Dragged from his home by baton-wielding officers, a pensioner’s tweet turned into a £20,000 lesson in overreach.
CINDY HARPER
A Kent man wrongly arrested over a social media post warning has received £20,000 ($27,000) in compensation, after police conceded their handling of the incident was inappropriate and unlawful.
Julian Foulkes, a 71-year-old retired special constable from Gillingham, was detained at home last November by six officers carrying batons and pepper spray. The arrest followed his reply on X to a pro-Palestinian activist threatening legal action against then-home secretary Suella Braverman for describing London demonstrations as “hate marches.”
More: Keir Starmer’s Censorship Playbook
Foulkes was arrested for alleged malicious communications, locked in a police cell for eight hours, and interrogated. Although no criminal act had taken place, he accepted a caution under duress, worried that refusing it might jeopardize international travel plans to visit family in Australia. That caution has now been officially removed from his record.
Earlier this month, Kent Police acknowledged that the caution was issued in error. Chief Constable Tim Smith called Foulkes personally to apologize, referring to the arrest as an “ordeal.” A follow-up letter from the force to Foulkes’s solicitors confirmed a settlement agreement and reiterated regret over the incident.
The letter, sent by the force’s legal representative, stated: “I am instructed to accept the offer of early resolution without recourse to litigation by payment of compensation in the sum of £20,000 ($27,000) plus your client’s reasonable legal fees in full and final settlement of all prospective claims arising from his arrest on Nov 2, 2023.”
Kent Police has now referred the matter to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).
The Free Speech Union (FSU), which supported Foulkes throughout the legal process, condemned the incident as a fundamental breach of civil liberties. Dr. Bryn Harris, the group’s chief legal counsel, said: “The [FSU] is pleased to see that Kent Police has done the right thing and apologized to Julian, with due compensation. This is, however, merely the end of the beginning – we now need to see a full and credible investigation into the outrageous violations of Julian’s basic freedoms.”
He added that the case underlined the need for law enforcement to respect the principles of democratic policing: “Kent Police must ensure that the distress to Julian, and the cost to the taxpayer, result in lessons learnt and a realization that policing by consent requires a police service worthy of the consent of free citizens.”
If you’re tired of censorship and surveillance, subscribe to Reclaim The Net.
This article (Kent Police Pays £20,000 Compensation to Retired Constable for Unlawful Arrest Over Tweet) was created and published by Reclaim the Net and is republished here under “Fair Use” with attribution to the author Cindy Harper
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of The Liberty Beacon Project.
Leave a Reply