHS insider: We should train British doctors instead of importing doctors from abroad

A top surgeon lifts the lid on what’s really going on inside the NHS

MATT GOODWIN

Support Our Work

The following guest piece is written by J Meirion Thomas, a retired cancer surgeon.

Some information, when it’s finally revealed, is so unexpectedly shocking that one is left wondering why it was ever concealed in a supposedly democratic country.

The answer is simple. When it comes to some issues in our society, the elite class that is in charge does not want us to know the truth.

Take the National Health Service (NHS), for example, where I spent decades working as a cancer surgeon.

For decades now, it’s been obvious to everybody with half a brain that Britain does not have enough medical school places to train the doctors we desperately need to meet the growing demands of our already collapsing health service.

The Blob, the elite class, have always understood this.

But instead of training larger numbers of our own doctors here in Britain, instead of encouraging and supporting more young British people to enter medical school and benefit from world class training, the people who govern our country did what they always do. They decided it was cheaper and easier to import people from abroad.

Here are just a few astonishing numbers you really need to know. Why? Because they reflect what a total shambles the system has become.

Last year, in 2024, the General Medical Council registered 9,285 doctors who had been trained here in the UK and … get this … 19,279 doctors who trained abroad.

Of the latter, 2,366 qualified in Europe while 16,913 are what’s called ‘International Medical Graduates (IMGs)’, recruited from low-income countries such as India, Pakistan, Egypt and Nigeria.

In fact, if you want to take an even longer-term view then over the last five years some two-thirds of all doctors who registered with the General Medical Council —66% of them—were trained abroad, outside of the UK.

It’s truly shocking, isn’t it?

Why, you might ask, are we relying so heavily on people trained overseas while refusing to train and support young Brits to become doctors?

Well, we know why —money.

As in many other areas of our national life, the ruling class has gone for the easy option, deciding it’s cheaper to import people from overseas.

But that’s not where the scandal ends —far from it.

Let me now also tell you something else that very few other people in the health service will be willing to say, even if many will agree with me in private.

Many of the foreign doctors we are now relying on and importing into the NHS have no experience of British culture or of the National Health Service, raising serious concerns about what is happening and will continue to happen in the years ahead.

There’s already convincing evidence, for example, published in the British Medical Journal, that the examination taken by International Medical Graduates to achieve registration with the General Medical Council is too lenient.

The research suggests that the pass mark for non-UK trained doctors needs to be increased significantly in order for successful candidates to reach equivalence of knowledge and skills with their British graduate counterparts.

This tallies with data published by the General Medical Council, which confirms that doctors trained overseas are three times more likely than their British counterparts to be referred back to the General Medical Council on fitness-to-practice grounds.

The GMC’s solution is to issue new guidance to employers to raise the threshold for referral, thus disguising this incompetence. This amounts to disgraceful practice by the GMC given that one of their central roles, apparently, is to protect patients.

It would be a massive disservice for me to malign all foreign doctors and to tarnish the reputation of those who are just as competent as their British counterparts.

Nevertheless, unlike the United States, Canada and Australia, the simple fact of the matter is that the UK does not have an entrance exam that can discriminate and eliminate those candidates who should not be allowed to practice here.

Meanwhile, every year, thousands of UK-trained doctors who are already registered with the GMC move abroad or leave the profession for pastures new —often moving sideways into finance and the City of London.

So, what I’m describing here is a recipe for disaster.

Nobody in positions of responsibility seem to care so long as there are enough people to fill slots on already-stretched hospital and GP rotas.

Nobody seems to care anymore about the erosion of skill and leadership in the NHS, including its failure to train and support more British students to become doctors.

Poaching doctors from low-income countries, furthermore, also raises serious ethical issues which do not seem to bother our politicians or the General Medical Council.

The UK, for example, is a signatory of the World Health Organisation’s Code of Practice on international recruitment of health workers.

This states that “member states should discourage active recruitment of health professionals from developing countries facing critical shortages of health workers”.

On this basis, the UK is in breach of this convention yet in pursuit of national or personal self-interest, no-one in authority seems to care.

Neither do foreign graduates themselves, who choose to abandon their own people, knowing perfectly well that healthcare in their native country is of an appallingly low standard and where their skills are desperately needed.

Let me ask, does that action chime with compassion and duty of care, which are important personal attributes needed to practice medicine?

Some International Medical Graduates are coming to the UK for postgraduate study, which is a worthy reason, especially if they plan to return home with greater skills.

But GMC data confirm that 70% of IMGs are between 30-49 years of age and are too old to start training in a major hospital speciality. This suggests, in other words, that professional advancement was not the primary reason why they chose to migrate to UK. A better lifestyle, economic security and other reasons are a bigger magnet.

What I’m describing here is not an accident, far from it.

It’s the direct consequence of hapless British politicians putting a cap on medical school places for British students for decades.

During this time, tens of thousands of able and enthusiastic British students with the required A-level grades and aptitude failed to gain entry to medical school.

This is a national disgrace and a bitter blow for all those British students and their parents, who wanted to help their own people and communities but were rejected at least in part because the elite class preferred to import cheaper foreigners.

And then these British students and their families have to watch as thousands of foreign graduates, often less well trained than their British counterparts, flood into the UK to take up the medical jobs those British young people yearn to do.

How is this fair or right?

It’s not as if the UK does not have enough students who want to become doctors. The opposite is true. Why then are there no voices raised in objection?

There can be no parliamentary constituencies in this country without students who have been refused entry to medical school. Why don’t those students, their parents and even schools petition their MPs for change, using this article as evidence?

The moral and ethical case for a major correction has clearly been established. What’s needed now is ongoing, cumulative pressure so this issue can generate the attention it deserves and the British people can get another much needed change of policy.

---

This article (NHS insider: We should train British doctors instead of importing doctors from abroad) was created and published by Matt Goodwin and is republished here under “Fair Use”

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.