Help defeat Labour’s rigged ‘Islamophobia’ consultation
CP
MP Nick Timothy is campaigning to stop Britain’s new Islamic blasphemy laws, and he needs your help.
It takes just a few minutes to use his template and respond to the rigged consultation.
Mr Timothy explains: “Angry mobs of people threaten violence against those who criticise their ideas and beliefs. Some have been forced into hiding, fearing for their lives, after simply expressing their opinion. Our public institutions have submitted to intimidation. The police, prosecutors and courts now use the Public Order Act 1986 to convict people who criticise Islam.
“And now Labour plan a new definition of “Islamophobia”, which will kill our free speech and embolden extremists. Even worse, their “Islamophobia” consultation is rigged. The Government has sent it to handpicked organisations to get the results it wants. Ministers even refuse to say who was invited to take part.
“So I have produced a suggested response to the consultation. If you agree with me that we need to fight back, please use my suggestions — or anything else you think — for the answers. It should take no more than three minutes.
“These processes are designed deliberately to be opaque so publicly-funded activists can dominate the debate at the expense of taxpayers like you.So please do lend your support.
“You can find my suggestions below. And you can respond to the consultation here. It is vital that moderate, mainstream voices like yours are heard.
“If the format is difficult for you, you can email [email protected] to ask for an alternative response form.
“Thank you for your support. Nick.”
Suggested answers to consultation below
1. Are you responding on behalf of an organisation or as an individual?
[answer as appropriate]
2. Which age bracket do you belong to?
[answer as appropriate]
3. Please state your sex.
[answer as appropriate]
4. Please state your ethnic group.
[answer as appropriate]
5. If you would be content for the working group to potentially contact you about any of your answers as part of their work on a definition of Islamophobia/anti-Muslim hatred, please leave your email address below.
[answer as appropriate]
6. When referring to discrimination, prejudice, bigotry, hatred or violence directed at Muslims, which term do you think should be used? For instance, ‘Islamophobia’, ‘anti-Muslim hatred’, ‘anti-Muslim racism’, ‘anti-Muslim prejudice’, ‘Muslimophobia’ etc.
“Anti-Muslim hatred”, as defined in existing law and jurisprudence.
7. Please tell us your reason for suggesting this term
“Islamophobia” elides the protection of individuals from hatred with the protection of ideas from scrutiny. So it is unacceptable in principle.
Pressure to protect Islam and Islamism from criticism – through the campaign for an “Islamophobia” definition, the misuse of the Public Order Act 1986 against critics of Islam, threats of violence, and the submission of our institutions – corrode our freedom of expression.
In a free and pluralistic society, we must be free to criticise ideas. There are laws to protect people; we cannot have laws that protect ideas from scrutiny.
8. Do you think the UK Government should adopt a definition of Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia? (any definition would be non-statutory)
No.
9. Please could you tell us more about why you think that?
Campaigners for a definition want to pressure Muslims with moderate views about women, minorities and our way of life, and non-Muslims concerned about our national identity and freedom of expression.
A definition, prohibiting criticism of people not based on what they immutably are but what they choose to believe, would allow thought and speech to be policed.
Campaigners want to prevent legitimate debate about Islam in the West on everything from animal rights to same-sex marriage. No religion, Islam included, is above criticism, debate, satire, and scrutiny.
10. Do you think Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia is also a form of racism?
No.
11. Please could you say more about why you think that?
Muslims are not a racial group. It is racist to judge a black man because of what he inescapably is; it cannot be racist to judge somebody because of what they choose to believe. Islam is a body of ideas, and ideas are not above the law or debate. There is not even a single body of ideas about which all Muslims agree. There are many differences within Islam.
We already have laws to stop discrimination. No ideas or beliefs should be protected from criticism or mockery. But our public conversation about Islam has been limited through a mixture of self-censorship and more official restrictions, such as the misuse of the Public Order Act to stop criticism of Islam and protest. These restrictions are motivated by fear of a violent response to by those who are offended by free expression. A formal definition of Islamophobia would effectively enshrine a one-religion blasphemy law and provide special protection for Islam and its adherents.
12. Should any of the aspects below feature in a definition of Anti-Muslim Hatred/Islamophobia? Please tick all that apply.
None ticked
13. If you wish to, please can you give an example(s) of anti-Muslim hatred/Islamophobia that you have witnessed, experienced or read about over the last two years? Please refrain from disclosing personal information about other people involved in these examples – such as their name, address.
“Islamophobia” is alleged to stifle debate. After Parliament changed its procedures, fearing violence against MPs, Suella Braverman said “the Islamists, extremists and anti-Semites are in charge now.” The MCB called her an “Islamophobe”.
When Lord Austin tweeted a joke about Ben and Jerry’s ice cream, depicting Hamas tunnels, Labour Muslim Network called it “Islamophobia”. A tweet about UNRWA caused such a backlash he resigned as chair of a housing association.
When Nick Timothy questioned the concept of “Islamophobia”, Sayeeda Warsi said it showed his party should be investigated for “Islamophobia”.
Sir John Jenkins, reviewer of the Muslim Brotherhood in Britain, says MEND, a campaign group accused of promoting extremism, has “exerted an important intellectual influence” on the definition. The APPG report suggested its purpose is to protect Islam from criticism.
The influence of extremists, and those linked to them, should be considered during this consultation.
I’m campaigning to stop Britain’s Islamic blasphemy laws.
Here the Muslim Council of Britain – shunned by government – tells supporters to reply to the rigged Islamophobia consultation.
They were asked to take part. You were excluded. Find out how to say no in the next tweet. https://t.co/qmgFOio1fM
— Nick Timothy MP (@NJ_Timothy) July 3, 2025
This article (Help defeat Labour’s rigged ‘Islamophobia’ consultation) was created and published by Conservative Post and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author CP
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply