JOHN HALE

HAS THIS country ever suffered such a cold-hearted, calculating, dishonest Prime Minister? And are we experiencing a government, under the iron rule of Two-Tier Keir, that will become impossible to remove?

The seemingly bland Sir Keir Starmer is fast emerging as one of those most dangerous of people – a silent but uncompromising ideologue.Few have questioned his past, but we should. Why did he embark on a trip to a work camp in Soviet Czechoslovakia in 1986, at the height of the Cold War? Here are Comrade Keir’s details from the Czechoslovakian secret police archives. What or who motivated him? On what basis did he qualify to be secretary of the communist Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers for 20 years until he was appointed as DPP? Read their stand on what they call ‘the recent far right insurrectionary activities‘ following the Southport murders to see Starmer’s joined-up thinking with his previous UK communist attachment. Then there is his curious obsession with ending the death penalty worldwide, detailed by Laura Perrins on Tuesday.

Sir Keir has risen to the top of the Labour hierarchy through a deftly camouflaged insincerity and crafted dullness – no one offended, no one an enemy. He dislodged the noisy old-school communists such as Corbyn who were calling too much attention to their hard-left proclivities and made people think he was centre left. Yet under scrutiny his path to victory looks to be one of carefully hidden but even more tyrannical purpose of the ‘true believer’; his position the culmination of his own ‘human rights’ march through the institutions.

He won the election thanks to an almost universal disillusionment with the Tories, but also thanks to a gamut of barefaced lies – to farmers, business owners, students, pensioners, WASPI women, and the whole white- and blue-collar working population, all the while conveying a stodgily safe persona to the middle classes.

Along with Starmer came a majority cohort of eager socialist MPs, happily endorsing his ruination of Britain and destruction of freedoms. Never have so many empty-headed nodding bean-counters filled the Chamber, genuflecting to his every word, enabling him to implement his Socialist serfdom ‘human rights for everyone else’ multicultural dream, whatever the cost.

Despite the economic downturn and chaos brought upon Britain in just six months of his tenure, the outing of his lies, hypocrisy and greed followed by revelations of Labour involvement in and Starmer’s obfuscation over Pakistani rape gang activities and, last but not least, his blatant lying and cover-up of Axel Rudakubana’s extremist and violent past, amazingly over a quarter of the population still support him and Labour.

There can be little doubt that under the bland exterior Starmer is ruthless and implacable. A country traumatised by vile rape gang revelations and the even more terrifying Southport murder trial facts, needed a leader able to empathise with people’s fear and horror. But instead of being truthful and reassuring the families of the victims this would never be allowed to happen again, he attacked, demonised and imprisoned the justifiably outraged, blaming them, not the perps nor the government multicultural policy behind it, and now that their outrage is vindicated he lays the blame everywhere except at his own front door, the ticking metronome of the true believer almost audible in his head: tick tock, tick tock, keeping a steady, robotic cadence as he delivers in monotone whatever lies he is propagating at the time to the great unwashed whom he disdains.

The ghost of Stalin has one hand up his back and Davos Man has the other as he projects the casual, callous indifference of the anti-human virus they both share, visible in his treatment of OAPs, farmers, rape-gang victims, the victims of the Southport demon and their relatives alike, in fact to all those with concerns about the country’s direction of travel, on whom his two-tier justice relentlessly falls.

Will the 4,000 pensioners that he previously assured Parliament would die if the winter fuel allowance was withdrawn draw warmth from his assertion that they are doing their bit to fix the NHS through their sacrifice?

Will thousands of farming families feel their lost pastures and herds are better off under the ownership of BlackRock or other voracious conglomerates?

Will the thousands of raped and tortured under-age girls be happy their cases are not going to become public knowledge because the vast majority of perpetrators, enablers and politicians covering up these crimes will never be called to face justice, while ever more fighting- and raping-age illegal immigrants are welcomed into the country and housed and fed in these communities?

Will the parents of the Southport victims ever have the opportunity to look Starmer in the eye and ask him why he covered up the facts of the case or why, after he had hastily laid flowers in the town, did he rush off to give assurances of safety to the Iman and congregants of the local mosque?

Predictably he refused the full public inquiry needed into the rape gangs in favour of toothless local inquiries, run by the very people who have brushed their local scandals, culpability and criminality under the carpet to date.

Will the public inquiry he has called into the Southport terror prove any better or does it reflect a ruthless confidence that it can steered from the start into making recommendations to suit his ‘true believer’ purposes? Almost undoubtedly.

He seems unperturbed by criticism, impervious to his plummeting popularity – Guido reported a new low yesterday – but doubles down instead. The latest extension of hate crime destines all those who don’t wind in our necks and stay silent on the issues that most concern us to be targets of Starmer’s swift justice, with speedy trials and excessive sentences.

British white working classes and any citizens who support them are to be disdained and marginalised. If that means trampling over our children’s safety to protect his freedom-killing, dehumanising ideology and his own power base, so be it.

This is the brutal moral-free zone that our PM inhabits, leaving me with one question that should concern us all.

By the time we get to 2029 and the next General Election, will he have gerrymandered the democratic landscape and corrupted the legal process to such an extent that it’s nigh on impossible to remove him?

---

This article (Behind that bland mask, Starmer is a ruthless tyrant) was created and published by Conservative Woman and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author John Hale

The UK government is normalising tyranny

Sir Chris Whitty has admitted at the UK Covid Inquiry that the decision to make Covid vaccines mandatory was “100% political.”  His admission contradicts the government’s previous claim of “following the science.”

This political decision resulted in no informed consent, care home workers being fired for refusing vaccination and proposals for “vaccine passports” being considered. 

That the revelations through the Inquiry are slow is by design, Jamie Jessop says,  because the slow pace of the Covid Inquiry allows the state to shift the Overton Window and normalise tyranny, making it seem acceptable to violate human rights and the Nuremberg Code for the “greater good.”

Covid is not the only tool the Government is using to normalise tyranny. The government is expanding its efforts to use the judicial system to target its political and ideological opponents using counter-terrorism legislation.  

The UK Home Office, led by Yvette Cooper, is seeking to redefine terrorism to be “more diverse.”  What began with the arrest of Tommy Robinson and hundreds of “far-right” protestors and social media users, they want to expand to include extreme right-wing, Islamist extremism, extreme misogyny, left-wing, anarchist and single-issue extremism, as well as school massacre and online gore subcultures and conspiracy theories.

And then there are biosecurity measures which are being currently tested under the claim of a bird flu outbreak.

– RHODA WILSON

Mad Cow Disease, The Counter-Extremism Sprint And The Normalisation Of State Tyranny

By Jamie Jessop

How do you normalise what is in effect very abnormal? In fact, how to normalise that which is terrifyingly abnormal in a free, fair, open and democratic society? Simples. You open Pandora’s Box whilst simultaneously shifting the Overton Window sharply to the left or right. You can dial back the Overton Window_[1] at your convenience any time you think it might cause unrest among the natives, but Pandora’s Box remains firmly open.

This is what has happened with the “Lab Leak Theory”: for most of the last 4 years, you’ve been an online far-right conspiracy theorist – and quite likely a terrorism threat (if you have more than a handful of followers) – for daring to suggest that the evidence points to SARS-CoV-2 escaping (or even being allowed to escape) from a laboratory in Wuhan. But now the CIA has piped up following Trump’s formal swearing-in as President and admitted what has long been bleedin’ obvious to anyone in possession of more than one brain cell – SARS-CoV-2 was made in a laboratory and escaped (or was released). Hey presto! Dangerous, far-right conspiracy theorists are not far wrong all of a sudden!

But you know, those same dangerous far-right conspiracy theorists were also suggesting that the vaccine was not as “safe and effective” as was loudly and aggressively claimed by the establishment and that the insanely coerced mass vaccination campaign and even vaccine mandates were in fact politically and/or financially motivated. That would get you shut down on social media in 2020 and 2021 and possibly entail a visit from Plod,^[2] even Plod working for a counter-terrorism unit waving a piece of paper saying your rights are thereby suspended. But it’s all cool now: Whitty, former Covid Witchfinder General in charge of “following the science,” now admits that “vaccine mandates were 100% political.”

When Sir Chris Whitty told the Covid Inquiry last week that the decision to make Covid vaccines mandatory was “100% political,” my jaw hit the floor.

Whoa! What about the government’s insistence that it was “following the science”?

What about informed consent? How could mandatory vaccination even be contemplated if the Chief Medical Officer was against it?

For anyone who’s blocked out the memory of the awful decisions the government too often took during the pandemic, let’s remind ourselves that care home workers were sacked if they refused to be vaccinated, despite the fact that the vaccine did not stop infection or transmission.

There was then a proposal, though later abandoned, thank God, for all healthcare workers to face the same mandate, again on pain of losing their jobs.

And for months it was seriously proposed that everyone in the country would be obliged to carry “vaccine passports” just to go about their daily business.

No wonder so many felt coerced. Yet, we now know, thanks to the interminably slow Covid Inquiry, that Chris Whitty was deeply sceptical about mandates.

Chris Whitty made one Covid vaccine admission that caused my jaw to hit the floor, Express, 27 January 2025

There’s a reason it’s interminably slow; it’s so the state can shift the Overton Window to the right with each new damning revelation and not have the public up in arms about the violation of our human rights and the Nuremberg Code by lying grifters intent on imposing Schwab’s “new normal” Great Reset whilst making a very handsome profit at the same time.

Whitty is not going to jail even though he just spaffed the contents of Pandora’s Box all over the front page of the Daily Express. The Covid public inquiry just normalised tyranny “for the greater good” and now our glorious leaders will just dial back the Overton Window at their leisure until the next time they need to move it – like maybe now: Defra’s coming for your chickens folks.

I told you they would.  Read: ‘UK Government Proposes Compulsory Registration For Anyone Keeping Chickens’

But it’s okay; they’re not locking down you and your kids and injecting you with novel, gene-based, “safe and effective” untested “therapies” to protect granny, they’re just doing that to your egg-laying chucks this time – and mass murdering them as an additional bio-security measure … because, well, they can. Tyrannical psychopaths gonna normalise tyranny under the guise of protecting us from dangerous pathogens. Which brings me nicely on to Mad Cow disease:

Yvette Cooper’s Home Office is seeking to redefine terrorism to be more inclusive:

Diversity is our strength – except when too much “diversity” is a weakness, in the Woke narrative. Because sadly, more than 90% of people referred to Prevent^[3] are there because they show Islamic extremist tendencies, and in fact, 90% or more of all terrorist attacks are committed by Islamic extremists, i.e. radicalised Muslims. It’s just not good enough; we need more far-right, white supremacist terrorists and more misogynists (as long as they’re not trans misogynists obviously). Hence Cooper and her team of lefty work-from-home civil servants are recommending a “rapid analytical sprint” regarding counter-terrorist measures:

The ‘rapid analytical sprint’ launched by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper in the wake of the Southport killings and the riots they sparked last summer also proposes a new approach to counter-extremism based on people’s actions and the harm they cause rather than the ideologies to which they subscribe.

It says there is now a ‘more diverse’ range of extremist beliefs ranging from anarchists and environmental protesters to those obsessed by school massacres and an online subculture of misogynists called the ‘manosphere’.

Now criticising two-tier policing can be example of ‘far-Right extremism’, leaked Home Office report claims, Daily Mail, 27 January 2025

The Mad Cow is actually recommending that if you say nasty, hurty things online (about “alleged” Pakistani rape gangs for instance), and in particular if you say nasty things about our Glorious Leader Two-Tier Keir, then you should be categorised as a potential far-right terrorist:

It says there is now a ‘more diverse’ range of extremist beliefs ranging from anarchists and environmental protesters to those obsessed by school massacres and an online subculture of misogynists called the ‘manosphere’.

It states: ‘The range of extremist beliefs and ideologies individuals subscribe to is becoming more diverse, from Extreme Right-Wing to Islamist Extremism to Extreme Misogyny to Left-Wing, Anarchist and Single-Issue Extremism.

‘Additionally, school massacre and online gore subcultures and conspiracy theories, while not ideologies, can lead to harmful fixations on violence.’

Now criticising two-tier policing can be example of ‘far-Right extremism’, leaked Home Office report claims, Daily Mail, 27 January 2025

But these are just “recommendations” at the moment according to our Home Office currently afflicted by BSE^[4] in its upper echelon:  “Last night the Home Office stressed that none of the 38 recommendations in the report have been agreed by ministers so far.”

Oh really? I call bullsh*t on that. The consequences of the radicalised Home Office approach to terrorism are already starting to play out:

It’s not just Tommy Robinson getting arrested under counter-terrorism legislation now. Hundreds of “far-right” protestors and speakers of hurty words on social media currently serving long prison sentences are evidence that the Government is intent on weaponising the judicial system to go after its political and ideological opponents. The diversification of counter-terrorist legislation is just another string in their bow. It’s just a shame that they couldn’t have diversified it sufficiently to snare Rudakubana^[5] during one of his three encounters with Prevent – because then they might have lived up to their billing and actually prevented the massacre of three little girls in Southport and the serious wounding of several others.

Notes:

^[1] The Overton Window is a concept in political science that describes the range of policies considered politically acceptable by the mainstream public at a given time.  It was introduced by Joseph Overton, a policy analyst, and is named after him. The window can shift and expand, reflecting changes in public opinion and the political climate. Politicians generally only pursue policies that are widely accepted within society as legitimate options, which lie inside the Overton Window.  The concept is often used to explain how certain ideas move from being considered radical or extreme to becoming mainstream.

^[2] The term “plod” is a British slang term used to refer to a police officer, particularly one who is slow-witted or dull. This slang term originates from the character Mr. Plod in Enid Blyton’s Noddy stories.

^[3] The Prevent strategy is a key part of the UK’s counter-terrorism efforts, aimed at stopping people from being drawn into terrorism and supporting extremist ideologies. It is a component of the government’s overall counter-terrorism strategy, known as CONTEST, which includes other strands such as Pursue, Protect and Prepare.

In 2023, the strategy was updated following a major independent review, which recommended a stronger, more transparent and proportionate approach to stopping radicalisation. The updated Prevent strategy places greater emphasis on tackling Islamist ideology, which underpins the primary terrorist threat to the UK while remaining vigilant against all other threats.

^[4] Mad cow disease is also known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (“BSE”).

^[5] Axel Rudakubana is an 18-year-old boy who was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 52 years for the murders of three young girls, the attempted murders of eight other children and two adults, and possession of a weapon. The horrific killings took place on 29 July 2024 at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, Merseyside. Rudakubana was 17 at the time.

He was previously referred to the government’s anti-extremism scheme, Prevent, three times before the murders due to a fixation with violence.  Rudakubana possessed an al-Qaeda handbook and was researching genocides and watching graphic videos of murder. However, counter-terrorism officials assessed that he did not pose a risk of supporting terrorism or carrying out acts of violence in support of any cause.

After his arrest, a search revealed Rudakubana was found to have produced ricin, a highly toxic biological agent, in his home.  The ricin found was estimated to be capable of killing 12,690 people if fully produced and utilised.