They Are Coming for the Land

The Big Land Grab: Unveiling a Sinister Plan to Control Agricultural Land

Richard exposes the alarming strategy to seize agricultural land, manipulate values, and exploit farmers in a calculated scheme orchestrated by powerful entities.

Watch out British Farmers. This is how Starmer’s new best buddies at BlackRock are going to screw you over in 7 steps…”

The Big Land Grab: What Farmers Need to Know

In the ever-evolving world of real estate and agriculture, there’s a growing concern among farmers and agricultural landowners. Increasingly, high-powered investment firms and conglomerates are expanding their reach into agricultural land, posing significant potential impacts on traditional farming practices and land ownership. This article delves into the speculative future of land acquisition, particularly focusing on what might happen as large corporate entities like BlackRock become more involved in the agricultural sector.

The Concept of 15-Minute Cities

Before diving into the specifics of land acquisition, it’s essential to understand the broader context within which these activities are taking place. The idea of 15-minute cities, urban areas designed so that residents can meet most of their needs within a short walk or bike ride from their homes, is increasingly being pushed forward. While this urban planning concept aims to reduce the carbon footprint and increase the quality of life for urban dwellers, it also entails a significant shift in how land is used and who controls it.

Farmers, Be Vigilant: Understanding the Seven-Step Plan

A post circulating on social media outlines a detailed seven-step plan, credited to Daniel Priestley, on how large corporations like BlackRock might systematically acquire agricultural land. Here’s a closer look at each step and its implications.

Step 1: Buying Small Plots at Inflated Prices

The first step involves these corporations buying small plots of agricultural land at prices double the market rate. While this might seem like a win for farmers, who can sell their land at a substantial profit, this is just the beginning of a more extensive strategy.

Step 2: Directives to Energy Companies

These corporations will issue directives to energy companies to aggressively acquire land for carbon capture initiatives. This move not only drives up the demand for agricultural land but also reinforces the narrative of global warming, adding urgency to their acquisitions.

Step 3: Artificial Inflation of Land Prices

By having third parties bid against each other for the land, the value of agricultural properties will be artificially inflated. Initially, this will appear favorable to farmers who see their land value skyrocketing, but this inflation is a double-edged sword.

Step 4: The Tax Trap

As land values increase, the next generation of farmers will find themselves in a tax bind. For example, if a farm initially valued at three million dollars is reassessed at nine million, the heirs may struggle to cover the tax liabilities associated with the new valuation.

Step 5: Offering Financial Relief with Strings Attached

Enter the financial products offered by these corporations, specifically designed to help farmers manage these new tax burdens. However, these products come with significant conditions, requiring farmers to adopt specific practices and use particular products, essentially tying them to the corporation.

Step 6: Auction Acquisitions

When farmers, burdened by these conditions and unable to meet their debt obligations, are forced to sell, these corporations will avoid buying land at auctions. Instead, they have backdoor arrangements to acquire the properties at prices that cover the debt and other outstanding fees.

Step 7: Consolidation and Corporate Farming

Finally, once these farms are acquired, they are consolidated into larger operations staffed by low-cost, often immigrant, labor under government programs. This consolidation makes the farms highly profitable but also renders small family farms unable to compete.

The Role of Government and Public Funds

One critical aspect of this plan involves government funding. While it seems like the government is financially supporting these initiatives, it is essential to recognize that governments do not generate money independently. Therefore, the funds used in these schemes come from taxpayers, adding another layer of complexity and concern.

What Can Farmers Do?

Given these potential developments, farmers and landowners must stay informed and consider their options carefully. Here are a few strategies to consider:

Evaluate Offers Critically

When approached with offers that seem too good to be true, it’s essential to critically evaluate the long-term implications. High cash offers for land might provide immediate financial relief but consider the future generations and the sustainability of your farming operations.

Understand Financial Products

If you are ever in a position where you need to consider financial relief products, thoroughly understand the terms and conditions. Consulting with a financial advisor who understands agricultural economics can help you navigate these complex decisions.

Engage in Community Discussions

Being part of informed community discussions can provide insights and collective strategies to deal with these issues. Forums such as the Vobes Forum mentioned in the transcript can be valuable resources for sharing information and discussing ideas in a positive and supportive environment.

Advocate for Fair Policies

Farmers can also engage in advocacy for fair land use policies that protect family farms and promote sustainable agricultural practices. Working with local and national agricultural organizations can amplify your voice in these critical matters.

Ethical and Environmental Considerations

The drive to acquire agricultural land isn’t solely a financial issue; it has significant ethical and environmental implications. The practices and technologies mandated by corporate financial products might prioritize profit over sustainable and ethical farming practices.

The Myth of Global Warming and Carbon Capture

Skepticism exists around the narrative of global warming and the efficacy of carbon capture methods promoted by large corporations. It’s crucial to scrutinize whether these methods genuinely contribute to environmental sustainability or primarily serve the financial interests of these corporations.

Future Outlook

Looking ahead, it’s likely that the trends described will continue to evolve. Technological advancements in agriculture, changes in government policies, and shifts in global economic conditions will all play a role in how these land acquisition strategies unfold.

Conclusion

The future of agricultural land ownership and farming practices is at a crossroads. The strategies employed by large corporations to acquire land present obstacles for traditional farmers. By staying informed, critically evaluating offers, engaging in community discussions, and advocating for fair policies, farmers can navigate these changes while maintaining the integrity and sustainability of their operations.

As the landscape continues to change, it’s essential for farmers to be proactive, not only in responding to immediate threats but also in planning for a future where their livelihood and way of life can thrive amidst corporate pressures. The onus is on us to be vigilant, to question, and to act in the best interests of our communities.

WATCH:

They are coming for the land RICHARD VOBES

Summary provided by AI

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*